Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

and they're actually fairly reliable tbh... no problems at all.

Probably true. Just the horror stories I heard from Clio Sport owners when I was considering buying one a few years ago turned me off the Renault Sport gear. Hella fun to drive but wouldn't want to have to pay for owning one.

meh, is rather look good going slow, than look ugly going fast
Ha it'll take more than a car to help you, bud! (No, I don't know you - you just left yourself wide open with that one)

Yeh I suppose they might go a few weeks without breaking down. One owner I spoke to gave his service rep a spare key, so each time it broke down he just called the service rep to come and get it.

we had a regular clio 1.6A without breaking down since 2007, it finally broke because my sister went into a pole. so, they're not that bad.

a 2002 laguna that was sold in 2008 also worked very very well, no breakdowns at all..

the laguna before though. LOL. gearbox issues gearbox issues gearbox issues.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Does that price include the rack time to straighten the frame and body and replacement of parts and paint, as well as the noise and emmisions testing  The last engineering certificate I had done, albeit about 15 years ago, was around $1000 for a few inspections and the certificate 
    • 😂 thanks guys. The diagram i had did not have the breather on it at all. Much appreciated.  
    • Geez, engineers fees have definitely gone up. Mine back 2007 cost me all of $300. Mind you, I had to go back to him a few times to get him to write the correct things on the report after he'd inspected it. Things like wrong exhaust size, wrong wheel sizes, etc etc.
    • Can we see a scan of the original quote? The problem with engineers (and by this, I mean, all engineers across all engineering industries) is that there are "engineers" and there are "engineers" (you'll have to imagine the two different vocal emphases on those two versions of the same word. Engineering is a mindset - your farm kid who spent his life rebuilding the tractor will likely make a good engineer. The farm kid who spent his life taking photos of butterflies.. perhaps not. But on top of that mindset, the modern engineer has to learn how to write so that there is absolutely no way of being misunderstood. Proposals/budget estimates/quotations are one place where this is absolutely vital. You have to delineate your scope of supply with extremely hard boundaries, and anywhere where there is any possibility of not being able to have such a hard boundary, you need to write language that will cover you from scope creep, cost overruns, the inevitable interference of the client or their "engineer", etc etc. Now, if your clients are the BHPs and the Rio Tintos of the world, and similar, then you get good at this. If you are an automotive engineer, pitching work to the great unwashed masses, your skills in this area might not be well developed, because you're only dealing with knuckle draggers trying to get a big block legal in a Torana. And when I say "might not"....I'd suggest there's a better than even chance that any such skills might be completely absent. So, we might be able to look at your quote and see what the opportunities are for rebuttal.
×
×
  • Create New...