Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmm I was sure I'd seen people plumb catch cans back into the sump, maybe it was after an oil air seperator.

Oil is just shell helix HX7 10-40, might be too thin?

That's not going to account for air in the sump, would a blocked pcv cause that though?

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes it would be the catch can plumbed back to the sump with a breather on top, maybe try 10-60 or 15-60, a blocked or broken PCV might be the cause especially on turbo cars, at least its easy to check it!

Edited by 51NNA

OK more info on this.

Replaced the leak down % gauge with a regular 0-150psi gauge.

Dialled in 20-40-60-80 and 100 psi inputs and no matter what input I put in, when connecting up to the spark plug hose BOTH gauges would always drop 5psi, as per usual the air can be felt leaving the dipstick.

This doesn't make sense to me, 5psi of 20 is a huge 25% drop but 5psi of 100 is obviously only 5%. Further to that, both gauges dropped down by the same amount, I'd have thought that the input pressure gauge should stay at the set pressure but how can that ever work if both gauges on the spark plug side of the regulator.

Of course the gauge is going to drop in pressure when connected as you've just opened up a larger volume of space for it to pressurise. Should both gauges be dropping like that?

Just buy a compression tester, rip all the plugs out first, start at 1 and work you're way back, crank it over 3 or 4 times and write down the results. Should be around 140-160 if a cyl is leaking it will show.

i bought a few of the leak down testers off ebay and they all were faulty.... 3 in fact. It turns out they were calibrated for "small engines" and the seller in china just thought removing the sticker would make it suitable for your average motor car..

bought one locally from snap on and it works perfectly.

Status I was thinking the same thing, low input pressures to set it implied it was for small engines, but I've replaced the leak down % gauge with another -150psi gauge so calibration is not an issue now.

A mechanic on another forum is telling me that on a good engine there should not be really notable air flow into the crankcase so that's enough info regardless of what the gauges say.

I'll have some more good data hopefully this evening when I can leak down test another mates rebuilt CA which makes good power so we know it's tight enough.

From there I can make a call, and it may just be turn down the boost a touch, run thicker oil and modify the catch setup to keep driving it.

As for the catch setup it's a standard exhaust cam into catch, catch into intake setup, no venting. (I have baffled it so it actually catches the oil...)

If I modify it I'll delete the PCV, pipe the intake into the catch also, plumb a drain into the catch back to the sump and vent the catch to atmo so the engine can breath back through it as needed.

I'm also considering one of these little guys to help sealing.

http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydisplay.asp?catcode=13023

OK more info.

Had my mate come over, and to correct a mistake I made earlier his SR only has fresh bearings, rings are 106ks.

We leak down tested his and then switched the second gauge on the tester and pumped 80psi into a cylinder, his came back with the same results mine had, about 20% on the leak down and notable air escaping from the dipstick/oil filler hole. Though I noticed his took a few seconds of pressuring at 80psi before the air escaping the dipstick etc was noticeable.

We warmed mine up and tested it again, same results as his. So I can only conclude that there is not enough solid data to pull it down.

On the catch can front, I've had an idea. As my can has an input into it from the exhaust side rocker and exits out into the intake like the factory setup, I'm wondering if the reason it's filling so quick is that the GT2560 on 17-18psi is generating enough vacuum in the intake pipe (where the catch can feeds back into) to draw more oil heavy vapours out of the rocker cover than it would with a factory turbo on stock boost.

I will test this by blocking that feed back into the intake and throwing it on the dyno with an empty catch.

^^ just had a thought... did you remove the big black baffle box that connects the crankcase to the rocker cover vent? if so put it back.

To be honest, I'm not sure what that is or where it would be on a CA, I don't recall seeing anything matching that description. The factory breather setup on a CA just goes from the exhaust rocker to the intake pipe in front of the turbo. Mine now has a baffled catch can between those points.

The water is probably leaking externally somewhere. CAs are notorious for headgasket water leaks.

I've had a solid look but that's not to say it isn't weeping onto the exhaust manifold and burning off or leaking down the back of the engine where it's impossible to see.

I had an oil leak at the back of the engine from the half moon seal and that's been fixed now so hopefully if it's leaking down the back I'll see it.

Any thoughts on my oil comments? turbo creating vacuum in the catch?

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok update time and good news.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

I disconnected the pipe from the catch to the intake pipe and went for a blast after emptying the catch. Came back with a clean catch this time.

So I'll get a filter for the exit of the catch can and block the intake port. Job done :D

If it is using it, then of course it wont.

I'll be watching it very closely to see if the level is dropping and requiring top up.

I'll also lay something down underneath it to make it easier to spot leaks.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

If that's the case, then maybe a there's a few kws to be had by improving the intake/filter. If the compressor sees a vacuum then it has to overcome that to get back to atmospheric pressure before it can make boost, so there'll be more heat in the compressed air and spool will be slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They also make them with the motor mounted on the side 
    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
    • I only recently purchased the vehicle, it came with the flex setup but the current tune is e85 only, which is why im wanting to get the tune redone to enable a mixture.  First i need to get the exhaust redone tho. I was thinking of getting a varex muffler but it sems they dont fit well in the 33 (hang low because of the valve mechanism which sticks out on top) and generally dont sound good. So that leaves me with redoing the entire exhaust (more resonators and mufflers) so its not a menace when i come and go from home, and then have the aes dump valve somewhere along the line to really open it up. I was thinking of having it before the cat but after seeing how insanely loud it will be (on a vl turbo) im thinking of putting it more towards the rear of the car, after one of the resonators. 
    • At this point I'm just 'hoping' it's the turbo seals. I did speak to someone who said it's normal for these turbos to have a bit of axial play? Not gonna lie I've never checked a turbo for axial play before but you could hear it tapping a bit as I moved it back and forth. Surely that's too much? My theory is (could be completely wrong), bad axial play, worn bearings, bad seals, oil into dump/compressor side, burns in exhaust = blue smoke. On a timing belt related note, my crank pulley was missing that front plate that sits in front of the timing belt. It's that metal round plate. It did have the rear one, and the woodruff keys are in the crank which was nice. Can anyone confirm if the NEO det engine has a front plate, im sure it would to protect the front of the timing belt or something. Water pumps...the pump I got was an NPW (yes grill me if I should've got a genuine one lol). It has a smooth mating surface, kit came with a pretty pathetic looking paper gasket. Do I need to use any RTV or just trust the gasket will work because its a smooth mating surface? Cheers legends have a good Easter break!
    • Cheers man, I thought the same.   Bit of an update on it all. It was definitely blue smoke, not grey after all. It didn't really smell oily but it was blue after all. Also puffing just the smallest amount on idle with no throttle.   I ended up pulling the intake and exhaust off and there was around 3mm of axial play on the turbo shaft. So I figured we'll that's buggered and sent it off to get hi-flowed at hypergear. Haven't got it back yet.   I haven't compression tested it yet. Had a look in the cylinder and cylinder 1 spark plug, looked a bit sooty but not oily. Then I've just started doing my timing belt because it's age is unknown.
×
×
  • Create New...