Jump to content
SAU Community

Thinking Of Buying An R35...key Differences Between My09, 10, 11 & 12?


Marko R1
 Share

Recommended Posts

It is a good topic Ryan & as we both well know, the effort required to crack the 400awkw mark with an RB requires a long list of mod parts which is a convoluted pain in the butt!

The R35GTR on the other hand achieves this with a midpipe, cobb & intake...this for me is 1 of the major attractions of the new generation GTR (alongside the other technological advancements it has to offer)

Chalk & Cheeeeeese :starwars:

Edited by Marko R1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The R35GTR on the other hand achieves this with a midpipe, cobb & intake...this for me is 1 of the major attractions of the new generation GTR (alongside the other technological advancements it has to offer)

not quite

you'll need the sugar juice (which also means injectors + pumps) to crack 400

or you can just ask the tuner to turn their dyno up to 11

i made 388 awkw with 98ron and full bolt on's on Martin's heartbreaker mainline

dyno_01.jpg

Edited by domino_z
Link to comment
Share on other sites

mainline from what ive experienced personally are relatively tough in terms of dyno numbers

your boost pressure seems very low (16psi?) - is this due to the fact that you dont want to run a higher boost/keeping it safe?

btw - those torque numbers are MONSTROUS, thank you Mr Capacity :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

torque numbers wouldn't be corrected i dont think

re boost i left all that to Martin's tuning - pretty sure that's all you can ask of the stock turbos to keep them within their safe operating limits

my cobb accessport datalogs show boost peaking at 18+psi

Edited by domino_z
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 pound would be high boost for stock turbos and that is pretty much every bolt on you can do - downpipes, midpipe, exhaust, injectors, intake, turbo inlet pipes, fuel pumps, bovs.

there's more headroom in those mods but limit is now the stock turbo

....maybe minimal gains by switching to a speed density dyno tune which is my next move

Edited by domino_z
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit late to the party but I agree.

For me, the factors for my purchase was (in order of importance): Price - Condition - Colour

I have an 09 and personally it doesn't phase me that I don't have some of the luxuries such as auto lights/wipers etc. I currently have them on my BMW and I currently have them set to Off.

IMO, the MFD would be the biggest reason for justifying the 10 over the 09 but I did not see the need (based on what I was looking for in a car) and rather spend them on other things. Resale was also not a priority as it is used as a DD so I am prepared to have higher KMs and less resale value later down the track anyways.

I still have a few more months of warranty left (late 09 model) and then will tune and mod further (itching to as I am now already used to the car/power). I personally wouldn't be able to justify voiding the warrany on a 10/11 (assuming it has another 1--2 years of warranty left) in case something breaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bit late to the party but I agree.

For me, the factors for my purchase was (in order of importance): Price - Condition - Colour

I have an 09 and personally it doesn't phase me that I don't have some of the luxuries such as auto lights/wipers etc. I currently have them on my BMW and I currently have them set to Off.

IMO, the MFD would be the biggest reason for justifying the 10 over the 09 but I did not see the need (based on what I was looking for in a car) and rather spend them on other things. Resale was also not a priority as it is used as a DD so I am prepared to have higher KMs and less resale value later down the track anyways.

I still have a few more months of warranty left (late 09 model) and then will tune and mod further (itching to as I am now already used to the car/power). I personally wouldn't be able to justify voiding the warrany on a 10/11 (assuming it has another 1--2 years of warranty left) in case something breaks.

is there a visual comparison of the 09 MFD v's 10 MFD? I'd like to see the actual difference here...is it just the resolution quality or is there a functional/feature difference as well?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not quite

you'll need the sugar juice (which also means injectors + pumps) to crack 400

or you can just ask the tuner to turn their dyno up to 11

i made 388 awkw with 98ron and full bolt on's on Martin's heartbreaker mainline

Hey Domino, just curious with the full bolt ons 388kw is good but theres plenty of US tuners on NAGTROC pulling over 400 with same mods

Out of interest have you taken it out to the strip to see what numbers you can pull?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

chief difference is the dyno's and corrections used for the marketing thread glory on nagtroc - bigger is better and sells as such

car's are also quicker down the strip/in mags given all the correction factors, roll-out etc used

here's a dyno log Martin did with US style correction factors - full bolt on e85 producing a US tuner like ~670awhp

dyno_02.jpg

Edited by domino_z
Link to comment
Share on other sites

chief difference is the dyno's and corrections used for the marketing thread glory on nagtroc - bigger is better and sells as such

I remember when we were the first in the world to run an 11 second pass in an SST transmission Evo X

Some of the guys on US message boards were adamant it was simple in Australia as due to our equatorial proximity, and being upside down, everything weighed less in Australia. True :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin your key advantage was that the fuel was being pushed through the injectors in a clockwise flow rate due to the coriolis effect... and every tuner knows clockwise fuel flow gives you better 60ft times

I called one tuner (forum sponsor) out for dyno'ing his gtr in rwd only and he argued it made no difference to power figures - he was consequently rejoiced and hailed as the second coming for just cracking 1000awhp on a dyno with the least amount of mods - sales would have spiked that week

So does my car make 422awkw on e85 or as per doctor'd graph above 499awkw on e85 - that's up to the op

Edited by domino_z
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is the limiting factor on the OEM turbos running up to 18psi? Do they simply loose efficiency due to their size?

I am guessing that they steel wheel/ball bearing units

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my mate just bought a new my2012 gtr in black - picks it up tomorrow.

he is going to take me for a drive but i told him not to bother until its run-in (needs to put 2000km on it) - he has a heavy foot & highly skilled driver (races a superlap r32gtr)

might be my biggest mistake going in this car as it will expedite my upgrade path hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he is going to take me for a drive but i told him not to bother until its run-in (needs to put 2000km on it)

I've just done 2000kms on mine, seems to rattle just the same as when I bought it with 43kms on the clock.. These cars are run in on the track @ Nissan before they're exported.. you do realise that don't you :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In that case, I better remind him :)

Of course Nissan recommends you follow their break-in proceedure, but no harm in a little spirited driving as well. Probably the only thing I didn't do during the first 2000kms was launch it. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not quite

you'll need the sugar juice (which also means injectors + pumps) to crack 400

or you can just ask the tuner to turn their dyno up to 11

i made 388 awkw with 98ron and full bolt on's on Martin's heartbreaker mainline

Is it possible to crack 400awkw's with the DBA's on 98/100PULP - didn't get get slightly bigger turbos then CBA's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well I had 2 choices from then on. I either had to (reluctantly) move it on to another potential buyer and take the loss on the chin. Or I stick with it and turn it into a restoration project. I chose the latter. Project Snowstorm began! The frp body kit was the first thing to go. Turns out the original colour used to be silver. The Neo and gearbox were removed, along with the prop and exhaust system before it took a trip to the bodyshop, where I wouldn’t see it again for quite some time due to the pandemic hitting very soon after they took it away. Eventually, progress began and damage assessments made. Even the front chassis leg was in pretty bad shape!     Then the chopping commenced. For these guys it was just usual routine, to me it looked absolutely terrifying!   More to follow as I’m struggling to focus on my screen at 12:45 am!!!
    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
×
×
  • Create New...