Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ethanol is becoming the fuel of choice for turbo applications, of that there is little doubt.

For a number of people, it would seem, the only thing holding them back from going down the ethanol path is availability. As sourcing this fuel becomes easier more people will want to go down the E path, myself included. One thing I know I am finding difficult is souring a succinct database of everything ethanol related. There's lots of information on here regarding ethanol, but it tends to be spread all over the place. I figure a number of people are in the same boat as me, interested in ethanol but find getting the right information difficult.

Hence this thread - a central place for questions and answers, explanations, examples and outcomes of all thing ethanol related.

To start things off, what I'd be interested in is a complete ethanol solution. I'm currently running a RB25 neo, and will be upgrading injectors (ID1000s), turbo (HG) and fuel pump soon. I have a PFC already. What would the best way to go about going the ethanol path while still having the ability to run other fuels? I'm interested in an ethanol content meter and datalogit. It'd be nice to have multiple maps which I could switch between depending on ethanol content.

Who's doing it, how have you set it up, what did it cost, what have the results been like, what would/will you change and so on?

What other questions, tips, tricks or suggestions do people have in regards to switching to ethanol?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/404471-the-complete-ethanol-thread/
Share on other sites

Place the power FC in the bin and buy a ECU that can accept an Ethanol Content Sensor. Most if not all decent ECU's will do it.

ECU alone, it cost roughly $700 for the hardware (lines, sensor, display, fittings). You then have the dyno time (which is where the money is). My own car, I think we had 7 different maps which and it adjusted to suit. No laptops, no plugging this in and checking that, just fill and go!

We started off with a E85 map and kept adding petrol. Every 15% of ethanol we would save a map.

Place the power FC in the bin and buy a ECU that can accept an Ethanol Content Sensor. Most if not all decent ECU's will do it.

ECU alone, it cost roughly $700 for the hardware (lines, sensor, display, fittings). You then have the dyno time (which is where the money is). My own car, I think we had 7 different maps which and it adjusted to suit. No laptops, no plugging this in and checking that, just fill and go!

We started off with a E85 map and kept adding petrol. Every 15% of ethanol we would save a map.

Ideally that's what I'd like to do. What ECU do you use?

Link G4 plug in. However, Autronic SM4 and the Haltechs (not sure if it's model specific) can do it too. I'd assume the Motec's can too but tr amount of people running these are next to none.

Is this going on a GTR? If so, by the time you buy the FC and AFM's you're a few hundred $ below a G4 anyway. It's a no brainer

Going onto an RB25 neo.

I've already got an FC, but would swap it out for something more capable of running multiple maps/adjustment for varying ethanol levels or 98.

Yea might give him a call

This thread is a good idea though. Alot of people starting to get into ethanol, the more people the better!!

We should make a sticky/register for places to buy E85 in each state that can be updated by mods as well

I ditched power FC and went Haltech PS2000 wire in, ethanol sensor and wideband then full flex tune... Very expensive path... Worth it for regular driving tho :)

Regrets, not using boost control with Haltech, instead I opted for a HKS EVC which is proving to be sh*t so far :/

I've got some questions too.

My GT-R's just about back on the road and it's got all the usual basics from my last build.

Built motor, -7's, 3" turbo back exhaust, power fc, 550 sard injectors and a walbro.

I know i can probably make around the 300kw mark with what i have on 98 but would it be worth switching to E85 for a bit more power and the other benefits that come with the fuel?

I know i'll need a bigger fuel pump and injectors but would my exhaust also be holding the car back a bit?

I was just planing on running straight United E85 as i have plenty of local pumps.

What are peoples thoughts? Worth it or not?

My Adaptronic 440 does it too and was half the price of your fancy haltech :P

Also plugged straight in and has built in map...but seems most tuners aren't keen on them yet, still no idea why. NKOTB issue maybe.

cost of my entire engine managementAdaptronic 1200$ (hypergear)Mac solenoid 55$ (eBay)AIT sensor 40$ (repco)That's 1300 for a setup that will do damn near everything the big names will..add an E-sensor for what 300$ and a wideband for 220$ and I still haven't spent 2k..

Go link G4 otherwise..

My Adaptronic 440 does it too and was half the price of your fancy haltech :P

Also plugged straight in and has built in map...but seems most tuners aren't keen on them yet, still no idea why. NKOTB issue maybe.

cost of my entire engine managementAdaptronic 1200$ (hypergear)Mac solenoid 55$ (eBay)AIT sensor 40$ (repco)That's 1300 for a setup that will do damn near everything the big names will..add an E-sensor for what 300$ and a wideband for 220$ and I still haven't spent 2k..

Go link G4 otherwise..

Is that a Stao supplied one?

Wait, you answered that a bit further on :)

Happy with the Adaptronic? Are you running E85 at the moment?

FYI, Eltham United is listed as having E85 on the United website, but they do not and will not. They dug up the forecourt to install the pumps and line then figured out they have fibreglass tanks. So no E85, ever, at Eltham :( that's dinted my E85 ambitions and made a setup which can handle both 98 and 85 a must.

Damn, I ran out last time I was in Campbelfield getting a tune and thought I could make it there. Its lucky I didn't rely on that servo for a fill.

I will probably be heading down the flex sensor path soon, not sure how I will go as I am using the Fcon, hopefully there is a 0-5V input spare...

i know very little bout E85 but from what ive read, the mixture under load doesnt require the same enrichment as normal 98fuel, so is it really that critical to have a different map for the varying percentages.. is it not accurate enough to just tune the car slightly rich to compensate for differing concentrations??

my tuner says he can tune the car with safety to account for lower percentages that may occur at different pumps, so is it really that significant that you need ethanol sensors and to even swap computers for this?

:ph34r:

Edited by SliverS2

i know very little bout E85 but from what ive read, the mixture under load doesnt require the same enrichment as normal 98fuel, so is it really that critical to have a different map for the varying percentages.. is it not accurate enough to just tune the car slightly rich to compensate for differing concentrations??

my tuner says he can tune the car with safety to account for lower percentages that may occur at different pumps, so is it really that significant that you need ethanol sensors and to even swap computers for this?

:ph34r:

For E85 and E0? No.

Between E85 and E '70' that Caltex's "Flex fuel". Yes. I did that for 12 months myself.

Seeing that many guys will be going down this path, a parts list might be in order.

- 1 x Ethanol Content Sensor (GM part - Made by Siemens) http://www.zeitronix...r/order.htm#ECA

flex-fuel-sensor.gif

- 1 x wiring harness from sensor to ECU -or- to Digital -> Analogue ethanol content analyser.

FF_Cnctr_148x50.gif

FF-Cable-66x148.gif

- 1 x ECU. Link, Vipec, Autronic SM4 (Unigroup got that working on one of their cars), Haltech, Motec would all have a ECU that can do it. Power FC CANNOT!

- 1 x Extra wiring harness in the Link G4's case. (Order this when ordering your Link)

- Some extra Fuel lines, braided lines, fittings etc to hook up the sensor to the Fuel lines. I put mine on the return line and have a "tee" in and out branching off the main return. Works fine.

* Optional is the Ethanol Display.

ECA-red_180x131.gif

It's $200. I find it handy, especially when tuning, not to mention it's interesting to see what you're actually getting from the pump!

I'm not sure the Haltech can do that. They can't do aftermarket trigger input from a hall effect sensor in their 'Pro' model or closed loop boost control over wheel speed so I'm pretty sure they wouldn't be able to handle something like that? Can anyone confirm?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...