Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Read the whole thread before you post irrational generalisations...

and I dont think that I or any other GTR owners in this post sound like wankers..

I've read the whole thread. Perhaps you need to re-address the issues you are pressing in order to display a more diplomatic approach.

Theres been enough GTST v GTR crap on these boards.

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've read the whole thread. Perhaps you need to re-address the issues you are pressing in order to display a more diplomatic approach.

Theres been enough GTST v GTR crap on these boards.

I never intended on making any comparisons between the GTST GTR.

You should be intelligent enough to realise what I was trying to acheive by reading my initial posting. And yes I did readdress the issue by stating that I should have including skylines as a whole and not just the GTR in a latter post.

either way this is stupid...I didnt realise there was so much tall-poppy syndrome around in a skyline forum.

You guys can take this to the track . im outa this convo before it gets worse :D we should have  acruise to settle this down and all chat about our cars :) hehe comeon guys where suppose to be all friends here in this wonderfull community!

maybe I just wont try and post anything again.... I tried to make a fun post with hopefully some interesting experiences thats all....

the only euro/skyline drag that I know of is when leewahs GTR walloped a V12 Diablo from an 80KM roll, just wanted to hear some similar stories (good or bad) and not get into shlong comparisons between skyline owners. :(

This has been going on for three pages now and I don't think I've seen anyone posting up actual times of these Euro cars.

1999 Lamborghini Diablo GT - Quarter 11.6 seconds

1991 Ferrari F40 - Quarter 11.8 seconds

1995 Ferrari F50 - Quarter 12.1 seconds

Theres just a few, my usual site didn't have too many decent times in regards to BMW, Mercedes and Porsche. Having quite a mental blank at the moment.

Buster, sorry to say your skyline will get whooped by a GTR R33. just put 15psi and zorst the R will flog your ass.

First night out - Zeu5 vs Bu5ter. Let's roll back the clock a bit and you can put $5k on the GT-R with an exhaust, high flowed turbos, etc etc, and then I'll go spend it on beer and hookers.

1999 Lamborghini Diablo GT - Quarter 11.6 seconds

1991 Ferrari F40 - Quarter 11.8 seconds

1995 Ferrari F50 - Quarter 12.1 seconds

Great times, hope we're back on track now.... anyone got qtr time for latest ENzo and Porsche GT2?

Give me a Gemballa GTR-Evo II or RUF Turbo R Porsche.

Or a TVR Cerbera Speed12

Or a Ferrari 360 Challenge Stradale

Or a BRABUS SL65

Or a Rennteck Viper TT

Then bring your Mines R34 and we'll race LaL (at the track of course, officer :))

GT-R is beaut and I'd donate soft, squishy parts of my anatomy to own one but for me Euros are still supreme. That's my 0.000000000000002c anyways....

European build quality? You can't polish a turd, i'm afraid. x2 if it's Italian.

This thread isn't about whether or not the GTR is a supercar or not.

The personal attacks must stop here. The attitudes and opinions should not as this is what makes this such an interesting place to be. I think people should get their facts straight before throwing insults around.

Here's a couple:

1/ BU5TER has run NUMEROUS 11 second passes on an internally stock RB25DET with an RB25DET head. Not "once" as implied in this thread.

2/ The people that speak the loudest and most often about quarter mile times are those that have neither run the times nor have the proof to support their claims. Subsequently, IMHO, these are the people that have the LEAST right to claim what their car does (or worse, SHOULD do).

3/ Brett said that a well set-up gtst could stick it to a GTR. I thouroughly disagree!! An extremely poorly and bodgily set up R33 GTST (backyard bodge) runs high 11's - low 12's ALL DAY!

4/ No, I am NOT one of the people described in point 2.

In short, there are more than one or two people in this thread walking a very fine line. Keep it nice or you will not be welcome on this forum again.

Thankyou.

Adrian

This thread highlights the absolute worst in GTR owners.

You guys need to get over yourselves. The GTR is a great car, but it's PEANUTS when compared to European Supercars (Porsche, Ferrari, Pagani, Koenigsegg, Lamborghini, McLaren, etc).... There's absolutely no comparison.

