Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmm I was sure I'd seen people plumb catch cans back into the sump, maybe it was after an oil air seperator.

Oil is just shell helix HX7 10-40, might be too thin?

That's not going to account for air in the sump, would a blocked pcv cause that though?

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes it would be the catch can plumbed back to the sump with a breather on top, maybe try 10-60 or 15-60, a blocked or broken PCV might be the cause especially on turbo cars, at least its easy to check it!

Edited by 51NNA

OK more info on this.

Replaced the leak down % gauge with a regular 0-150psi gauge.

Dialled in 20-40-60-80 and 100 psi inputs and no matter what input I put in, when connecting up to the spark plug hose BOTH gauges would always drop 5psi, as per usual the air can be felt leaving the dipstick.

This doesn't make sense to me, 5psi of 20 is a huge 25% drop but 5psi of 100 is obviously only 5%. Further to that, both gauges dropped down by the same amount, I'd have thought that the input pressure gauge should stay at the set pressure but how can that ever work if both gauges on the spark plug side of the regulator.

Of course the gauge is going to drop in pressure when connected as you've just opened up a larger volume of space for it to pressurise. Should both gauges be dropping like that?

Just buy a compression tester, rip all the plugs out first, start at 1 and work you're way back, crank it over 3 or 4 times and write down the results. Should be around 140-160 if a cyl is leaking it will show.

i bought a few of the leak down testers off ebay and they all were faulty.... 3 in fact. It turns out they were calibrated for "small engines" and the seller in china just thought removing the sticker would make it suitable for your average motor car..

bought one locally from snap on and it works perfectly.

Status I was thinking the same thing, low input pressures to set it implied it was for small engines, but I've replaced the leak down % gauge with another -150psi gauge so calibration is not an issue now.

A mechanic on another forum is telling me that on a good engine there should not be really notable air flow into the crankcase so that's enough info regardless of what the gauges say.

I'll have some more good data hopefully this evening when I can leak down test another mates rebuilt CA which makes good power so we know it's tight enough.

From there I can make a call, and it may just be turn down the boost a touch, run thicker oil and modify the catch setup to keep driving it.

As for the catch setup it's a standard exhaust cam into catch, catch into intake setup, no venting. (I have baffled it so it actually catches the oil...)

If I modify it I'll delete the PCV, pipe the intake into the catch also, plumb a drain into the catch back to the sump and vent the catch to atmo so the engine can breath back through it as needed.

I'm also considering one of these little guys to help sealing.

http://moroso.com/catalog/categorydisplay.asp?catcode=13023

OK more info.

Had my mate come over, and to correct a mistake I made earlier his SR only has fresh bearings, rings are 106ks.

We leak down tested his and then switched the second gauge on the tester and pumped 80psi into a cylinder, his came back with the same results mine had, about 20% on the leak down and notable air escaping from the dipstick/oil filler hole. Though I noticed his took a few seconds of pressuring at 80psi before the air escaping the dipstick etc was noticeable.

We warmed mine up and tested it again, same results as his. So I can only conclude that there is not enough solid data to pull it down.

On the catch can front, I've had an idea. As my can has an input into it from the exhaust side rocker and exits out into the intake like the factory setup, I'm wondering if the reason it's filling so quick is that the GT2560 on 17-18psi is generating enough vacuum in the intake pipe (where the catch can feeds back into) to draw more oil heavy vapours out of the rocker cover than it would with a factory turbo on stock boost.

I will test this by blocking that feed back into the intake and throwing it on the dyno with an empty catch.

^^ just had a thought... did you remove the big black baffle box that connects the crankcase to the rocker cover vent? if so put it back.

To be honest, I'm not sure what that is or where it would be on a CA, I don't recall seeing anything matching that description. The factory breather setup on a CA just goes from the exhaust rocker to the intake pipe in front of the turbo. Mine now has a baffled catch can between those points.

