Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Why do people/organisations still use/rely on the body mass index scale to determine if someone is overweight or unhealthy etc?

Dividing your height by your weight doesn't tell anything about your body composition, fitness level or physical aptitude...

Here is an example of how flawed this scale is:

252597_10150963233779370_1662799186_n.jpg

Edited by GHOSTrun

It's pretty well known that BMI is useless for athletes and anyone with more than an average amount of muscle, in much the same way that cheap scales proclaiming to measure body fat are...because they basically use a BMI to calculate it.

Hmmmm, personally speaking we never use BMI anymore, but if we are just wanting to do a general analysis of an obese person it can assist. Of course the same cant be used for an athlete with high muscle volume etc as the pic showed above. ( P.S. i really liked that pic you posted Ghost run, sums it up nicely.)

Not many (if any) fitness proffesionals use BMI anymore, except for what i mentioned. scales, calipers and blood pressure normally gets the point through

But good question, I dont know why doctors are? you will find the more newer docs in the industry are using "Tanita" style scales that assist in taking Body Fat percentages for you in under a minute. I personally dont see doctors over here still using BMI unless if physically overweight/obese.

You can always use the fat calipers (pinch test) but of course inaccuracy can show easily should two different PT's do it, eg scapula is a common mistake area.

There is advantages to it for people who are overweight and could be at risk, a simple graph showing the general population then where they are at could be effective in creating pain to motivate said person. We still have one of these in our PT office to assist clients who may have high needs.

I stil remember watching the Louie Theraux documentary on body builders when he says "Are body builders not fit then?" and the trainer said "Oh absolutely, in a different way but they are still unfit"

There is parallels in extreme obesity and extreme body building - stretch marks, pressure on the heart, difficulties in running, chaffing. obviously things such as diabetes is reduced but I am sure i could bring up some more parralells for both the extremes.

It's not just disadvantageous to people with high muscle mass (and heavy), it also effects people who are extremely lean, eg. <10% bf at average proportions still puts you around BMI of 25 which is the start of "obese".

My interest is because according to posts from other users on another forum, major organisations such as the defence forces, the police force, paramedics etc still use BMI as a measure. Just dumbfounded how such a useless scale can be used in seemingly some important roles as a measure.

Edited by GHOSTrun

Defense use it as a measure yes, but it's not a deciding factor - there is much more they take into account and if you are over on BMI it's not critically important.

I know as my best mate is around 105kg and 5'8", but he is as wide as a house

  • 2 months later...

As a former doctor in the Army the first post says it all. Other measurements the key one being waistline were made during a medical and that sort sit out. In my current clinical practice with both sexes I prefer waistline, or with women dress size they fit into, as the progress measurement over using weight.If you generate muscle mass it is burning calories even when "not in use".

Edited by DR 32R

most nrl football players come back as obese according to the BMI. It is widely considered to be totall b/s these days, however to answer OPs question. It is hard to change a train of thought over night.

Not really so to speak,

Although the military and doctors used it for sometime, it was originally used to assist in the study of statistics of mass populus. Hence the reason for its inaccuracies on individuals

Then again schools could be considered a mass populous.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

At 5'10" and 90kgs I'm Probley considered close to death or some crap. I don't believe the body mass index to be correct.

I have a good deal of muscle mass and consider myself quite fit so who cares what ur bmi is :)

Edited by Nikk_666

At 5'10" and 90kgs I'm Probley considered close to death or some crap. I don't believe the body mass index to be correct.

I have a good deal of muscle mass and consider myself quite fit so who cares what ur bmi is :)

Jealous on height vs. weight! At my peak, I only could manage 92kg and I'm 6 ft tall. I was eating like a pig, taking creatine, 3x protein shakes a day, multivitamins, and flaxseed oil

Not sure if trolling or if srs.

being serious, I want to weigh more, i.e. more muscle mass.. I've got a shitty small frame so it's hard to gain weight. I was 92kg and now I'm only 84kg because I've removed all carbs from my diet to shred up

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing. Especially at idle, changing the cam angle by that much could be spewing more fuel out the exhaust courtesy of everything happening that bit later. More fuel also means more air (if the fuel didn't burn, then neither did the O2) and so the O2 sensors can start to tell interesting but misleading stories. And the specifics of what is happening could easily be affected by everything else you changed as well. And it could be dynamic, where a few revs more or less could somewhat change how the engine is breathing.
    • Good idea on the temp probe. The mv readings of the O2 sensors are very similar to one another, as is the injector pw. I went through logs in the past to see if there was a discrepancy and there is. Because they alternate up and down as narrowbands do.. they do often 'switch' as to which one is more. They were never 20%+ (more like 1-2%) so it's possible the difference between 20 and 15-17% is a similar discrepancy to 2.0% and 1.7% which I wouldn't have really noticed in the past. We did think about spacing the strut brace. Unfortunately the ~20mm that the GTR brace is lower than the GTT brace is effectively what you need to clear the vents. Moving it up would make it very uncomfortable, but it's plausible that 10mm is a unhappy medium between both hard places... The good news is.. using MR HAMMER it was actually pretty easy to bend back the bent bits to make sure the guard and headlight/new headlight tabs line up right. Yes, we used a R34 GTR guard to make sure the bolt holes all lined up with a known straight guard. As above, you can see the side skirt and the GTR guard are not meant to play together, but everyone seems to think this is a simple fix to the point where nobody who has had these talk to one another mentions how... ...so I'll just assume they know how to fix it when it comes to paint jail time again. Whoever they are. Nobody returns my calls. There's so much changed with regard to the ECU and the car.. that the next step really is to connect the scanner and attempt to drive the thing. It'll be pretty clear pretty fast how in or out everything actually is...
    • That's nasty! I think there is perhaps an inherent problem is using elastomers in such environments. The whole thing can and will get quite hot, and elastomers are not famous for their temperature resistance. On top of that, if the components are cast rubber or urethane and so on, there might be QA/QC problems with bubbles or voids in the material that could critically change their performance. They might just tear apart after being squished (presuming that any elastomers are used in compression rather than tension, I'm thinking that you squeeze one with a void in it and it tears the wall of the void to the outer edge of block, then the next time it extends or otherwise twists, it just gives up). This is all purely hypothetical, but it makes me wonder if the things that they have put into it to make it nice to use/live with are perhaps going to cause occasional failures like this. I wouldn't be getting up in arms over it, unless there are many repeats. I have personally ruined an Xtreme clutch - just an HD thing. I can't remember if it was still behind the 20 or was after the 25 went in. But it inverted some of the retaining spring/clip things around the outside. No-one could explain it. It wasn't thrashed, there wasn't heaps of torque being put through it, and there were no obvious problems other than the above. They were quite concerned by the event so they replaced it even though it was a few years old, which was very nice of them. As far as I am concerned, these things happen with clutches.
    • Any damage to the box/input shaft?
    • Hey there Mate , I just got my local guy to install it Waterhouse Performance, Penrith (specialise Nissan/Datsun and other performance cars) , you can do it yourself if you like , AMS has instructions on their website.  Cheers Pac
×
×
  • Create New...