Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi people.

As you may or may not have heard/read on "Ask Bird the wise man thread" I was originally in the market with $30k looking for a FG XR6T or FPV.

However shit happened (for one thing certain parts of the Skyline is broken again & since I'm retarded & can't use a spanner this means it is that time of the year in my life to pour crap load of $$$ to get it fixed) & my budget has dropped to $20k, which at this range can only get me old BA or earlier BF XR6Ts which all had the aging 4 speed auto box, which from what I have read is garbage & I'm trying to avoid.

So I started to look at some Jap alternative relatively powerful family sedans & with our resident mod mad082 always mentioning his old Mangna with cat back at the drags put a time which can rivial a stock GTS-T, the 380 has caught my attention.

The fact that they have horrible resale value is a big + for me, quick carsales search shows that I can get upper range GT /VXR models with all the fancy crap (leather, sun roof, reverse sensors etc etc) for $16-18k or so & all the base models (ES) hover around the $10k-$12k range.

This compared to the Aurion (the other one I was looking at) which seem to only start at close to $20k for base models.

So has anyone owned one of these? & what is your opinion on it?

Also how well does it respond to mods (or at all?).

Cheers.

Edited by Mayuri Krab
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/
Share on other sites

Just an alternative if you're after an auto fwd.

Maximas also depreciate badly.

My 85 yr old Mum decided she needed to downsize. Her 1997 GXE only has 70,000km on it and couldn't sell it for more than $5K > gave it away to my nephew. It has a good engine.

She was also looking at Magnas at the time.

One thing you may not know ( out of interest ) is that in the mid 90s, Nissan brought in just a few manual versions too.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/#findComment-6351920
Share on other sites

Yep, my wife has one.

A 2005 GT. It has everything except a reversing camera (has sensors).

Enough power although it is strangled a little by the intake scoop and the rear muffler (easy replacements).

Car is a very nice cruiser and has pretty good economy for a big 3.8L sedan.

They are quite large though (bigger than a VE).

Don't get anything less than an VRX, there is a big difference between the bottom two (ES, SX) and the top two (VRX, GT) spec cars.

Forget about tuning though, the ECU is so far unchippable/flashable and only one piggyback "works".

Nice car, just need to chuck a transmission cooler on it :)

Edited by iamhe77
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/#findComment-6352605
Share on other sites

Hi people.

As you may or may not have heard/read on "Ask Bird the wise man thread" I was originally in the market with $30k looking for a FG XR6T or FPV.

However shit happened (for one thing certain parts of the Skyline is broken again & since I'm retarded & can't use a spanner this means it is that time of the year in my life to pour crap load of $$$ to get it fixed) & my budget has dropped to $20k, which at this range can only get me old BA or earlier BF XR6Ts which all had the aging 4 speed auto box, which from what I have read is garbage & I'm trying to avoid.

The BF xr6t autos are all 6 speed.not 4 speed and you should be able to get a decent one for 20k. I'd love to get 20k for my 06 with 75k on it but I just wont. I know being over west changes the market a bit though.

As for the 380 I'vr got a mate with an early model and it seems like a decent car, nice features, comfortable, reasonable pull.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/#findComment-6354136
Share on other sites

The BF xr6t autos are all 6 speed.not 4 speed and you should be able to get a decent one for 20k. I'd love to get 20k for my 06 with 75k on it but I just wont. I know being over west changes the market a bit though.

As for the 380 I'vr got a mate with an early model and it seems like a decent car, nice features, comfortable, reasonable pull.

The BA had the 4 speed did it?

Edited by iplen
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/#findComment-6355249
Share on other sites

Aurion Sportivo 20k?

even if its 22k, theres no comparison

Safety features up the wa- zoo, 200 killer wasps, huge boot, plenty of interior space, excellent resale, well trimmed, good looking... and its a fcuking toyota

i defy you to choose a better bang for your buck automobile

Edited by ctjet
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/#findComment-6355731
Share on other sites

Aurion Sportivo 20k?

even if its 22k, theres no comparison

Safety features up the wa- zoo, 200 killer wasps, huge boot, plenty of interior space, excellent resale, well trimmed, good looking... and its a fcuking toyota

i defy you to choose a better bang for your buck automobile

and they sound pretty shit hot. one went past work with a decent exhaust on it. has a similar sound to the RB (sounds better than a natro skyline though)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/399851-mitsubishi-380/#findComment-6356256
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...