Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Is someone able to give me the correct part numbers for all three drive belts for my S2 Stagea (aircon, alternator, power steering)

Recently as part of my 100,000k service I bought a set of drive belts. The local gates dealer supplied me with

4PK835R

4K865R

4PK925R

(I ordered gates racing belts)

When my mechanic did the service he said they didn't fit and the belts on it are at the end of the adjustment. The belts on it currently he said are

4PK865

4PK890

4PK910

I had a quick look on just jap and the numbers they list are

3PK840

4PK855

4PK915

Which are the correct numbers? Please help, no searching is coming up with anything lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/406663-rb25det-neo-belts/
Share on other sites

The 4 stands for 4 ridges/ribs. The last numbers stand for the circumference.

If the mechanic said to get 10mm shorter

4PK865 = 4PK855

4PK890 = 4PK880

4PK910 = 4PK900

Mine were replaced a while ago. I just checked them and they are the same as what the mechanic told you you have on your car.

I just noticed something too ( see attached pic) - On the Alternator/Waterpump Belt (890) I am only using up less than 10mm of the adjustment and have a shitload to go. A 4PK880 would be a bitch to put on.I would say your mech. wants 10mm shorter because the current ones are stretched. That's just what happens over time.

post-58831-0-36424300-1344513028_thumb.jpg

Basically, Do what KiwiRS4T said :)

Yeah that's why the mechanic said its near the end of the adjustment. The belt shop gave me a 4PK925R to fit where a 4PK910 should go so he couldnt adjust it enought to fit.

It does seem that the belts currently on the car are the ones I need and are the standard stagea length because they're the same as what's on other peoples stagea's

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...