Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok guys first no flaming and stupid coments.

Now seeming I can't run low mount turbos in my BMW rb26 iv gone topmount twins as iv got some apexi manifolds very cheap only thing is I need to change the flanges to suite whatever turbo I choose. So straight away I need custom dumps and intakes anyway. Now my question Subaru td04l turbos are very cheap but yet a good turbo only really suited to 1.6 to 2.0 motors and my rb26 being a obvious 2.6 would spool these very well now

Pros steel wheeled

Trust bearing

T25 dump patten I'm fairly sure correct me if I'm wrong

Oil and water cooled

Easy flange to weld on

Leaves me with other options of upgrading to other td turbos

Good for 14+ psi

Cons

I have r34 gtr turbos already and picking up a set of r33 gtr turbos next week

Can't think of much else

I would expect around 250 to 280 kw out of these can anyone give me estimated spool times? Also would it be a bad turbo choice just remember I don't want to spend 2g on -5 -7 -9 I'll be running external gate anyway so that gets rid of boost contoll issues td04 has with high boost. Any info will be appreciated

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/398275-td04-turbos-on-a-rb26/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ive seen Subi TD04s on a 1JZ

was rubbish

I would have a look at some of the smaller kando's

the subi's units mostly have a weird 3 bolt pattern and turbine hosuings that will be too big for a twin application under 3L imo

Yeah been looking at them for the last few days I would get the ones off a ej20 not ej25 not sure if it's different tho I'm not after big power just easy and they won't explode when was the 2j seeing some decent boost?

i be getting some td05/16g or t518z kando units on a rb26..............i got a 2jz going be running twin kando td06's.......td04's are prettty small turbo the 1jz boys max them out pretty quick

I tuned some t517z on stock rb26 today. Alittle laggy but made 331kw. Very fast on the road

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...