Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I just changed the 3 belts for AC PS and Alternator. The old ones were worn and not much left in them. I put the old ones on in the past and never had any noise issues. Now these new belts(Bando and Exebelt) give off a squeal on startup and only for about a second. No noise if I turn the wheel left and right, no noise from switch the AC on etc. I don't know which belt it is. Is the sqeual due to under tensioned belt, over tensioned belt or do I need to let the new belts set in?

what about a small amount of grease? worked on mine, but check the tension again on belts from memory its somting like 8-10mm under 10kg of pressure half way between the pulleys

Back in the day I used soap to cover it up. But since these are new belts they are squealing because I did something wrong. I'll tension them up tomorrow. I'll give them all some pressure see which one feels least ysioned then tighten it up. Cheers guys.

yep, all the above is correct, the belts are loose, soap may mask the squeeling short term but they will still be loose, DONT use grease as it will be flung around everywhere if you use it and may actually cause a slipping belt to overheat and fail

Edited by StevenCJR31

Ok well after closer poking at the belts, AC and alternator seem nice and tight. Powersteering had I kid you not about 2cm of play in it if not more, and I know why. How the f**k do you fit any sort of tool in there to tension up the belt? That 12mm nut on that long ass theaded bolt gives you about 1mm of turn from top, bottom, side. You can't tighten it, I sat there for about 10 minutes, cut my hands open and got about 1 to 2 turns. Ive got a really long eco socket I think they call them(about 15cm long with 13mm one end 12mm the other). I jammed that in there and turned it as much as I could and it still doesn't feel tight enough.

Anyone got any advice? I don't know how or why Nissan made the other two tensioners a piece of piss to work with and this third one decided to troll everyone. You made bro? f**k YEAH I AM PIECE OF SHIT.

Edited by SargeRX8

ive gotten tension on belts before by using a short crowbar, albeit being VERY carefull what the bar rests on , heaps easier than trying to get tension by hand

i have a feeling i may have used a long extension on mine when i did it... but it was a looooong time ago now. but i know i did hold the socket to make sure than after i turned, when i swung back to have another go it didn't move, so i got the maximum abount of turn the next time. having a socket with fine rachet increments helps as well.

and the lever thing can sometimes work too if the nut is loose enough that it can be spun by hand when there is no pressure on it. then you only have to use the spanner/socket to do up the last bit

Just tensioned up all the belts a fair way more(they all seemed alot looser than before...). The PS pump is now tensioned up as much as the bolt can go and still feels pretty loose. Started the car up and no sound so I'm hoping its all done now. If necessary ill get a shorter belt for the PS pump. Cheers for the help guys.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...