Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

only ever had 1 thing go wrong with my parents in 10 years of owning it....

Depending on what you want the car for will determine what you buy, i suppose. a $8000 buck 2003 verada is way better bang for buck than a 22K Aurion, as long as you can get over the fact that its not stupidly fast. But hey that isn't the point is it?

Out of interest why no Commodores - for 20k you should be able to get the 6.0L VZ (not as great as the VEs L98 but still a great engine). Fuel consumption might be a concern around town but if you are doing a lot of highway kms then it shouldnt be too different especially if you were originally looking at Ford Turbos.

Didn't expect so many responses. :yes:

Cheers people.

Don't get anything less than an VRX, there is a big difference between the bottom two (ES, SX) and the top two (VRX, GT) spec cars.

Forget about tuning though, the ECU is so far unchippable/flashable and only one piggyback "works".

Nice car, just need to chuck a transmission cooler on it :)

Care to explain more in detail on the differences between VRX/GT vs ES/SX?

Dam about the tuning though... bummer.

Why do you want a depreciating big nose heavy FWD V6?

Seem to be the majority of the bunch in my budget. Car will mainly be used for a 50/50 driving to work duty (shared with the Skyline) & then long distance driving.

Fast in gear acceleration is pretty much the only 'performance' requirment at this stage.

What about a skyline 250,300 or 350 gt sedan?

Trying to avoid imports this time.

The BF xr6t autos are all 6 speed.not 4 speed and you should be able to get a decent one for 20k. I'd love to get 20k for my 06 with 75k on it but I just wont. I know being over west changes the market a bit though.

You're right, noob mistake I made there, the 4 speed boxes were all BAs (I somehow saw the MK II behind the ads & assumed it to be a BF, that & I can't see much difference between the 2 from the looks).

Prices in WA seems higher in general. Majority of XR6Ts that is well below my budget are all BAs with a few BF MK 1s sitting at the $20k mark.

I read somewhere that the MK 2 BFs had stronger engine internals (used FPV stuff) & hence better potential for squeezing more killerwasps from?

Maybe I should buy a BF MK2 over the east next time I go over for a holiday or something, & then drive it back... LOL

toyota mark 2 jzx110 would be my choice. do not go the ford route ...be fixing it every week. lol

Those seem to be really rare, & I'm trying to avoid imports this time & just buy something local.

Out of interest why no Commodores - for 20k you should be able to get the 6.0L VZ (not as great as the VEs L98 but still a great engine). Fuel consumption might be a concern around town but if you are doing a lot of highway kms then it shouldnt be too different especially if you were originally looking at Ford Turbos.

I did look at them but the biggest let down for me is that besides the current VEs, all the past SS commos came with an old 4 speed box without tiptronic function.

I like the car to have a more modern 5/6 speed auto with tiptronic (one of the main reasons I was looking at Ford in the 1st place as the 6 speed ZF is considered to be one of the best atm).

I'm lazy 95% of the time & would just leave it in D & just floor it if I need to overtake anybody, but for that 5% when I feel like playing around with the gears I like that option there.

Otherwise I quit like the SS commodores styling over the similar year Falcon/380/Aurion.

Cheers for that, I somehow always assumed Liberties to be more expensive than that... hmm might look into it.

Never met a 380 owner, but anyone who's hired cars will have at some time driven one.

Always the same response.

Likes: Great highway cruiser, comfortable, power to spare, economical.

Dislikes: Window sill's are a bit high, appearance is a little slab sided, definitely need reversing camera.

Don't know how many gears the auto has, lost count, must be 5 or 6.

All up not a bad sort of car.

Didn't expect so many responses. :yes:

Cheers people.

Care to explain more in detail on the differences between VRX/GT vs ES/SX?

Dam about the tuning though... bummer.

Equipment options, quality of interior trim/seats, dash etc, body kit, muffler....

Never met a 380 owner, but anyone who's hired cars will have at some time driven one.

Always the same response.

Likes: Great highway cruiser, comfortable, power to spare, economical.

Dislikes: Window sill's are a bit high, appearance is a little slab sided, definitely need reversing camera.

Don't know how many gears the auto has, lost count, must be 5 or 6.

All up not a bad sort of car.

5 speed auto with a +/- gate that actually works the way they should, unlike Nissan's delay-o-matic

I'd agree with those responses except the reversing camera... sensors are enough (but if you need one, they are pretty cheap on eBay).

Edited by iamhe77

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...