Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

R33 series 1 gts/t = ugly

R33 GTR + series 2 gts/t = sexy shizz

R34 = fkin sexy

I personally think the r33's reputation of its looks was horrible because of the series 1 gts/t's, Other than that all the other r33s look fine to me. Matter of taste and opinion. In the end, you own a freakin skyline and thats pretty decent no matter what model it is. if anything im sick of those kents in their commys and falcons thinking their rides are all that, when infact its just an over powered tractor. I mean seriously we should be discussing why people think their commodores are so great, i mean who doesnt own one of them =='

32333435.jpg

looking at that i would have to say the 33 is the smoothest, sleekest, SLIMEST car of the lot....

It also looks the lowest and is the nicest colour...

In fact i have just gained a whole new love for the 33 shape..

I always though it was a bit baulbous looking as well but beside its brothers its gotta be the sexiest of the bunch...

ok firstly...stageas? really ? those massive station-wagons? people actually thing they are good looking? i just assumed that whoever was driving it wanted a skyline but had kids...hence the shitty station-wagon version of the skyline. imo Bar the front(which is a skyline front anyway)...those things are ridiculously hideous......

secondly...duckwings are the shit....but the stock s2 spoiler has really grown on me and suits the car now that its been lowered...so im keeeping it.

Lastly , yes an s1 maroon skyline with that rounded spoiler looks almost as bad as a stagea.

For someone who is only very new to this forum, i'll just give you a heads up..

Stageas have a pretty huge following on here, so maybe not so much hate, save you getting off on the wrong foot..

You already started a thread about R33's being ugly, now stageas...

For someone who is only very new to this forum, i'll just give you a heads up..

Stageas have a pretty huge following on here, so maybe not so much hate, save you getting off on the wrong foot..

You already started a thread about R33's being ugly, now stageas...

thanks for the heads up , but IMO(yeah O stands for opinion) stageas are butt ugly and I stand by it. Like another member on here said ..the only reason he got one is because he wanted to the haul the kids around and in spite of its looks a stagea is till better then any other station wagon out there. If I had kids..id buy a Stagea too.

You obviously dont get the point oif the thread...notice the inverted commas before and after the word "ugly"? I personally LOVE the r33 shape..as I have stated before...and cant seem to understand why the general car community consider it the worst looking of the Skylines...hence the start of this thread

Kids these days got no respect..

I'm sure his mum is fat and ugly too, but if someone didn't drive her he wouldn't be here ..

Id imagine someone with over 8000 posts would have some kind of civility as you've been on this forums for sometime....instead you choose to insult my mother....this has made you feel better/prove your point somehow? I'm not sure I quite understand this keyboard heroism, but you have succeeded in coming of as a massive douchebag- congratulations!

Edited by tripsteady
  • Like 1

Nissan owners make the R33 ugly.

Especially now as they head into "old age" and the paint wears through and they cop dings etc... They need to be treated with TLC but a lot of the ones I see don't get that.

Have a look in your rear view mirror next time you have a 32 behind you and let me know if you can tell wether its an early 90's laser or a 32. I cant.

I have a supra...most R32s are so far behind I cant see them anymore...... :ph34r:

stageas are butt ugly and I stand by it

Everyone can have an opinion mate, did I overtake you at the track recently? Drag you off at the lights? Or are you just jelly?

Stagea's ftw. At least I don't get pulled up every second day, actually I never have in this. Plus it is a lot cheaper than a 34gtr and most of the running gear is the same.

Have you even seen the newer M35 stagea up close? Probably not...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...