Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Quickie.

Im searching for a snorkel for my 33 GTR.

Are the 32, 33 and 34 GTR snorkles all roughly the same? Will they all fit my 33? just easier to find one if i have the choice of all 3 models. or do some flow ie bigger then others?

Gtsts do they have the same set up?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/410361-r32-33-34-gtr-or-gtst-snorkel/
Share on other sites

Just while people are looking at the thread. im making a airbox, someone suggested lining it with heat proof stuff. and they got it from clark rubber?

Any idea what the stuffs called or even what it looks like so i can find it/ ask for it?

Have you for pods and trying to enclose it?

Standard airbox is the way to go if you don't have heaps of power or chasing it.

Coincidentally :P

Have a box and snorkel for a r33 Gtr for sale ;)

  • 2 weeks later...

Have you for pods and trying to enclose it?

Standard airbox is the way to go if you don't have heaps of power or chasing it.

Coincidentally :P

Have a box and snorkel for a r33 Gtr for sale ;)

Define "heaps of power".

Can we definatly confirm that the 34 snorkel will fit a standard r33 GTR??

Line up perfect etc

I have tried to put on XKALABA's R34 GTR snorkle on my R33 GTR and from memory the bonnet would't close properly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...