Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

As there was a bit of talk lately about Mech keyboards and what not in a couple of threads...

A great guide/info to help you decide what might be best for you if you didn't already know about it:

http://www.overclock.net/t/491752/mechanical-keyboard-guide#post6009418

Just remember when it comes to the models, it does not list everything. Whilst the thread does get updated, i know there are other brands available out there over and above whats in the list.

I'm going to grab a new keyboard i think in the near future, so refreshing my memory by reading this was handy :)

On the subject of keyboards, anybody know of any keyboard that is bulid like a tank like one of those old school IBM ones?

Think I must have destoryed 3 K/Bs already everytime I rage quit...

A G110 isn't a mech keyboard...

I mean my G15 has taken a pounding as well, even taken a few beers being poured over it and still works...

But i use my mech board @ work, and then am resentful going home to a dome/membrane keyboard as the mech is soooo much nicer.

Like they say, once you've had black

:D

  • 4 weeks later...

razer black widow ultimate i regret my purchase as there are better keyboards about but its still readlly nice some of the gaming lock out functions are good but there are still better about

I just got one of these today.. It was between this one and the Steelseries 7G for me.

I chose the Black Widow because the keys are back-lit, and because it has the 'clicky' blue cherry switches, which I like the feel of. The Steelseries has brown switches which are similar in feel but lack the click.

It's a noisy bastard though, hahah!

  • 3 weeks later...

Mech keyboards FTW!

I'm running 2 on my PCs, main rig's got a Ducky DK 1008L(brown cherry) while the download rig's got a Filco Majestouch Ninja(black cherry).

Love em to bits!

+1 for mechanical keyboards, I have 3 now, 1 brown for work, 1 black for home, and 1 red for LANs.

If anyone is wondering what colour switch to get and you don't know anyone with one to test, start with an brown I reckon, good all rounder

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...