Benefits Of Mounting Intercooler At A Slant?

[eXquiSit]

is there any efficiency gains from doing this?

most aftermarket kits are mounted vertically, but i noticed on some cars, such as gtr's, that the factory has mounted them on a slight angle?

is this so that the air passing though has to work harder 'against' the surface area of the fins and tubes instead of easily flowing 'past' them?

any thoughts would be much appreciated!

=)

[abr33]

Maybe slightly, but I believe most are slanted to fit and along with the slanted radiator in some, particularly 300zx's and the like. Could be wrong

[RDIRTY4]

My Intercooler is on a slight slant because of the clearance between itself and the thermo fan.

[GTSBoy]

Can't be anything that you could measure outside a windtunnel (as in, it would be that small a change).

[Captain Natro]

xr6 turbos are at a slight tilt from factory, duno y...

[zebra]

Packaging constraints

/thread

[R31Nismoid]

Doubt it makes much (if any) tangible difference. Could simply be a looks thing as much as performance.

The GTR one on an angle though - at least with a S3 front lip - the bottom of the cooler sits even with the bar. If it was vertical there would be quite a gap up the top of the cooler so it could be about reducing the gaps between bars/cores etc.

[wedge_r34gtr]

is there any efficiency gains from doing this?

most aftermarket kits are mounted vertically, but i noticed on some cars, such as gtr's, that the factory has mounted them on a slight angle?

is this so that the air passing though has to work harder 'against' the surface area of the fins and tubes instead of easily flowing 'past' them?

any thoughts would be much appreciated!

=)

From a thermodynamics point of view, the most effecient set-up would be perpendicular to the air flow (i.e. vertical) which would allow the maximum amount of frontal surface area to be exposed to the air flow. Slanted intercooler = less frontal surface area. More airflow = more stuff to cool the charge. This is the principle behind n1 vents and the shape of some bumps to direct air to the intercooler/radiator. It should be noted that manufactures design will play a part (i.e. were the internal channels designed with a slant install inmind toallow better airflow through the cooler).

But i also agree with Ash, any difference would be fairly intangible unless the intercolller was slanted at a large angle (say 15deg).

[djr81]

From a thermodynamics point of view, the most effecient set-up would be perpendicular to the air flow (i.e. vertical) which would allow the maximum amount of frontal surface area to be exposed to the air flow. Slanted intercooler = less frontal surface area. More airflow = more stuff to cool the charge. This is the principle behind n1 vents and the shape of some bumps to direct air to the intercooler/radiator. It should be noted that manufactures design will play a part (i.e. were the internal channels designed with a slant install inmind toallow better airflow through the cooler).

But i also agree with Ash, any difference would be fairly intangible unless the intercolller was slanted at a large angle (say 15deg).

Actually if you look at the old school F1 car intercoolers they are mounted (As are radiators) at and angle to the air flow. It reduces drag for a given amount of heat exchange.

In a road car it is just for packaging.

[wedge_r34gtr]

....It reduces drag for a given amount of heat exchange.

In a road car it is just for packaging.

Both true, but from a thermodynamic point of view; this is not the optimium set-up.

air to air Intercooler design will always be a balance between drag reduction, packaging and cooler effeciency.

Edited May 7, 2012 by wedge_r34gtr

[Bsa]

Iv always mounted coolers on a slant in my eyes it will restrict airflow to a extent meaning more time to cool the fins and tubes or bars also when on a skyline with not much room allows more surface area to be open before the bar support

[Nee-san]

the position and geometry of the ducting feeding the heat exchanger really dictates it's position or angle of attack, as djr81 said, alot of grandprix cars are slanted on an angle to reduce drag in terms of frontal area exposed to the air stream and the ducting pod itself, there is nothing less efficient then just letting an intercooler or radiator "Swing in the wind" so to speak.

so to summarise I would say ducting makes or breaks the effectiveness of coolers.

[eXquiSit]

nice nice... thanks for the info guys!

=)

[89CAL]

Iv always mounted coolers on a slant in my eyes it will restrict airflow to a extent meaning more time to cool the fins and tubes or bars also when on a skyline with not much room allows more surface area to be open before the bar support

Isn't it better to have air flowing quickly so there is more cold air hitting the fins. Slowing the air down means the air gets hotter so is less efficient.

This is how I see it anyway. Not saying I'm right. But I don't see any benefit from mounting it at an angle.

[Bsa]

Isn't it better to have air flowing quickly so there is more cold air hitting the fins. Slowing the air down means the air gets hotter so is less efficient.

This is how I see it anyway. Not saying I'm right. But I don't see any benefit from mounting it at an angle.

Im not 100% but it's always worked on the many Iv done way I look at it is it will create a slight pressure drop behind the cooler which would help the radiator as well because it will cause the air to aim more into the radiator centre

[pipster11]

you want a high mass flow rate for more heat transfer

so therefore more air going through it

so therefore less time per particle

i can dig out my thermodynamics book if needed

[Dajae]

You could have all the fancy ducting and frontal exposure in the world, but unless that heated air has some where to go (read: low pressure after heat exchange), it wont do much.. Too often you see people install these 100mm+ thick intercoolers just to have them sitting near-flush with radiator/fans/supports, etc.

It's much more worthwhile to examine the air that is trying to escape than worrying about how the air enters.. My two cents.