Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, as far as I can work out, it's a 50-55l tank.

If taking it easy, get about 350 city driving.

On the freeway, I've heard approx 5-550 a tank.

It's certainly thirstier than I thought it would be.

Luckily I live close to work.

  • Like 1

Hmmm not bad, a tune does wonders in regards to fuel economy.

My evo 7 is a 45l tank, fuel light usually comes on with 15litres left in the tank, so roughly get about 270 kilometers under city driving with 15 liters to spare.
I usually drive an additional 10 litres worth on fuel light resulting in around 350 ks with 4-5 liters left city driving, i reckon if i dont get on boost, i can push it close to 400ks per tank, which is decent for a early 2000 evo :P

That being said, my fuel effciency increased after a service, turbo back exhaust and tune, before i was getting 280ks every 40 liters ==' If i drive with a heavy foot, probably 280 ks max (if that) from the full 45 liters.
Evo's run very rich up top from factory.

Edited by Deza3000
  • 3 months later...

Hi everyone! Was wondering if you would be able to help me out. My friend got his 2001 3 CT9A EVO 7 stolen around April this year from Cambridge Street, Penshurst SYDNEY. The police have been absolutely no help and I was wondering hoping you could spread the word to see if anyone may have seen or knows anything!

Thank you so much!!!!!

These are the details:

Make: EVO 7
Model: GH-CT9A SNGFZ
Colour: White
Rego when stolen: JDM3VO
VIN: TBA
Chassis No: CT9A -0004702
Distinctive features: whole rear of the car is an EVO 9 body.
Any info: [email protected]

1779255_10152378223856954_17045818841732

10403304_10152378223891954_7052076604887

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If that's the wiring from the factory, I'd be inspecting the loom everywhere.   Any signs of that anywhere else, and seriously, I'd get rid of the car ASAP before the electrical gremlins make it worthless, or it goes up in flames on its own. That is scary how that insulation is failing!
    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
×
×
  • Create New...