Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

here we go :)

  • E85
  • Hypergear SS2 0.82 Housing
  • 45mm Turbosmart Hypergate External Gate off Turbo Housing
  • Stock Manifold
  • 1.6bar boost errrr day :)
  • Made 343kW on Virtual Dyno (will hire a dyno one day when I have time and finalise the tune)

post-22311-0-05461600-1418036566_thumb.png

here we go :)

  • E85
  • Hypergear SS2 0.82 Housing
  • 45mm Turbosmart Hypergate External Gate off Turbo Housing
  • Stock Manifold
  • 1.6bar boost errrr day :)
  • Made 343kW on Virtual Dyno (will hire a dyno one day when I have time and finalise the tune)

attachicon.gifE85 - 260kPa.png

Hey i notice that you ramp your timing quite nicely... i found with the 0.82 rear i've been able to add more timing earlier to get up on power earlier.... i'll post a pic of my latest timing table on 98. i'm loving this thread i'm thinking of running e85, i'm all setup for it. I have a datalogit and powerfc as well.

as for the latency corrections i've found that the corrections if wrong a heard at idle, they are not precise from the injector manufacturer and its best to have a little play with the latency correction at idle and listen for it to be 'happy/smooth'.

^ you should be able to run a bucket load more timing, also being a RB25DET the timing map has a hump before it decays timing in the vacuum area. This is evident in the factory Nistune, Haltech & PowerFC maps.

Other ECU manufacturers just put anything in there to make it run.. I based my map off the Haltech factory map to get the correct timing curve in the vacuum area and made my own tweaks to improve the torque & driveability.

Here's a factory Haltech Map for Unleaded Fuel (for E85 you could easily just add 5 degrees over the top and it would still be safe):

post-22311-0-54419800-1418081937_thumb.jpg

well...she runs on e85 now

can't wait to get ot back on the road and start tuning

did you just blanket timing across the map? I started off with a decent 98 map then just went Ctrl + A and Page UP x5 LOL.. of course that was just to get started

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...