Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yeah, why dont we hate on S13's instead? God those things are gettho.

not always. nigel petrie's 2 tone is awesome.

lol yeah with there silly ca18/sr20's and there filthy cable ties

cable ties are ghetto!

although SR's sound like tractors, they're pretty amazing 2ltr engines for their age.

Why so much hate on other Nissans? 33's are great, s13's are great. C34's, r34's r32,s are great. So much hate on S1 burgundy too. My parts car was a burgundy S1 Type M on Enkeis and I reckon It would've been awesome before it was run into.

TL;DR, Can't we all just get along.

Why so much hate on other Nissans? 33's are great, s13's are great. C34's, r34's r32,s are great. So much hate on S1 burgundy too. My parts car was a burgundy S1 Type M on Enkeis and I reckon It would've been awesome before it was run into.

TL;DR, Can't we all just get along.

where would the fun in that be?

The driver lol

Serously the little wing or no wing makes them look horrible , a gtr wing makes them sooo much nicer , no wing they look boring like a camry

stock wheels is a no no that makes the car look lame add that to a faded silver paint and frosted headlights and its not very nice looking , actually just about every car can have a combination of items that makes them look poor , the 33 can look great at least if doesnt have the horrible dash cluster on r32 lol that is a fail on every car that had that style

even the R34 and 35 has to grow on you ?

Being a 33 owner I might be seen as being biased, but I've owned two and they are my favorite line.

But I can see how to many people they seem 'bland'. The series one is ugly as all get out, but I truely do like the series 2.

Of course it does need to be slammed down a few mm's, and some wider rims. But with good stance and offset it can look the goods. The main thing that annoys me is that only the GTR's have widened rear fenders.

  • 1 year later...

I read this and decided I'd take the whale out again and see if I could shoot some bad photos of her....... and failed. :wave: They're gorgeous to me. But the GTS series I wing wasn't.............. great..

I still don't get why so many people seem to think they are ugly, or is just that those who do just seem to be those who would like to tell the world about their preferences in life. dunno.

Still going through my shots.............. nup, can't find any. hahaha

They're not ugly, they're just 'soft' compared to the R32 and R34.

I'd happily swap my R32 for an R33 (GT-R of course).

The story of the 90's Skyline goes (which I made up):

R32 Skyline = Top athlete, smashing competition around the world. Got banned from competing (Group A racing).

R33 Skyline = After the ban, depressed Skyline stopped doing cardio and started eating more junk food, became fatter but still had the muscles underneath.
R34 Skyline = Went through some soul searching, decided to train up to get back to the glory days, became toned up and muscle-y.

R35 = Roids, not a Skyline any more.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Man, different parts but the same numbers is terrible @dbm7! And it doesn't help that most online shops don't list the part numbers at all. They just give a list of compatible models...
    • Slow when hot could also be because its getting more dynamic compression, OR things are getting a bit tighter once it is all expanded. If it were an earthing issue, typically I'd expect you to have it have issues all the time. Unless it's really a combination of both things. Where the higher compression, and things being a bit tighter, is giving that bit of extra load and you do need a slight clean up on the cables/connections.
    • Yeah, this is one of the most annoying things about nissan part numbers... I've got an unrelated example... Image is of the AT output shaft ~ they have the same part#, but clearly the shaft on the left is beefier design to that on the right ...the difference (essentially) is the 'lighter' shaft on the right, is for engines up to RB25DE (this includes RB20 variants) : the shaft on the left is for RB25/26DET(T)....are they interchangeable? Yes...but obviously one shaft is going to be stronger than the other...and, the lighter shaft is around USD115, but the heavier shaft closer to USD150...same part#... ...epc-data usually tells a tale ~ the amayama listing for 39100-23U60 has a note "Longest side is between 60 and 105 cm" ; no such info is there for 39100-23U70 ...and given the great disparity in price between the 2 parts, it makes me at least curious (to the point of caution) where the 'extra money' went? ...ie; these 2 parts have a cost difference that (to myself at least) isn't explained by 'plastic boot'...ie; with amayama there's AUD700 price difference ...plastic versus rubber?...I'm not seeing it like that...and 60cm ~ 105cm...??...that's a huge disparity....something hinky going on here... I'd try searching by VIN, not model... /2cents
    • I don't know for sure, but I'd expect them all to be interchangeable given the diff end and hub end don't move/change between any C34 series. Often Nissan will change part numbers and the aftermarket follows those year ranges; but the original part number change doesn't mean other parts won't fit. The change could be a change in material, internal parts or even just supplier. For example, all the RB gearbox to engine bolts are no longer available and there is a new part number instead. The only change is they went from cadmium plated bolts to zinc plated due to the issues manufacturing with Cadmium. They look different but work the same.
×
×
  • Create New...