Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys I need ya help about a month ago I bought a 89 r32 gtst and its been running real rich I don't know why I'll let you know a couple of things that were already done when I bought it the turbo has been taken off and it has a r33 AFM and I think it still runs a turbo computer it hesitate's till 2000rpm then it pulls really hard sumtimes it just lights up both back wheels

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Whow whow whow!

Are you trying to say, that you have a turbod car, removed the turbo, and thought the car would run fine like that?

Oh my Jesus. Why did you remove the turbo?

There's not enough facepalm pics on the interwebz to suffice,is there?

Ok, we need some clarification.

The turbo was taken off....and a new one put on in it's place. Right?

If not, there is no freakin' way in hell it's EVER going to "light up both back wheels". An RB20de-t wouldn't have the nuts to pull the skin off a custard. Perhaps your clutch is rooted?

If it does not have a turbo, then there's your problem. Why don't you put the turbo back on? Otherwise short of an aftermarket ECU and a dyno tune, it's never going to run well.

Lol I bet my left nut it doesnt go hard. I reckon I could beat you on a push bike.

Are you on your p's?

Cowboy: I gather there is no turbo!

Frozenbrain (chris) you got yourself a car that has been molested, put the turbo back on or give it to me and Ill show you what you should do with it!

If not, there is no freakin' way in hell it's EVER going to "light up both back wheels". An RB20de-t wouldn't have the nuts to pull the skin off a custard. Perhaps your clutch is rooted?

.

What oher sayings could we use for this?

Couldn't pull a sailor off your sister is one that springs to mind.

LOL @ goes gard....8.5:1 comp NA RB20 with turbo cams, rich as hell, f**k all timing

Id be it would be hard to go up a hill

Man it doesnt matter how many times you ask if that ecu is cheap.

For you to call us f**kheads is just idiotic. A f**khead would remove a turbo from a rb20, whereas the people who posted in this thread would not do so.

Look at that poor car. Also in your info, you cant say you have a 32 gtst. Theres no f**kin turbo.

Someone talk some sense into this kid please.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing....the basics of fuel and ignition are deceptively simple.....getting it to behave like factory in all conditions after airflow mods is way more complex. Newer cars like the V37 are all about modifying the standard ECU which is about a billion times more complex than they were 20 years ago, with a bunch of parameters affecting others
    • The larger TB I had on the SS was a pain to get to idle right, but, that was cable In the end they just raised the idle up a couple of hundred RPM so it was happy idling away either in gear or in park (slush box life) I'm curious on how my NC will idle with the new intake, larger TB, and cams that are currently going in/on, but I have faith that MX5 Mania will sort this "electronical" "black magic" out the best they can in the tune with a electronic TB Sometimes I wish I knew more about the intricacies of tuning, but most of the time I don't because I know it would hurt my brain 🤣
    • That's the thing. Cam is smaller than before.. though the old cam was +6 degrees advanced. We're talking huge changes here, the narrowbands want to trim out 20% of fuel and pull the (wideband) idle to like 16.0 AFR or such. One side is a little more trimmy than the other. Think along the lines of ~20% to ~15-18%. Unfortunately my scouring of the internet hasn't really found anyone with this issue. People either just disable NB's or have them wildly different, where one is -20% and the other is +20 or 0 (i.e a sensor is just dead/wiring is just busted). Turning them off and relying on the base map only results in the wideband reporting at about 14.0 with the Varex closed. It'd be a little leaner (closer to 14.7ish) with the Varex open. I know I can just change the switch points so that the narrowbands agree with the wideband, but it's still odd. Both of them are reading voltage, it's just that they're reading quite high mv, in the ~800 region. It's just odd. This was with the IAT fudged to report it was about ~22 degrees which is my guesstimation of the temperature in the room. I have an OEM sensor ready to try tonight, which is slow and crap - but .. worked last time I used it. Sadly I am aware that idle tuning with the big TB is going to be a PITA and I look 'forward' to many hours spent stalling or stumbling idle or delving into drivability things.
    • The GTR strut brace clears the new manifold.. by about 0.5mm. So this means I need to buy an OEM GTT Strut brace (again), which will clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. I guess I can sell the GTR Strut brace with the bonnet with the vents as a package deal as someone will need this one day. So my choices are vented bonnet but no strut brace, or GTR Bonnet with OEM brace (which I have to buy) but is bright red instead of the same colour as the rest of the car, which means the entire front end of the car will just be red until it goes back to paint jail. In other news the engine starts and doesn't leak. Why both O2 narrowband sensors think the tune is rich AF I do not know. The idle is also pretty shitty and my expensive IAT sensor from the USA is dead. The car sounds awful. But I assume or at least hope this is due to the many exhaust leaks, and the concrete garage it is in, sitting there with 0 intake bolted to it, and no bonnet or panels or anything to stop the induction/intake sound which is about 200db.
×
×
  • Create New...