Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

all you should do is use the q45 tb and put the rb25 tps on it

It's not that simple. Here a pic so you can see the difference. http://rb25det.org/rb/tps.jpg

left SII, right Q45 (unknown year, pre 1995)

the USDM 1996 Q45 TPS looks like it wil plug into SII harness but I don't know if it will bolt to the greddy IM.

hmm they look kinda the same design but the turning mechanism seem to have different joins or something.

have u got a 1996 q45 tps?

my guess would to be either go this way or u will have to have the tps custom fitted

Nope don't have a 96 tps, however I do have a 96 Q45 FSM. The TPS it shows is similar to the SII TPS, they may have the same P/N.

But getting back to the issue, why does my TPS read ~5V at idle with the SII tps or the Q45 TPS? When at WOT the voltage drops to ~.5V.

Seems it's reversed.

Some guesses......(based on R32)

*you are measuring the voltage between the wrong two terminals. The supply voltage to ground measurement should be 5V. The signal to ground measurement should vary ~0.5V-4V.

*If not the above then are you sure the TPS's are wired in the same way. Because it is a potentiometer if you swap the + & - wiring it will read in reverse.

*Are you sure the TB's actually open with the same rotation eg RB30 and RB20 TB's open in different ways - one opens clockwise and the other opens anticlockwise. The TPS's are therefore designed to rotate in opposite ways and so mixing and matching can mean the output can get reversed.

As a check, get a multimeter and measure the TPS resistance (signal to gound) at idle position and at WOT position (both with the plug disconnected). What readings do you get for both TPS's?

Have you got the connectors on the right way round?

There are 2 TPSs - a Trotlle Position SWITCH, which normally tells the ECU that the throttle is closed or WOT, and a Throttle Position SENSOR, which tells the ECU where how far the throttle is open.

I'm the other guy having the same problem. Both Q45 and RB25 TPSs show ~5V at idle and ~.5 at WOT. I'm pretty sure I have it connected to the right sensor, not the switch. I measured the resistances of both. They both showed ~0.8 kOhms at idle and ~4 kOhms at WOT. When I measure the harness side of the plug (unplugged), I get 5V on one wire, ~4V on the middle wire, and 0V on the last. Is that right, can someone be so kind as to measure theirs for comparison?

Also, can anyone tell me how to check the codes on my ecu? I have an SII RB25, but it has no LED or adjustment screw on the ecu case?

On the R32's there is a diagnostic connector. This is a small brown plug located at the fuse box.

To enter the diagnostic mode you need to short two of the terminals for two seconds. This then puts the computer into check mode and it flashes the results on the ECU led and the engine check light (these are on the same circuit).

I don't know if R33 is different.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...