Jump to content
SAU Community

Vk56 R34 Gt-R


Recommended Posts

I've seen alot of 350z and G35 owners and others do the VK56 swap and it's a great engine. My question is can you swap a VK56 into an R34 without replacing the transmission. I don't mean can it handle the power and torque, I mean can the gearbox actually bolt up to the engine. It would be amazing if the VK56 can bolt up to an R34 GT-R and keep the AWD while having the VK56. So what do you think guys can this be done...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I asked Robbie Ward if a VK56 would fit in a skyline and he said that it would be to wide and wont fit easily in GTR engine bay. He has one for his new rail car and said these are massive compared to a LS1

Edited by WHITER33GTS-T
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yh haha I think I underthought this idea haha if anyone can do it Robbie can. I just thought it was a good idea since I've seen these engines being thrown at everything and they're good engines. i think the front diff thing would pretty much kill this idea would it not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything you aim to do with 2.6lt can be more easily achieved, be more reliable, and will be less stressed overall when its done with more displacement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything you aim to do with 2.6lt can be more easily achieved, be more reliable, and will be less stressed overall when its done with more displacement.

Just just think how much fun a twin turbo VK56 would be.... or stoke it to 6lt first :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything you aim to do with 2.6lt can be more easily achieved, be more reliable, and will be less stressed overall when its done with more displacement.

Not for the money.

Spend $30k shoehorning a VK56 into a GTR and you'll have a bog stock VK56 in a GTR. Spend $30k building up an RB26 and you'll smash the living shit out of your stock VK56 engined R34.

Not to mention the aftermarket support for RBs is probably 100 times larger than that of a VK. Sure, when money is no object, go nutso. I'd do some crazy conversions if I had millions, but just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Vk56 at its widest point is 26.5"

these only came out with an auto behind them

There is also the reluctor wheel mounted to the flex plate

there is an adapter plate and clutch kit available off the shelf to match a 370z manual

there is also the height, custom manifold defiantly will be needed

there is also the sump which holds oil vertically at the rear of motor, instead of the horizontal like the RBs (this was to fit the front diff in front of it so it would fit in the Nissan titans

On top of that, not much room for the turbos

they also came out at 9.8:1 (some with corn based eflex)

2007+ = cvct

timing chain also has been known to jump at high revs

US guys claim 17mile/gallon with their n/a

Ecu? 370z use same computer

pistons Google gtm

cams Google Jim wolf technology (s2/s7 s2vct s8 or s8vct most popular

(costs

2k long motor

1k 370z box

1,200 adapter plate

1,200 flywheel/ clutch kit

1,500 cams

300 springs

2-3k importing costs

1,200 pistons

6k stillen supercharger kit

then once here 5k+ fabrication

End result probably around 450-500hp

edit;

Just noticed the dates, sorry for mega post bump lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally i'd prefer to heavily mod the RB than to fit the VK.... in fact there's already proven records of 1200hp RBs so... why go to all the hassle of putting a stock VK into a GTR?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Mega bump and my first post in maybe 5 years but yeah Robbie Ward is right, they are wide as hell being twin cam and all, but they do fit. Google Ian Fournier.

I've got a high comp atmo VK56 in my R32 sedan drift build.

The tightest part was the clearance between the strut towers and the exhaust ports.

Ended up putting in an S14 steering rack for better clearance and getting a custom steering column made to change the angle on the universal to give more room.

Also ditched the brake and clutch masters, running a floor mounted pedal box with remote reservoirs instead. That part isn't essential but I wanted to mount the engine as far back in the engine bay as possible cos racecar.

Custom tunnel etc. Got photos if anyone's curious.

Putting one in an R34 would be fairly similar I would imagine, but forget AWD, if you wanna go big get one of robbies 4wd RB30 long blocks. Be way cheaper in the long run.

Edited by Hillstc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

VH41 is possible. There is a thread on here somewhere about putting one in a Stagea with a Manual AWD box. Must dig out the thread and see how its going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needs more power though - 330AWKW is just a rough and ready RB30 or a mildly modified RB26.

Not saying you're wrong, but it is daily driven on unopened motor with fuel supply issues. and an 80's Jap V8 engine to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not saying you're wrong, but it is daily driven on unopened motor with fuel supply issues. and an 80's Jap V8 engine to boot.

I'm not saying 330 awkw is not a decent lot of power but it just seems (in my opinion) a barely adequate return for the huge amount of time and money that has gone into this (well executed) project. And of course it needs a better fuel supply. The owners seem happy with it and that's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am currently going this route. I am curious how much horse power you put behind the cut bell housing? Collins was telling me I am going to crack it and bluh bluh bluh. Because I didn’t buy the custom fly wheel from him. I am looking for somewhere around like 500 hp
    • Forgot to mention that these are the before pics when I first got it!
    • Thanks @PranK for the updated member status, much appreciated! 👍🏼 Now, about those pics… Unfortunately I could only find ones that I took in the dark. I was soon to discover that underneath it wasn’t in the best shape, but it was mine and that’s all I cared about at the time 😆
    • Oh, and only having done this task yesterday, I've now driven the car ~60km since, and while it is hard to avoid placebo effect and confirmation bias, I reckon that some annoyances I had with the way the car has been behaving have improved. Which....kinda makes sense, I guess. If the bushes were really stiff and resisting rotation, they would have been contributing to the effective wheel rate. And if it was more so on one side (which it was, because one side was worse than the other) then.... you might imagine that the additional rate would be asymmetric, and potentially even different between compression and rebound. And so... the car has been twitchy at higher speeds - like freeway on ramps. It really shouldn't be. The wheel alignment is good and there are no (other) known problems elsewhere in the suspension. But at 90-100 on a long sweeping ramp, tiny steering wheel motions would make it feel like it wanted to rear steer. Quite nervous. At lower speeds it would heave about in a manner that it didn't use to. Didn't want to put power down, etc etc. Now...seems to behave better. Am going to have to concentrate on the various corners where it has exhibited weirdness, on the rare occasions when I can get a decent run at them without Methanial getting in the way in his D-Max/Ranger/LDV Van/etc.
×
×
  • Create New...