Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys just a quick question im sure someone will know straight up.

did a search on when to upgrade FPR, the anwser was 'Never if you have the right injectors'

What I want to know, do I have the right size for my application?

Mods are as follow.

Standard RB25

Hypergear ATR43 turbo

top mount manifold, ext wastegate

front facing plenum

top feed fuel rail

Denso 850cc injectors

Wolf 3D V4 is the brain.

will i need an adjustble FPR? or will just running the lines from my standard reg/filter do the trick?

Power goal is around 270kw

Thanks :)

Not if youre running an aftermarket fuel rail it wont be. Mainly due to the fact that the stock reg is fitted to the factory rail and it wont simply 'bolt on'.

In which case you would require an aftermarket reg.

GTR injectors (444cc) support 280kw close to max duty cycle of 100%. 850cc you have plenty of headroom, you could easily run E85 at that power level and still have headroom. Adjustable FPR will be a waste of money.

Not if youre running an aftermarket fuel rail it wont be. Mainly due to the fact that the stock reg is fitted to the factory rail and it wont simply 'bolt on'.

In which case you would require an aftermarket reg.

Ah, didn't even see that one :/

stao runs 850's with ethanol and getting upto and over 300kw's , correct me if im wrong..

if you have a stock rail with the 850's then no need for aftermarket reg, i went after market cause of the top feed rail.

Edited by SliverS2

Hey guys just a quick question im sure someone will know straight up.

did a search on when to upgrade FPR, the anwser was 'Never if you have the right injectors'

What I want to know, do I have the right size for my application?

Mods are as follow.

Standard RB25

Hypergear ATR43 turbo

top mount manifold, ext wastegate

front facing plenum

top feed fuel rail

Denso 850cc injectors

Wolf 3D V4 is the brain.

will i need an adjustble FPR? or will just running the lines from my standard reg/filter do the trick?

Power goal is around 270kw

Thanks :)

I think the comment "never if you have the right injectors" is misguided somewhat regarding regulator.

a few reasons you may install an adjustable fpr would be:

1. when you increase boost, need to ensure f/pressure is not going to exceed HP f/pumps supply (pressure vs volume)

2. if you change camshaft, often less vaccum causes from larger cam profiles cause high f/pressure

3. as forementioned, if the aftermarket rail doesn't have a fitting for stock FPR. (should be a no brainer for the tuner)

4. if large injectors are used and have poor low pulse width control.

5. if trying to improve fuel economy. (often best to run higher pressure where possible)

6. different fuels being used, eg, methanol/e85/m85/e10 etc. high fuel pressure with higher content of alcohol.

if you want to run e85, other fuel system consideratinos must be made first, fuel tank, fuel lines, fuel pump, compatible fuel regulator etc.

but thats another day.

The 850cc's are fine for a little while longer,

this time depends on the duty cycle at the highest rpm the engine is designed to reach and

of course if the fuel pump can supply the volume at that higher pressure (base pres + boost pres).

Looks like ill be purchasing an aftermarket one as i will need speedflow type fittings for the ends of the fuel rail.

Seems like obviously to set up would be.

fuel filter hose to fuel reg, fuel reg to fuel rail & other end of fuel rail to the damper which is on the side of the engine bay?

Yep. Like I said you cant connect a standard reg to an aftermarket reg. Plenty seemed to miss that.

Youll need to connect the fuel filter hose to the rail, then from the rail to the 'in' port of the reg, then the 'out' port of the reg goes back to tank. A reg works by restricting the return from the rail.

Yep. Like I said you cant connect a standard reg to an aftermarket reg. Plenty seemed to miss that. Youll need to connect the fuel filter hose to the rail, then from the rail to the 'in' port of the reg, then the 'out' port of the reg goes back to tank. A reg works by restricting the return from the rail.

READ the above and understand it. Because he is right.

On the other hand, many cars these days do run a dead head fuel rail. The reg is actually located at the back of the car and returns fuel direct to the tank. The fuel that goes forward is all destined to go to the rail and then into the engine - no return. There are concerns with fuel heating and so on (which is why flow through rail return systems were invented in the first place). The concerns are that if you have fuel sitting in the rail while car idles hot at the lights on a hot day (for example) then you might boil the fuel in the rail and cause havoc for yourself. This probably won't happen whilst running because the 3 bar pressure will tend to help stop it from boiling. But it can certainly boil in the rail after parking the car in the same hot hot conditions. This could stop you from being able to start it. A flow through rail will at least be able to purge the vapour out as soon as the fuel pump is switched on, and so you can start them. The advent of dead head systems means that the concerns over boiling were either unfounded or they have found ways around it.

What this means is that you could actually run the supply hose up to a T piece on the inlet of the reg and run the other leg of the T to the fuel rail. Priming the rail from empty might be a bit of a pain in the arse, but the reg would otherwise work as advertised. It would close down to restrict flow to the return to maintain pressure in the rail, and open up to let it go when demand at the engine was low. There might be usability problems with it, but it will still work.

