Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow never heard of any thin happening like that here most i have seen them touch is the battery to see if its secure and the tyres thats it? but i guess thry could if they wanted to i mean if u get the car passed for emissions then you wouldnt have the worry at all ?

Wow never heard of any thin happening like that here most i have seen them touch is the battery to see if its secure and the tyres thats it? but i guess thry could if they wanted to i mean if u get the car passed for emissions then you wouldnt have the worry at all ?

Nah. Depends where you are to some extent, but even here in SA, where the cops are not so bad and the rules are not so rigid, you simply cannot get an aftermarket ECU legal in a registered car unless it is fully engineered, and basically locked so you can't tune it. That is pretty much the case anywhere. So even if you have a Motec tuned to within an inch of it's life, fully compliant with the latest Euro emissions standards.....it's still not legal (unless locked up as above).

Just don't be a 'brother' and hangout/do skidzzzzz/be a tool/eat kababs in the 'known' hotspots and you should be ok.

They setup in random locations/times of day down here.

My best mate was done literally 1km from Penguin or Watson (can't remember which), at 3pm on a Tues IIRC. So you are definitely copping the same shit we have beem

Mate of mine just got pulled up in his 31 has rb25 high mount screamer pipe frount mount 33 brake converaion and hes grafter an r33 rear cradle into the car with an r200 diff.... got defected for wheels out of guards and dark tint??? didnt even have problems with the turbo caz the pod was covered in a box lol

^^ yeah that was my thinking, chuck the stock airbox back in while your at it, will look more legit....

I mean if you are worried about police checks why have pods or blue hoses everywhere , smoke and mirrors will work wonders 99% of the time and having just seen pics of your bay on stance, I'd say all black hosing and factory airbox would do wonders for your bay, it would be much more photogenic and it would look standard which is what you want if your in Vic...just my personal opinion ;)

or if cops ask questions you could try say its a NUR and this model didnt use AFMs from factory :)

it's not a cop thing why i'm getting delete pipes made. They're Nismo AFM's going for $600 odd and i'm not using them.... seems absolutely pointless to have them sitting there, doing nothing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...