Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Get out the sound meter :D

Your probably right about the acceptable level of noise from a whats legal perspective, but I drive it around with it shut, and only open it for track or big street runs.

They do flow, you were probably asking too much of a dual muffler 3.5" system really as you can never have such quiet and not have minor restriction at that size, for your power/flow levels. E85 just needs a bit more of everything - and certainly costly.

The first muffler on my setup was diagonal orientated with a perforated core, so when the air comes in it then hits next bend with the perforations in the side wall creating unwanted turbulence and vortices I suspect. In regards to a straight through muffler it needs to be dead straight, and not with bends inside. It's ok to a degree with straight smooth pipe, but with the muffler holes, definitely straight. This is pretty much what I believe to be creating my issue, especially with the E85 and more HP. 2 LBS of boost more from this relief of back pressure in my exhaust just goes to show how much it was having an effect. I would have liked to go with a big 4" too Ash, but for what I want out of it, I didn't really want to spend that much more. I would have had to do front pipes too, which isn't cheap at that size.

Yeah my tri-pass radiator was sensational, 5 laps and tip top water temps but then I wasn't using E85 or as much boost, tyres would be off before the cooling system had an argument.

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

-9s were all over by around 7500rpm with the same motor config

Is there much difference with the -9's and gt-ss? On my old car with stock cams and heads, my car kept making more power past 7,500 rpm with gt-ss turbos.

http://i49.tinypic.com/2cgbyv5.jpg

Edited by topher_

Whats opinions on HKS split dumps? Is it worth the hassle to change to a set of Midori ones. Also thinking about changing the mines front pipe to something a little bigger as well..

I'm aiming to get into the high 300kw area.

Whats opinions on HKS split dumps? Is it worth the hassle to change to a set of Midori ones. Also thinking about changing the mines front pipe to something a little bigger as well..

I'm aiming to get into the high 300kw area.

Have made over 400 with them...but it ain't the most efficient way of doing it.

Well that's good enough for me. There obviously not the best out there but will do the job. Think I'll save changing em out for when the motor is out.

Money better put towards some twin 3" into 3.5" front pipes.

Well that's good enough for me. There obviously not the best out there but will do the job. Think I'll save changing em out for when the motor is out.

Money better put towards some twin 3" into 3.5" front pipes.

Looking for these too but most tend to be 2.75 into 3 or 3 into 3.

Does anyone know a supplier in melbourne

What size are the racepace front pipes?

And do they have equal length pipes before they merge?

Twin 3 inch merging into a 3.5 or 4 inch. Take your pick. (Why you wouldn't go 4 inch is beyond me).

Forget the japanese junk.... well worth the cash.

You always get used to the power.

Plus you'd still need to do transfer case, front/rear diff, suspension. They make the biggest difference dollar vs gains IMO over power/rebuild - just there is 10k on its own. So add in another 15k for the motor and everything and you've done 25k there. Hence why my GTR was such a bargin really @ 30k, and sold easily :)

can you tell me more about the transfer case mod please???

search drivetrain section - all in there.

Is there much difference with the -9's and gt-ss? On my old car with stock cams and heads, my car kept making more power past 7,500 rpm with gt-ss turbos.

http://i49.tinypic.com/2cgbyv5.jpg

They are identical.

If the graph you linked didn't end @ 7400rpm, you'd see torque fall off even harder than it already has. Boost would be the same as well.

Yeah sure more RPM it might make a little bit more power (10kw), but the turbos are pretty much off the efficiency, falling harder and harder off from boost/torque the more RPM you ask - so you gain nothing by taking it past there. Better off to change gear and fall back into the 6000rpm area.

My comment about it being "all over" by 7500rpm is that both boost and torque have well and truly fallen off by then. Where -5s will keep pressing till 8500rpm on a 2.6 no problem which is a solid 1000rpm more and they aren't falling over.

I've been doing a bit of research here and there, and my exhaust I think is just at maximum capacity for my setup, it seems on 98 and under 400kw, bloody awesome piece of kit. I would have liked to go the RP 4" version.

After researching some more on the -10's topic too, I think I'll stick with the -5's and be happy with what I've got.

A new set of semi's, a brake bleed, and I'll be all good to try the QR clubsprint record again. It's just QR is so setup for big HP over handling, hence the reason I was thinking -10's. Although I'm only 6/10's off the club-sprint record holder, and he is running an R32 with 50kw more. That was my first track day out there with only 15 laps, so maybe a bit more drive time might help.....lol.

-5's seem as they are pretty much one of the best turbo choices for track duties, hands down. The -7's seem good to for a bit less power and super response.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...