Jump to content
SAU Community

Benefits Of Mounting Intercooler At A Slant?

eXquiSit
 Share

Recommended Posts

eXquiSit Mentor

eXquiSit

Posted
Posted

is there any efficiency gains from doing this?

most aftermarket kits are mounted vertically, but i noticed on some cars, such as gtr's, that the factory has mounted them on a slight angle?

is this so that the air passing though has to work harder 'against' the surface area of the fins and tubes instead of easily flowing 'past' them?

any thoughts would be much appreciated!

=)

R31Nismoid Grand Master

R31Nismoid

Posted
Posted

Doubt it makes much (if any) tangible difference. Could simply be a looks thing as much as performance.

The GTR one on an angle though - at least with a S3 front lip - the bottom of the cooler sits even with the bar. If it was vertical there would be quite a gap up the top of the cooler so it could be about reducing the gaps between bars/cores etc.

wedge_r34gtr Mentor

wedge_r34gtr

Posted
Posted

is there any efficiency gains from doing this?

most aftermarket kits are mounted vertically, but i noticed on some cars, such as gtr's, that the factory has mounted them on a slight angle?

is this so that the air passing though has to work harder 'against' the surface area of the fins and tubes instead of easily flowing 'past' them?

any thoughts would be much appreciated!

=)

From a thermodynamics point of view, the most effecient set-up would be perpendicular to the air flow (i.e. vertical) which would allow the maximum amount of frontal surface area to be exposed to the air flow. Slanted intercooler = less frontal surface area. More airflow = more stuff to cool the charge. This is the principle behind n1 vents and the shape of some bumps to direct air to the intercooler/radiator. It should be noted that manufactures design will play a part (i.e. were the internal channels designed with a slant install inmind toallow better airflow through the cooler).

But i also agree with Ash, any difference would be fairly intangible unless the intercolller was slanted at a large angle (say 15deg).

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted

From a thermodynamics point of view, the most effecient set-up would be perpendicular to the air flow (i.e. vertical) which would allow the maximum amount of frontal surface area to be exposed to the air flow. Slanted intercooler = less frontal surface area. More airflow = more stuff to cool the charge. This is the principle behind n1 vents and the shape of some bumps to direct air to the intercooler/radiator. It should be noted that manufactures design will play a part (i.e. were the internal channels designed with a slant install inmind toallow better airflow through the cooler).

But i also agree with Ash, any difference would be fairly intangible unless the intercolller was slanted at a large angle (say 15deg).

Actually if you look at the old school F1 car intercoolers they are mounted (As are radiators) at and angle to the air flow. It reduces drag for a given amount of heat exchange.

In a road car it is just for packaging.

wedge_r34gtr Mentor

wedge_r34gtr

Posted
Posted (edited)

....It reduces drag for a given amount of heat exchange.

In a road car it is just for packaging.

Both true, but from a thermodynamic point of view; this is not the optimium set-up.

air to air Intercooler design will always be a balance between drag reduction, packaging and cooler effeciency.

Edited by wedge_r34gtr
Bsa Mentor

Bsa

Posted
Posted

Iv always mounted coolers on a slant in my eyes it will restrict airflow to a extent meaning more time to cool the fins and tubes or bars also when on a skyline with not much room allows more surface area to be open before the bar support

Nee-san Grand Master

Nee-san

Posted
Posted

the position and geometry of the ducting feeding the heat exchanger really dictates it's position or angle of attack, as djr81 said, alot of grandprix cars are slanted on an angle to reduce drag in terms of frontal area exposed to the air stream and the ducting pod itself, there is nothing less efficient then just letting an intercooler or radiator "Swing in the wind" so to speak.

so to summarise I would say ducting makes or breaks the effectiveness of coolers.

89CAL Grand Master

89CAL

Posted
Posted

Iv always mounted coolers on a slant in my eyes it will restrict airflow to a extent meaning more time to cool the fins and tubes or bars also when on a skyline with not much room allows more surface area to be open before the bar support

Isn't it better to have air flowing quickly so there is more cold air hitting the fins. Slowing the air down means the air gets hotter so is less efficient.

This is how I see it anyway. Not saying I'm right. But I don't see any benefit from mounting it at an angle.

Bsa Mentor

Bsa

Posted
Posted

Isn't it better to have air flowing quickly so there is more cold air hitting the fins. Slowing the air down means the air gets hotter so is less efficient.

This is how I see it anyway. Not saying I'm right. But I don't see any benefit from mounting it at an angle.

Im not 100% but it's always worked on the many Iv done way I look at it is it will create a slight pressure drop behind the cooler which would help the radiator as well because it will cause the air to aim more into the radiator centre

pipster11 Grand Master

pipster11

Posted
Posted

you want a high mass flow rate for more heat transfer

so therefore more air going through it

so therefore less time per particle

i can dig out my thermodynamics book if needed

Dajae Community Regular

Dajae

Posted
Posted

You could have all the fancy ducting and frontal exposure in the world, but unless that heated air has some where to go (read: low pressure after heat exchange), it wont do much.. Too often you see people install these 100mm+ thick intercoolers just to have them sitting near-flush with radiator/fans/supports, etc.

It's much more worthwhile to examine the air that is trying to escape than worrying about how the air enters.. My two cents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • silviaz
      R34 GTT idle problem

      By silviaz · Posted

      One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • GTSBoy
      Cleaning my wheels 😍

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • GTSBoy
      R34 GTT idle problem

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • MBS206
      HKS stroker kit step 0/1 or HKS GTIII 2530

      By MBS206 · Posted

      If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • MBS206
      HKS stroker kit step 0/1 or HKS GTIII 2530

      By MBS206 · Posted

      The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...