Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

G'day Guys,

I thought I would post in this section regarding an issue I am having with my 32 Skyline (1993, Manual, Exhaust, Intercooler, Pod - 170,000kms)

I haven't driven the car in roughly 3 months since I am afraid I will break down on the way to or home from work (There is no areas to pull off the road due to so much construction).

The issue started on a Thursday where I was in very heavy stop & go peak hour traffic I got 1/2 way home then while sitting at some lights and about to start going again the revs were fine to about 1,500rpm then it just cut out and stalled. I started it back up and would just keep cutting out till finally feathering the pedal and riding the clutch pulled off to the side of the road and around the corner the car stalled, I sat there for 30 seconds and started the car up again and it was idling normally. Luckily I got the car home I had one more little hiccup but while going about 100km/h down the high way.

I took the car the following day to the mechanics and they checked it over and found the fuel filter was a bit grubby and one of the fuel lines was unhooked from its rail and sitting higher up which was thought to be the problem.

I then started driving the car to work again Monday, Wednesday then Thursday. Yet again on Thursday the traffic was stop go and the exact same thing happened it cut out while taking off from a set of traffic lights to describe it feels like a learner bunny hopping because of not enough accelerator (It would feel like it was going to go then all power is lost then feel like it is going to go and then cut out or keep hopping along). Again I was able to mange pulling the car off the road left it off for about 5 minutes then started it up idled fine and left it idling for about 10 minutes. I was able to get home again.

So both times the exact same scenario the car doesn't seem to like stop start traffic.

A couple of things that come to mind is you can hear the fuel pump sometimes it gets rather loud when stopping and going you hear it buzzing away then it gets a little louder like it went into a overdrive and pumping faster (Sounds like its pumping then it is just picking up air and spins really fast) - This is what I first thought was the problem.

But now I am also being told is it most probably is the AFM, I haven't touched the car in months it is just in the garage with a flat battery (Going to charge it) - Picking up a new AFM on Saturday from the looks the original AFM is still on the car.

No traffic / Light traffic / Highway use its fine - Long periods of stop start it gets upset.

Anyone's advice would be greatly appreciated since I am a little stressed from possibly replacing the AFM and it happens a few days down the track but also it could fix the problem.

Cheers,

Chris

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/407641-r32-gtst-strange-issue/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...