Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Right then! I'm organising a cruise... who's in? It is only open to cars that have got PROOF of a SUB 12.5sec 1/4 pass  

Oh yeah... and it has to be a sub 12.5 on radial street tyres too!

Take the lead shall I? Did a sub 12.5 on the perished old S03s with 40psi in em at Heathcote. I really think it ran an 8.79 though....which makes me faster than Keir.

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Damn it! Ok then... ummm... ahhh I've got it! This cruise is only for red,white, blue and black cars that have done a sub 12.5sec 1/4 on radial tyres and the owner is right handed :P Have I excluded you yet Martin?

Guest Miss_Nismo

COPYME: Pawley reminded me that some time ago other members were organizing a cruise for the more “exclusive” skylines, so I guess you are not the first. However, my advice to you is perhaps you could PM the invites to the 33 and 34 drivers, as to avoid offending us more “lower class” drivers.

i did a 9.95 second pass through the Maccas drive through..

Must have been a long time ago, in another state, or at 4 am in the morn. :D i cant remember a what quick run through Maccas is like, since all these ppl are buying cereal and apples from the drive though its slowed to a snail pace....

Even KFC puts em to shame these days :D in and out in under a minute :)

i prefered to old method when u could get the food staight away. I mean whats the difference, the food will only make u sick in the end either way, so might aswell get it quicker :)

Ive actually started to consume less of that junk called fast food now anyway. My stomach is not too healthy if u know wat i mean.

Matt remember that time (at band camp lol)  i did a 9.95 second pass through the Maccas drive through.. does their receipt classify as as time slip?

Yeah I'll accept a Maccas receipt :(

Now, about that time at band camp?... :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...