Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yes brand names do make a difference... One of the 3 you've mentioned has had many issues far and above what you'd call "normal".

Have a google - you'll soon work out which. Each have it's pro's and cons. Different gear ratio options and so on.

I'd suggest you do some research here on SAU and again, more google. There is more then enough information on this very forum alone to give you plenty to think about.

I notice Par not having a great name, there has to be people out there that actually have a par set and are happy with it.

I don't think PAR like using PAR gearsets

As above, go OS GIKEN

As for differences between straight cut and helical. Straight cut is stronger, but noisy. Whereas helical is like a standard gearsetcikk286_tolokerekesvalto.jpg

nengun-1757-00-osgiken-close_gear_set.jpg

And in addition to that:

The reason straight cut is stronger VS helical cut is because the two gears aren't trying to twist off each other. The only reason helical cut gears were developed was to reduce noise.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with PAR gearsets. From the reading I did when they were supposedly having problems, it was dog engagement gearboxes that were having the problem and I can tell you now, dog engagement needs to be driven VERY SPECIFICALLY so make sure you are aware of this if you choose this path.

The options are:

Helical synchro

Helical dog

Straight synchro

Straight dog

Obviously the sets with synchromesh are nicer to drive. Dog engagement should be considered race only and if driven too 'nicely' you will f**k them very quickly

P.s. The gearset picture on top is straight dog. You can see the dog selectors which are like large castle sections which lock in together

From memory of dealing with custom Hearst manufacturers, you can also fit wider straight cut gears in a housing than you can helical cut.

This is only relevant if it's a dog box (my understanding).

This is only relevant if it's a dog box (my understanding).

Ahhh that's what I was trying to think of. This was the reason why most big HP straight cut gearsets are dog engagement.

That meant to say gearset too, not "Hearst" lol.

How strange is that, people who try to say that nothing is wrong with par ... Like look at the above comment... I just cannot believe it NOT 1 person can say they have a PAR and its great NOT 1 how can they be a good brand if this is the case?

Yeah I know a lot of people have had dramas but what I heard was the dramas were to do with the way they were being driven which caused premature wear of the dog teeth.

I cannot personally comment on their quality as I have never used a set from PAR but TBH how could they still be in business if they had a shit product. I can tell you for certain that if they are driven gently, they will be wrecked in no time. I spoke with PAR a while back about it when we were looking for solutions to breakages and they told me that was the very reason they were having problems - that and workshops fitting them that didn't know what they were doing.

NYTSKY - did your firends have the PAR sets installed by PAR? or were they fitted by someone else?

So even tho straight cut is stronger, A helical OS Giken would be the choice. That equals WOW.... They must be really bad in that case as a straight cut is roughly 35% stronger then a helical. So if an Os GIKEN helical is stronger then a Straight cut PAR, then basically a helical PAR would be around 70% weaker then a Helical OS Giken. LOL

You cannot really go wrong with OS GIken, though. No bad reports. Holds tonnes of HP.

I'm pretty sure the choice is simple

+1. I own one and it's great. The tall first is a cool thing too, although I'd say you'd really need a stroker to get the most of out this box. The tall gear's can work against you on a 'peaky curve' car.

So even tho straight cut is stronger, A helical OS Giken would be the choice. That equals WOW.... They must be really bad in that case as a straight cut is roughly 35% stronger then a helical. So if an Os GIKEN helical is stronger then a Straight cut PAR, then basically a helical PAR would be around 70% weaker then a Helical OS Giken. LOL

It isn't that straight cut (haha get it ?) you can't really say they are ~30% stronger, there are upsides to helical gearsets other than reduced noise. for example a helical gearface actually has a greater meshing contact area to distribute forces more evenly (we are speaking relatively about the gear sizes themselves obviously) helical gearsets are also more robust when you're considering axial loading.

i have a par gearset, actually, ive had 7 of them.......and to be honest, its still going through small claims after over 12 months. The gearset in question was a syncro set, and as far as im concerned, i will never reccomend them, nor use them, i would not even use the gearset to put out gerrard if he was on fire. It has cost considerable money, time and i have ZERO patience left. I highly reccomend going an OS set or the PPG set.

For more information regarding the issues feel free to PM me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Update: I got the magnet out. I bought 3 different flexible magnetic reach tools, but none of them worked. The magnet on the tip was all less than 2lbs of force, so i had to buy a special cylindrical magnet that had a pull force of 9lbs.  The magnet finally came in the mail yesterday, so i got under the car to get to work. The super strong magnet isn't that long, so i only have about 1 finger pinch lengths to hold it. I was so scared when i was going in the hole, that the 9lb magnet would just fly away inside the oil pan never to be seen again, but i had my butt cheeks clenched and finger gripped on that thing so tight, i managed to get it to suck the other magnet out.  It was a victory for me last night.         
    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
×
×
  • Create New...