The water is probably leaking externally somewhere. CAs are notorious for headgasket water leaks.

I've had a solid look but that's not to say it isn't weeping onto the exhaust manifold and burning off or leaking down the back of the engine where it's impossible to see.

I had an oil leak at the back of the engine from the half moon seal and that's been fixed now so hopefully if it's leaking down the back I'll see it.

Any thoughts on my oil comments? turbo creating vacuum in the catch?

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok update time and good news.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

I disconnected the pipe from the catch to the intake pipe and went for a blast after emptying the catch. Came back with a clean catch this time.

So I'll get a filter for the exit of the catch can and block the intake port. Job done :D

If it is using it, then of course it wont.

I'll be watching it very closely to see if the level is dropping and requiring top up.

I'll also lay something down underneath it to make it easier to spot leaks.

I think my theory about the turbo creating vacuum in the catch can might be on the money.

If that's the case, then maybe a there's a few kws to be had by improving the intake/filter. If the compressor sees a vacuum then it has to overcome that to get back to atmospheric pressure before it can make boost, so there'll be more heat in the compressed air and spool will be slower.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A realistic expectattion of how long it has to last also comes down to.... when do you think you will be banned from registering and driving old petrol powered shitters? It's 27 years since that thing was built. It probably rusted out 15 years ago. It was probably repaired and looked OK for another 10. If you do a similarish bodge job now, or perhaps slightly better with some actual rust conversion and glassing, then.... get another 10-15 years out of it, after which you'll only be permitted by the CCP to drive electric cars manufactured in their Shenzen zone anyway. 
    • Let me assume that the concern over a manual ECU is that the NeoDET that you have was an auto and has an auto ECU. That ECU will not be a problem, but you WILL have to Nistune it. And you would have to Nistune it even if you had a manual ECU, because the turbo ECUs will shit the bed if they do not have all the things that they were told they have to have, to be happy. The big one being the TCS CU, which you won't have in your car. Anyway, with an auto ECU (which I have running my originally auto NeoDET in an R32) Nistune allows you to put in a Stagea image which doesn't panic about the absent TCS, and allows you to override a whle bunch of other annoyances that would otherwise see the check engine light on 100% of the time. Also, you can't wind up the power very far on the stock NeoDET ECUs without Nistune, because the boost sensor gets in the way. Nistune allows you to push that problem much further up the dial. Do you even have the boost sensor with the engine? Without it, you are SOL and will need an aftermarket ECU (or to find a sensor somewhere, god knows where). I can't tell you what the wiring loom differences are in a 34. But what Duncan said above needs to be considered. When you say "loom", does that include the transmission loom? Because you will need to swap out the auto tranny loom for the equivalent manual loom, and get rid of the neutral/park start interlock (basically hot wire it).
    • I have had the r3c in for years now, maybe close to 7 years and it has never missed a beat, anyone can drive it. Super easy to drive around town, the hotter it gets does get a little hard but it holds the power easy as 
    • Shit thing to find eh? I guess the big issue is that whatever "fix" you do now, it might slow the rust down but won't fix it. I just wanted to add that in no way is fixing sheet metal in 3 dimensions the place to start with welding....that is a pro only job because its too hard to work out where things should be, let alone doing a clean enough job that it can look OK and still be strong too.  I needed to get a new rear quarter panel on the GTR and it took a pro weeks to get the old one off cleanly, new one on in the right place and looking somewhat like it should have with most of the previous connecting panels in place. Gluing a couple of bits of metal together with a welder in the garage is doable, but that is totally different to doing panel  replacement
    • This seems to be a very popular swap since all the turbo skyline prices went through the roof! I'll let someone more familiar chime in, but I understand that yes you probably want to swap the loom in to swap out the auto TCM stuff. You should not assume everything just plugs in either, you need to check at least the ECU wiring diagram for any differences at the plug at the left headlight and probably the ones near the ECU that join the dash loom too  
×
×
  • Create New...