Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello all, my first post here. I searched my questions for a few hours, Im hoping this isnt going to be repetative, I tried my best to make sure it isnt. I have a few questions in regards to the ECU's (ECCS) found in 89-90 model year R32 GTS-T and GTR's.

First question, I have learned there are 3 types of computers found in Skyline's. I was wondering which of the 3 are in the models I mentioned? The 3 I have read about are as follows: First type has two LEDs and five modes, second type has one LED and two modes and the thrid type has no LEDs, the output is done with the engine check light in the instrument cluster acting as a single LED ECU.

For the two turbo R32's, what sort of standalone systems are out there that offer relative ease of use. As plug-in play as possible. I know this has been discussed before, but Im still a bit lost. Does Apexi make a PFC, or can one from another engine be adapted? How programmable is the factory ECU? At what levels of power and modifications should a standalone be considered for the RB20DET?

My next question, how difficult is it to find a good used (or new if I can get it still) Electronic System Diagnosis Tester, in English if possible. I noticed there is a number in the R32 GTR service manual, EG1180-0000, would this be a Nissan part number? Is this devise compatiable with all RB ECCS's? And lastly, anybody have a clue roughly what this would cost new and or used?

My last question is in regards to the ATTESA and HICAS control moduals. I have yet to find this in the manual, but does anybody know the pin out wiring diagrams for these two?

Thank you much for any help!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39996-ecu-qs/
Share on other sites

At what levels of power and modifications should a standalone be considered
When your budget allows for it basically. The factory maps can nearly always be improved upon by an experienced tuner - every car of the same type leaves the factory with identical ECU maps, but each will have slightly different engine characteristics. This'll be exaggerated even more when you start doing exhausts/pods/boost or more, which takes the engine further and further from what the ECU was originally programmed for.

In a nutshell: You will more than likely gain power from a programmable ECU even in a stock car, particularly earlier models, but they really come into their own once you've started modifying.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39996-ecu-qs/#findComment-826105
Share on other sites

R32 ECU is reprogrammable, but by the sounds there wouldnt be too many workshops that know how to do this?

There is a power fc for R32 plugs straight in and comes preloaded with a base map so you can start and run the car without dramas.

The only Nissan consult I have seen cost the guy around $7K AUD second hand, so he told me.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/39996-ecu-qs/#findComment-826478
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...