Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I have a TRUST/GREDDY INTERCOOLER single entry for sale

It owes me $2100 but need the cash will sell for $1700.

Dimensions 600x300x115. Comes with pipe work for the plenum side for a gtr.

Very Good condition NO FIN DAMAGE...just may need a clean lol

Urgent sale Must GO!!!

PM OR POST HERE

CHEERS

tony

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/40723-greddy-intercooler-kit/
Share on other sites

Hey it does require the front bar to be cut but not to much just so it clears the front and tanks...No big drama...

Let me know cheers

hmm i might have to disagree with you dough boy on this one....i think the mounts may be diffrent and you would need to drill and tap for the air temp sensor...although i could be wrong on that!BUMP its cheap

hmm i might have to disagree with you dough boy on this one....i think the mounts may be diffrent and you would need to drill and tap for the air temp sensor...although i could be wrong on that!BUMP its cheap

I've got an R34 GT-R intercooler here, and the same model that Tony's selling. Both fit on the same car using the same mounts, the Greddy one uses the center bolt where the hood latch is rather than the two side "prongs" on the tops of either side. There's a (covered) hole on the outlet for the temp sensor too... although there's no clear shot of the back side of the cooler here, it might not have the temp mount!

I have put a intercooler of this size on a mates car and no drilling etc is required...Only thing needed was to trim the front bar a little

A TINY bit of cutting of the front bar was required to fit this intercooler onto my R33 GTR, seriously it was more of a tidying up and shaping more-so than cutting for clearance. The amount of plastice removed from the front bar was absolutely minimal.

It also clears the factory BOV return pipe, so you can keep you stock GTR BOVs which I was very worried about :D:(

Straight bolt-in, and from memory the installation instruction manual came with pictured instructions for fitting to R32, R33 and R34 so it should fit all models (albeit using different mounts maybe)

Mine also had a temperature sensor hole on the exit end tank, which I covered up with the supplied blanking plate and gasket.

Awesome bit of kit, absolultely everything needed was included except for hose clamps, which I recommend you use uprated hose clamps from Triton or similar company.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...