Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was told by a mate that I should replace the stock pipe from my AFM to my turbo with a solid metal pipe as apparently the stock rubber one will actually suck inwards when my turbo boosts up. Especially now that I've got an aftermarket turbo and running more boost.

What are your opinions on this? Is it worthwhile? I guess any exhaust shop/speed shop would be able to make this pipe up?

Car is R33 GTS-t

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40401-metal-vs-stock-afm-pipe/
Share on other sites

Hi,

I was told by a mate that I should replace the stock pipe from my AFM to my turbo with a solid metal pipe as apparently the stock rubber one will actually suck inwards when my turbo boosts up. Especially now that I've got an aftermarket turbo and running more boost.

What are your opinions on this? Is it worthwhile? I guess any exhaust shop/speed shop would be able to make this pipe up?

Car is R33 GTS-t

Cheers!

A lot of turbo intake tubing has a spiral wire in it to stop this from happening. Some people remove it because they think it wil improve flow, not realising that they are achieving the opposite. Unless you are having air flow limitation issues, in which case you probably need to look at the intake system as a whole (no pun intended!), save yourself the hassle.

On the R33 gtst the spiral rubber tube is very similar to the VL turbo unit. If you bin it and replace it with a metal or PVC pipe (cheaper) you may expect 7hp+ gain on the factory turbo. Thats more power than from upgrading the airfilter.

The metal spiral is to help stop the pipe from colapsing, the rasied bumpy ridges that go with them are to allow for pipe flex movement and they are the part of the design that sucks or should I say prevents suck.

PVC pipe and a heat gun and some rubber elbows will do the job.

Is their a particular boost level or engine power output where this problem starts to occur or is it more of a case by case basis ?

My experience has been it is more of a question of "age and condition" than boost or power level. I have had a 210 rwkw (1 bar) car suck it closed and I had a 260 rwkw (1.3 bar) one that didn't. I have not ever seen a problem at 200 rwkw or less, so if you are under that it is probably OK.

Sydneykid, what air filters were they running?

My thinking... :) there is no way air flow makes the inlet pipe collapse (physics i suppose), so its not boost or turbo size related. So its the vacuum from the turbo, but in order for their to be a vacuum in the inlet system there must be a restriction upstream, ie the filter

If there is an open pipe (ie no filter) then you will never see the pipe collapse. Now obviously there has to be some sort of pressure drop accross the filter (i suppose we are aiming for negligible), but perhaps by sticking with the same filter that causes the std pipe to collapse, but replacing with aluminium pipe etc... then its actually a band aid fix for a shoddy/dirty air filter that is causing an inlet restriction -> vacuum->pipe collapse. Get a better air filter free up the restriction and there wont be a vacuum in the inlet...

Dont knoe how true the above is, just soem thoughts... thinking can be a dangerous thing with a hangover. :headspin:

Dont forget Roy, it gets bloody hot in the engine bay, considering the pipe is right next to the turbo so it could soften quite a bit methinks. My SR20 doesnt have a spiral wire to help support it but I still think its strong enough to prevent collapsing. But one thing for sure, it has all those corrugated surfaces and irregular diameter which would hurt flow by quite a bit. (BUt still not as restrictive as the pesky 50mm SR20 AFM!) So I think it would be worth replacing with a mandrel bent pipe to address those problems, especially if you upgrade to a Z32 AFM/bigger turbo.

Yeh, but even if the thing gets hot a malleable (spelling?), you still need negative pressure/vacuum fo rthe pipee to be sucked closed. Eleminate the negative pressure and the pipe cannot physically be sucked in/collapse.

As for replacing yeh sure, go ahead, just making the point that the cause coulc be an inlet tract problem that may be costing you power...a metal pipe is a fix, but perhaps not a fix to the actual problem...just a means of masking the pobolem.

forget the pipe collapsing issue for a moment (it does happen, possibly due to the rubber getting old). The extra power I mention is to do with the airlow restriction the factory unit has vs a good replacement pipe, on a stock turbo at factory levels of boost. More power is at stake when you up the base performance.

So its the vacuum from the turbo, but in order for their to be a vacuum in the inlet system there must be a restriction upstream, ie the filter

If there is an open pipe (ie no filter) then you will never see the pipe collapse. Now obviously there has to be some sort of pressure drop accross the filter (i suppose we are aiming for negligible), but perhaps by sticking with the same filter that causes the std pipe to collapse, but replacing with aluminium pipe etc... then its actually a band aid fix for a shoddy/dirty air filter that is causing an inlet restriction -> vacuum->pipe collapse. Get a better air filter free up the restriction and there wont be a vacuum in the inlet...

My thoughts are that the pipe itself is a restriction and hence creating vacuum.

So I am guessing if you truely want minimal vacuum you would run no intake piping at all, just open air turbo. But we dont live in a perfect world.

Adam

My thoughts are that the pipe itself is a restriction and hence creating vacuum.

So I am guessing if you truely want minimal vacuum you would run no intake piping at all, just open air turbo. But we dont live in a perfect world.

Adam

the pipe itself can't be the restriction, as was said, you would need a restriction upstream, ie air filter to cause a vacuum in the pipe and collapse it.

(start motivational talk) I think it's a great idea to replace the rubber pipe, it would be very easy to make up a steel pipe composing of a few bends and straight bits of pipe, joined with silicone joiners and hose clamps. All we would need is one person to make up a couple of sketches with seperate pipes with lengths and bends required and it would be a make it yourself kit for everyone to use. (end motivational talk)

:D

Im not saying dont replace the pipe, im just saying be sure your air filter isnt the reason its happening.

Imagine the flexi hose part on your vacuum cleaner at home. Turn the thing on and the hose is fine...cup your hand over the end of it and it will want to suck close....now getting rid of that flexi pipe and using metal tube will stop the tendency for the pipe to collapse, but doesnt remove the restriction my cupped hand places on the inlet.

Is my analogy make any sense?

Im not saying dont replace the pipe, im just saying be sure your air filter isnt the reason its happening.    

Imagine the flexi hose part on your vacuum cleaner at home. Turn the thing on and the hose is fine...cup your hand over the end of it and it will want to suck close....now getting rid of that flexi pipe and using metal tube will stop the tendency for the pipe to collapse, but doesnt remove the restriction my cupped hand places on the inlet.

Is my analogy make any sense?

I totally agree, but I also think it is a god idea to change the pipe as the corrugations in the rubber pipe around the bend, can't be too good for the flow.

Also, the cast piece at the end of the pipe from the intercooler to turbo intake looks tiny in my opinion - it's gotta go.

So the consensus is that it's probably worthwhile anyway, regardless of whether there is a restriction further up the line. However, the restriction should also be addressed by fitting faster flowing filter.

So that leads onto is there a proven brand of filter which flows well but still filters things smaller than a bird (unlike HKS)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
    • If you think that's harsh, go experience a KAAZ 🥲 Thoughts and prayers for Dose. I had mine modified by a diff shop to make it less brutal, no idea what they did but it's not as brutal as before. The Asian in me was being tight before and went KAAZ instead of a Nismo, lesson learned.
    • From what I understand, the normal Nismo diff is a bit harsh, and the Pro is the one that behaves more nicely, and you only pay Nismo tax twice to get it.
×
×
  • Create New...