Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I removed the roof rails off my 260RS today, looks heaps better.

tools needed are:

  • Small flat head screw driver
  • phillips screw driver
  • 12mm long socket (preferrably 1/4 inch drive)
  • 14mm spanner
  • 1/4 inch drive rachet & extensions
  • Gentle hands

remove the rear section of the hood lining then just let the front section drop down. u only need enough room to squeeze ur 12mm socket & extensions up to undo the nuts that hold the rails on. there are 10 all up. u'll need the long socket for the 4 at the rear.

post-86035-0-29104900-1339398621_thumb.jpg

once all the nuts are undone, pull the rails off, they may need a little assistance as the have been on there a long time.

now that the rails are off u'll be left with 6 rectangular holes in the panels which will need to be filled ( will update this when i have done it.)

post-86035-0-35827200-1339399102_thumb.jpg

post-86035-0-07038500-1339399169_thumb.jpg

post-86035-0-18484800-1339399255_thumb.jpg

post-86035-0-66054100-1339399335_thumb.jpg

u also have 10 holes in the roof which will need blocking off so ur roof don't leak! I'm planning on using some stainless cap head bolts and washers and some rubber washers as well as a bit of sikaflex just to make shure.

will post more pics and update topic when i have finished it, public holiday so bolt shop is closed today.

post-86035-0-13463300-1339399645_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/402285-removed-c34-roof-rails/
Share on other sites

You have the easy bit done.

Are you going to remove the factory strips to modify them or do it on the car?

Just a heads up, the factory strips are double sided taped the entire length along the outside of the car

The inside entire length clips into a nylon strip that is double sided taped onto the roof

It is very hard to remove the factory strip without bending them. So take your time

How do you plan to modify them?

They are stainless steel coated in rubber/plastic.

Darren! Was planning on leaving the factory ones on the car, tac in some stainless fillers then use body filler, give them a rub back prime & paint on the car! Don't know if it will work but only one way to find out

  • 2 weeks later...

I done this to my Stagea today. I had to take out the whole hood lining out as mine got the the sun roofs, had to take off a bracket to get to the nuts.

This is how mine looks.... It does look hell alot better.

181873_10151872870100054_562082104_n.jpg

547166_10151872870245054_71775175_n.jpg

319698_10151872868660054_621212237_n.jpg

i wouldnt recommend modifying the stock ones on the car. as Darrin said they are rubber coated and held in with double sided tape. which means when u try and weld them the rubber and tape will melt. which will mean u'll have to take all the rubber off to get an even finish. this may also cause the roof to leak as there will be 10 holes into the cabin under the strips. as for stagea_dayz's suggestion of bogging it up, you will need atleast 3 whole containers of bog to do it! because once you take off the stainless steel strips theres a HUGE gap to be filled. i'd suggest to completely remove the stock ones BEFORE you modify them or do as i did and throw them away and sheet metal over the gap then fill and paint. but the latter will require the roof to be painted.

Edited by Raysboostin

Just a thought I had when I saw this.

How about hacking the bottom visible 3mm off of the rails (off the car), using that as a base to smooth something over.

I imagine it wont be flush and will probably look like 6 cover plates bolted in but using Nissan seals to fill a Nissan hole should stop leakage issue.

Should even be able leave the strips in place.

Be a quick solution whilst working on a bigger, better all encompassing one.

I dont want to be the first to cut my rails up though..... :)

I done this to my Stagea today. I had to take out the whole hood lining out as mine got the the sun roofs, had to take off a bracket to get to the nuts.

This is how mine looks.... It does look hell alot better.

181873_10151872870100054_562082104_n.jpg

547166_10151872870245054_71775175_n.jpg

319698_10151872868660054_621212237_n.jpg

can you post a close up shot of the rectangular holes??? Not too close but from like 1m away. im thinking of giving this a go. :-D
  • 2 weeks later...

Browsing the net today and found these

http://usa.auto-styl..._word&limit_car[]=2411&limit_genre[]=18K&set=0&page=1&max=10&car_url=c34stagia

Link didn't work but I geuss you mean this - =2411&limit_genre[]=18K&set=0&page=1&max=10&car_url=c34stagia"]roof bar cover

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...