I reckon std replacement or a std replacement one for something that uses rubber fuel hose both sides . I cant see the point throwing money at pretty aluminium screw fittings for a road car . Its not like its being ripped apart in the pits all the time .

Someone does aftermarket adjustable FPRs for Nissans and I think the SR ? one uses hose barbs both sides . Brass barb from you rail to something like this would be cheaper more stealthy and work just as well .

IMO bigger injectors with a bit more pump running std fuel pressure .

A .

  • 11 months later...

I now think there's a bit more to fuel pressure regs than meets the eye . Obviously the OE one is designed to suit a factory std car as in std turbo/boost/cams/injectors/fuel pump inc the high low voltage system .

From what I read in here you ending up tossing most things on say an RB25det because externals like the AFM/injectors/pump etc aren't good for much extra power - fuel flow air flow etc .

So you reaches for the bigger fuel pump and do the direct battery rewire , add larger injectors a Z32 + PFC and tune . If you don't have a wide band and gauge etc you never really know what's going on AFR wise and you take the tuners word that everything's apples .

Then you throw a wide band in and you find things the tuner couldn't get around like say that learning business with PFCs and maybe injectors that aren't as modern as current good ones . Things like mixture control at light loads and cruise aren't brilliant and you can't seem to piss off that rich spike you get when backing off from part throttle . Fuel consumption can be pretty average around town too . Recently I was into the ViPec again and tried a different approach to the cam switching and pump low/high maps (neither based purely on revs BTW) and found better cleaner running . The real surprise was finding how much easier the low/cruise mixtures were to get right by having the pump at low voltage meaning less pressure/flow for the injectors to try and work with .

Just so you know I'm running a 33GTR pump 740s and 256 Tomeis , fuel pressure reg is std . Scotty asked me recently if I was "over running" the std reg and at the time I said I didn't think so but now I think differently . Obviously those Nismo 740s aren't up with EV14s and when you're idling at about 1 ms IDC they need all the help they can get . Maybe it's better accuracy that makes EV14s a tuners best friend because they don't have to screw around with all kinds of things to make older injectors play nice .

The point of all this , IMO anyway , is that once you fit higher capacity fuel pumps and direct wire them the std FPR probably won't cope too well if and may struggle to regulate fuel pressure properly at short injector pulse widths . I think Scotty said somewhere that the std reg has a quite small bypass passage so with a big pump running at full voltage it can't open up enough to prevent the pressure rising under those conditions . It probably won't be an issue with the revs up a bit and a some engine load and that's all some people care about . So , with big pump full voltage the only simple way to make the fuel system run in regulation (base pressure + manifold pressure) is to use an aftermarket fuel pressure reg that can bypass more fuel than a std one can .

If you can find a way to keep the high low voltage system that will help but getting the std wiring to cope with current draws like that E85 Walbro can drag at times won't work .

A .

Oh and BTW EFI Hardware is doing this nifty gadget to adapt a std FPR to aftermarket billet fuel rails . Handy .

http://www.efihardware.com/image/2358/regulator-and-adapter-alloy-fuel-rail-end-8-o-ring-port-to-Nissan-regulator_2358

Edited by discopotato03
  • 5 years later...

Hey all, know this is an old thread but didn't want to start a new one unnecessarily. I've got an rb25det neo that runs richer than a Bavarian chocolate cake after a 4 course, specs are:

Stock turbo

Uprated intercooler

Uprated fuel pump

Stock rail and intake

3" turbo back exhaust

Just wondering if the rich condition could be because of an undersized return line. Cheers in advance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, if I need to fit people in a car I'll just use the Mrs car, the MX5 is perfect for what I need as a fun little sports car for fun on the street As for getting in and out of the MX5, I have no issues as I am a short arse who does lots of mobility training 🥷 If anything, I have been looking at Daihatsu Hi-Jets for a work hack, I helped one of my mates move some stuff with one recently that he picked up from Just Jap, it was a little ripper and plenty big enough for what we needed, it would also be super handy for me as I do alot of gardening, and plan on having some veggie patches and native gardens in the place I buy next year when I retire I did alot landscape gardening and growing veggies prior to my current job, and loved it, and that is a hobby that can keep me sane in my retirement, and as such, the little 300kg load capacity would be more than enough for what I need it to move around I have been looking at utes for just this purpose for a while now, and a near new 2024 Hi-Jet can be had for under $30k And I would rather look at a quirky little Hi-Jet than pretty much any other little ute, well, apart from a Brumby, I love the little Brumby, and weirdly have never owned one yet I was going to buy a heap of raffle tickets to try and win the Brumby that MCM built for Subaru Australia, but sadly I totally missed the raffle, I even filled in some form to be told when the raffle started so I could buy tickets, but to my dismay I was never contacted and found out I missed it when I was randomly googling Brumbys last year... #conspiracy  Maybe I should just buy a Brumby for a little "work hack".....LOL I use to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure
    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
×
×
  • Create New...