Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I have a few thermofans left over from previous project cars and I'm after advice on which fan(s) are best suited to an R32 GTR.

I have:

-Spal 16" skew blade puller, is about 85mm thick where motor is.

-Or 2x Spal 12" skew blade pullers.

Just after some confirmation on which setup I should keep before I list on ebay.

Cheers.

  • 2 weeks later...

just search their cfm rating.

Odds on there wouldnt be much in it. So it would otherwise lead to what would be easier to fit (properly) with an associated shroud and thermoswitch n relay etc...

Iv got twin 12" thermos on a 52mm radiator + shroud n i had to mod the fan n the power steering pipe a bit so that it would all fit without interference.

A smaller radiator would be no issue tho. But if you were going to go this size id reccomend going for the big single.

hehehe, in skylines it all comes back to the big single or twins debate doesnt it... :P

It's hard to convince people that

really? i thought it was the other way around?

even as a thermofan user id agree that the stock fan does move more than enough air, also it is self regulating on how hard it 'pulls' based on the temps encountered.

The advantage of thermofans is that they dont run all the time and therefore take power from the motor at all times like the stock fan. In fact with my 52mm alloy radiator the thermofans dont even come on in the winter months unless i get into stop start traffic. Even then they only come on for about 90-120 seconds per cycle.

Also that the old clutch fans are often wearing out n becoming unreliable. Therefore alternatives are worh considering.

Edited by jjman

the power lost by a clutch fan is bugger all, especially since it only engages fully at higher temps. thermo fans don't have a direct drag on the motor, but they increase the load on the alternator, which puts more load on the engine. so they aren't a free power mod as some people believe.

a big fan draws more air than a small fan as it's the tips of the fan that draw the most air as they are travelling faster than the middle of the fan (same rpm, but they travel a further distance). plenty of cars with thermo fans run 2 fans as it allows them to have different stages of cooling. for example, in some cars, in normal conditions/temps, one fan is used for engine cooling, while the other will come on when the air con is turned on.

as for looking for alternatives, sure you could look at fitting thermos, or you could just buy a new clutch for the fan.

personally, if i was going to run a thermo setup, i'd just use the factory setup off another car, and trim the shrouds as need be. i'd be looking at something off a late model falcon, magna or of a smaller fwd car such as a pulsar, corolla, etc. i'd just find something with a similar sized radiator and go from there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...