Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The most frustrating thing I find with MAP sensor ecu's is the lack of capability to accurately tune for altering altitudes or atmospheric pressures. I initially used an atmospheric compensated GM 3 bar sensor, and it would over compensate and run lean at higher altitudes. I've now switched to the Apxei 3.5 bar sensor and it goes the other way.

The Apexi sensor is a far better quality item for accuracy and reaction speed. I've picked up massively noticable throttle response and eliminated a flat spot that would occur during the transition onto boost. This is balanced out by the need to have a completely different map made up when I drive up a hill. The PIM value is changing near on 400-450, which is nearly 1/2 a load band cell group in the vacuum range.

This means a cruise AFR of 14.7 turns into a fat 13.x. Add to this that the air temp sensor is adding more fuel due to the air temps on the tablelands being at least 10 degrees cooler than the coast. This charactoristic is more noticable off boost than on, but I can't really say for sure as I've only driven the range once with the new sensor in the car and it was pretty much all at a slow pace. The on boost load bands change at a PIM rate of 2000 per band.

MAF sensor tunes are SO much easier to get correct, and they compensate way better at altitude as it is measuring air density/temp/volume all at once and all the time. Less drift in tune. Map on the other hand, just compensating with air air temp sensor to predict altered air density just isn't enough. The only correct way to do it would be to use a propper atmospheric pressure compensation sensor, and use the sensor data to alter the MAP sensor value by a % over RPM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean yes, if you're starting from scratch on an unknown engine yes you don't need to be doing all kinds of math in the background but if you're doing relatively minor changes like AFM + injectors + boost up with some aftermarket turbos it takes quite a bit of math if you want to do something like maintain OEM fuel + timing tables but compressed and then a bit more load scale up top. I think I've spent too much time working on big engineering nightmares though so I'm a big fan of trying to constrain the scope of whatever work I'm doing as much as possible and trying to get it right before moving on. For example, a local owner just did the usual E85 + single turbo conversion to his R32 GTR and nearly burned his car to the ground doing some spirited driving up the local mountains. Turbine is unshielded and too close to the hood insulation. It's tough to balance "just get the project done" and "seemingly small details can cause massive setbacks I'm not willing to deal with".
    • No idea about Neil's steering wheel, but I have the same behaviour in the Stagea. I doubt it has ever been messed with so might be normal. Indicating to turn right at a roundabout and correcting even a little bit to the left to go around will cancel the indicator. Never considered it an issue other than it being a bit odd.
    • Does anyone know if this is off centered? Looks like it, when I indicate to go right, but turn my steering wheel slightly left it cancels (was always like that even before I started messing around with it) was wondering if anyone else has the same issue?
    • Nothing photo worthy since last update, lots of little plumbing bits for the AAC/Cold start valves, and unfortunately I still need another couple of parts for the brake booster line and the AAC into the plenum. Otherwise it all looks good to start up engine wise, onto checking the electrics/interior
    • Good news mate, plenty of spares available 5:40  
×
×
  • Create New...