Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

@mlr T28BB with better actuator, E85 & usual bolt ons will do 218~227kW (out of 4 S15s I've done). All on Mainline Roller dynos, on a Dyno Dynamics probably 240kW lol

better point them losers to this thread so they can learn to make some real powah

  • Haha 1
3 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

@mlr T28BB with better actuator, E85 & usual bolt ons will do 218~227kW (out of 4 S15s I've done). All on Mainline Roller dynos, on a Dyno Dynamics probably 240kW lol

I though they were only really happy heat wise at around 200, BUT, on 98, BUT, yes, sugar cane juice is magic juice isn't it IRT the evils of heat and knock and "stuff".

I really need to give E85 a go one day, maybe...if I ever get anything that warrants it again.

3 minutes ago, mlr said:

I though they were only really happy heat wise at around 200, BUT, on 98, BUT, yes, sugar cane juice is magic juice isn't it IRT the evils of heat and knock and "stuff".

I really need to give E85 a go one day, maybe...if I ever get anything that warrants it again.

Nah they will still shit the bed. 

 

Flow is flow. E85 or not.

 

 

2 hours ago, BakemonoRicer said:

Dyno results on ethanol are in

It made 324rwkw on 23 pound boost

I'm told that with a built 2.2L bottom "It will make so much power so easy".

Skid video please 

  • Like 4

Dyno graph has been received. Safe conservative tune & torque has been capped at 450nm to suit bottom end/gearbox longevity. Once again the tune is A1 and Scott has done a fantastic job, everything is all neat & tidy and cold start is bang on.

Overall, the head is wanting to rev to around 9,500rpm with the turbo/head combo, so NAPREC have done what I've asked them for!! Anywhere from 400-420kw is possible with a 2.2L stroker.

When the gates come on, it piles on speed VERY fast, point to point the car is a beast. I cannot explain how quick the car revs when it's all in. Next step will be to make a plan for a gearbox, I think a 350z 6 speed with the Mazworx conversion kit would be a treat....but for now I'm double clutching my shifts to keep everything safe & happy, and working towards getting some savings behind me as being at zero savings can't go on any longer lol.

70KziN7.jpg

  • Like 1

Wow man, look at it go, that head is a beast.

 

Ignoring the torque dropping off and power plateauing and being pretty much no where near 9500rpm you can really tell the head something something

  • Haha 1
51 minutes ago, Ben C34 said:

Wow man, look at it go, that head is a beast.

 

Ignoring the torque dropping off and power plateauing and being pretty much no where near 9500rpm you can really tell the head something something

Torque has purposefully been backed off , it’s a conservative tune for safety 

  • Like 1
8 hours ago, Ben C34 said:

Wow man, look at it go, that head is a beast.

 

Ignoring the torque dropping off and power plateauing and being pretty much no where near 9500rpm you can really tell the head something something

Still making power to 8k is no standard SR20 head, that should be obvious surely? So long as it does it consistently of course. 

Benji;
Dropping 50Nm over 1500rpm ain't gonna help a heap at those piston speeds I wouldn't have thought? 

No boost on graph? What's the timing curve like? Did you end up putting in a turbine wheel speed sensor? 
 

  • Like 1
14 hours ago, ActionDan said:

Still making power to 8k is no standard SR20 head, that should be obvious surely? So long as it does it consistently of course. 

Benji;
Dropping 50Nm over 1500rpm ain't gonna help a heap at those piston speeds I wouldn't have thought? 

No boost on graph? What's the timing curve like? Did you end up putting in a turbine wheel speed sensor? 
 

Yeah not particularly phased on people worrying that it's gonna drop off, it's definitely not and the tuner WANTS a 2.2L so he can rev it that high, it doesn't want to stop making power.

So some more on road feedback - it's basically a fraction of a second once its on full boost to shift gear, on the road it is just insane. I actually think it needs a sequential as it's almost too fast for a H pattern, maybe I'd have more confidence though with a 350Z box, as my shifts are super slow.

Unsure why boost isn't on the graph, and yes the EFR has a wheel speed sensor on it but I don't have a display to tell me what turbine speeds are doing, but nor do I really care as the Emtron takes care of it. I've got gauges for oil temp, oil pressure and water temp. I'll get a Defi boost gauge in the coming months as it'd be good to see what boost is doing.

The 70mm ARC intercooler definitely works, everything on the S15 just STAYS at 70°. If I'm really stuck into the GTR the HKS intercooler caps the temp at 80°, so once I take the S15 for a similar drive I'll report back. Both cars have Trust 16 row oil coolers.

12 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Solid result, however if you have a MAP vs. rpm plot that would be good to see as well

I'll have to ask man, if I can be bothered lol

  • Like 1

Nah, missing the point. 

Dropping off 50Nm in the last 1500rpm isn't going to "save" the engine, given the piston speeds at those res anyway. 

If you want safety you want to reduce peak torque in the mid rang and how savagely it makes it, that's what destroys the bottom ends and boxes in them. Ask Evo owners. 

That's all I'm saying - I also do not know exactly what the torque limits of a stock bottom are, but I'd be thinking 450Nm rear wheel would have to be nudging it and I'd cringing a little each time I got up it waiting for the either the rod bolts or the ring lands to fail - but I am a sensitive Susan who always assumes the worst.

Anyway, I hope it lasts many roll racing events and wins all the kebabs and Brazilian honeys hearts. 

The gearbox is rated to 250nm.

At 450nm I give it one good event on good rubber to drop its guts.

My bet is it lets go between 3-4k rpm during a WOT pull.

The little thing will be fun prior to it let going though.

Maybe a slipping clutch might save it?

34 minutes ago, Ben C34 said:

We need to hear the beast. Or is audio equipment not able to handle the sorcery that is a 2 into 1 merge?

The tech exists, I've heard audio of the space shuttle taking off. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...