Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I cant do around an outside corner,

I just get a heap of wrinkles.

So half my wing looks good, and the other half is turdworthy.

The wing, front bar, and rear bar have these annoying shapes.

Can anyone do it?

Can you recommend anyone?

Or even better, teach me how.

$ Im not asking for any freebies.$

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406252-anyone-any-good-at-wrapping-vinyl/
Share on other sites

I've done two cars. The first was an R31, really easy because of the squareness. The second was a wide body 180, That was a nightmare. Took so long and half was cheap vinyl. If you're going to do complexed curves, get the good stuff and not metalic or otherwise you will need release cuts (you will only notice these when you're close, I put them on edges).

I bought my vinyl from Sydney, forgot what they were called but the guy had done a whole heap of cars (Domino's, Jack Daniels, etc). He was really enthusiastic and helpful.

They said a bonnet wrapped in cf pattern, 1500x1400, didnt know what brand, not 3m, $600.

Its pretty flat so i can do it easy now ive had practice, for about $25

So its a no brainer man, ill just persist with the difficult bits, and finish it myself.

The wing is done, 3rd time around got it good enough. and the rest are easier shapes to cover.

Im doing the bonnet, front bar, skirts, pods, wing, and the rear bar last, ill see how it looks maybe leave the rear.

The rear bar and skirts are the only bits with good paint so they are just to complete the look.

It should be done by friday, ill bring it out.

If i can do it.

It doesent work so good in the cold, the bonnet got 90% done then it got cold and ripped.

So do it again. Oh well the wing took 3 goes.

I can bring everything inside i guess, if i can keep bubs away from it.

See how it goes.

ill come out anyway with whats done.

Then you can see some mistakes too.

Doesent matter cos its just my s-box.

You should still consider it.

Its difficult, not impossible. And would be easier with more expensive stuff im sure.

The prep is 10% of a paint prep. Which is heaps of time saved.

Getting it done by a pro would still cost much less than a paintjob.

Anyway, just the bonnet to go now, ill leave the rear bar till later, and reassemble.

Ill post pics of the dodgy bits too so you can see what the deal is.

The rest looks realy good.

But I think 'Dammit' didn't realy express your feelings when you stepped back and had a look.

Thanks, no dammit is for the public, haha.

Heres the bits that worked ok (pics).

Is the square in the middle on purpose?

Yes thats a patch where i ripped it and wrinkled it and generally fked it up.

Its a dodgey patch cos im going to have another go anyway.

You can see a couple of small patches on the front bar, thats because of the extreme corner.

Homemade decal covers missing paint.

I think ill do the rear bar too.

post-89755-0-17619700-1344653547_thumb.jpg

post-89755-0-82324800-1344653716_thumb.jpg

post-89755-0-54199000-1344653744_thumb.jpg

post-89755-0-90760900-1344653774_thumb.jpg

post-89755-0-54918600-1344653997_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, all the crude is used for fuels and petrochem feedstocks (pesticides, many other chemicals, etc etc). But increasingly over the last few decades, much of the petrochem synthessis has started with methane because NG has been cheaper than oil, cleaner and easier and more consistent to work with, etc etc etc. So it's really had to say what the fraction either way is. Suffice to say - the direct fuels fraction is not insigificant. Heavy transport uses excruciatingly large amounts. Diesel is wasted in jet heaters in North American garages and workshops, thrown down drill holes in quarries, pissed all over the wall to provide electricity to certain outback communities, etc etc. Obviously road transport, and our pet project, recreational consumption camouflaged as road transport, is a smaller fraction of the total liquid HC consumption again. If you're talking aboust Aussie cars' contribution to the absolute total CO2 production of the country, then of course our share of the cubic mile of coal that is used for power generation, metallurgy, etc adds up to a big chunk. Then there is the consumption of timber. Did you know that the production of silicon metal, for example, is done in Australia by using hardwood? And f**king lots and lots and lots of hardwood at that. Until recently, it was f**king jarrah! There are many such sneaky contributors to CO2 production in industry and farming. NG is used in massive quantities in Australia, for power gen, for running huge water pumps (like, 1-2MW sized caterpillar V16 engines running flat out pumping water) for places like mine sites and minerals/metals refineries. And there are just a huge number of those sort of things going on quietly in the background. So NG use is a big fraction of total CO2 production here. I mean, shit, I personally design burners that are used in furnaces here in Oz that use multiple MW of gas all day every day. The largest such that I've done (not here in Oz) was rated to 150MW. One. Single. Gas burner. In a cement clinker kiln. There are thousands of such things out there in the world. There are double digits of them just here in Oz. (OK< just barely double digits now that a lot of them have shut - and they are all <100MW). But it's all the same to me. People in the car world (like this forum's users) would like to think that you only have to create an industrial capability to replace the fuel that they will be using in 10 years time, and imagine that everyone else will be driving EVs. And while the latter part of that is largely true, the liquid HC fuel industry as a whole is so much more massive than the bit used for cars, that there will be no commercial pressure to produce "renewable" "synthetic" fuels just for cars, when 100x that much would still be being burnt straight from the well. You have to replace it all, or you're not doing what is required. And then you get back to my massive numbers. People don't handle massive numbers at all well. Once you get past about 7 or 8 zeros, it becomes meaningless for most people.
    • @GTSBoy out of the cubic mile of crude oil we burn each year, I wonder how much of that is actually used for providing petrol and diesel.   From memory the figure for cars in Australia, is that they only add up to about 2 to 3% of our CO2 production. Which means something else here is burning a shit tonne of stuff to make CO2, and we're not really straight up burning oil everywhere, so our CO2 production is coming from elsewhere too.   Also we should totally just run thermal energy from deep in the ground. That way we can start to cool the inside of the planet and reverse global warming (PS, this last paragraph is a total piss take)
    • As somebody who works in the energy sector and lives in a subzero climate, i'm convinced EV's will never be the bulk of our transport.  EV battery and vehicle companies over here have been going bankrupt on a weekly basis the last year. 
    • With all the rust on those R32s, how can it even support all the extra weight requirements. Probably end up handling as well as a 1990s Ford Falcon Taxi.
    • Yes...but look at the numbers. There is a tiny tiny fraction of the number of Joules available, compared to what is used/needed. Just because things are "possible" doesn't make them meaningful.
×
×
  • Create New...