Buster, sorry to say your skyline will get whooped by a GTR R33. just put 15psi and zorst the R will flog your ass.

That sentence is akin to a torrential downpour of diahorrea. You need to take some Kaopectate for your mouth.

The GTR is not and will never be classed as a SUPERCAR.

A japanese car is not and will never be on the same level as Euro Supercars. (current models)

A GTR 33 is... $40k+/-? A new Merc or BMW is $70k for a very basic model of their cars, bottom line GTR's are fantastic cars, both in terms of performance and dollar for dollar value but lets not get carried away in the sceme of things.

Gotta admit though the gtr's from factory.

Lets compare them to something that is also mass produced. I don't think its fair to compare them to the big names with Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, Bugatti.

To me, it has to be compared to something more like, BMW, Audi etc.

Because when you look at the cars I have mentioned, Ferrari in particular, they are fairly minimalistic. Not much interior on most of them, the dash looks like a few gauges and thats about it.

Compared to a 34 with a full interior, nice dash and cluster, along with all the usual goods you can expect on the r34 gtr.

Thats why I reckon it has to be compared to something more like a BMW or something that has an interior and looks more like an actual passenger car.

I got told the other night of the Audi RS6, have a bit of a look on quarter mile times of that if you can find it. Heres the info I have http://www.supercars.net/cars/2004@$Audi@$...nt%20Plusg.html

now a commodore.. what a supercar :)

To me a supercar is something that costs ridiculously high amounts of money, generally looks ugly as crap inside, and for the most part hand built and only a very limited number are built each year. And will depreciate faster than most will earn in a decade. But straight out of the factory will pounce anything close to a stock car on the road.

Snowman, can answer your question NSX vs GTR, as he has owned both. If I recall correctly, the NSX doesn't come close to his GTR... but I think that had something to do with it being auto... But Snowy's moved up since then and learnt how to drive a manual :)

Seriously, he'd be the best to answer it.

Ok I can answer this question - but there are some considerations here in my opinions on the whole GTR v's Euro supercars.

To answer the my NSX vs My GTR question then I'd have to say the GTR kills it in everyway except for cruising comfort. Its a much greater weapon than the NSX ever was.

HOWEVER - this is because the GTR is MODIFIED. The NSX was stock. And that is the beauty and the reason why I bought the GTR. If I was to get a stock GTR then the difference would be a lot less. But the $$$ to modify an NSX is frightening.

For me - when I think of the question of GTR v Euro supercars I always think of the GTR in its potential form rather than its STOCK form. For those that live in Melbourne and get out to track days, one of the common track day is with the Maserati Club. Now the last day out there was 2 Ferrari 360's and 3 Porsche GT3 RS's as well as many other impessive Euro cars. The fact was that at the end of the day the top 5 times were held by 4 modified GTR's and a modified GTO. (Not me - I was back in 15th! LOL)

Its like all cars - someone mentioned about the BMI vid when the the Evo's and Rex's beat the R34 GTR - again in this instance it was a case of a stock R34 GTR (non V Spec) V's lightly moddified EVO's and Rex's. For me - the Japanese sports cars are designed to be easily modified to gain a great deal of extra performance and that HAS to be considered when comparing them to the Euro cars which are not designed that way. Its also the fault and the reason why I think the GTR is better than the NSX. I think in stock form all the Euro supercars will kill a stock GTR - but then how many stock GTR's are there out there? Make it any Euro super car v's a GTR with $25K worth of mods and it will be a different story.

My 2 cents.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
    • I still have an old R32R left over from when they were a thing in the early 2000's. It was, for its time, done about right. But its time was 20 years ago.  I did try and update it a while back but it was cruelled by a (recommended) muppet of a tuna who couldnt tell his MAP from his TPS. The original spec was: Power FC, 700cc Sards, Nismo pump, 2860-5's, cams (Basically Poncam A's), Z32 AFM's and a half sorted oiling system. Thereabouts 430rwhp irrespective of what was done. So, yeah, very 1990's. I eventually got sick of it not being very refined and bought a Link G4 PNP with some 1000cc Bosch injectors. This was tuned badly and I put the car in the shed for a few years whilst I sulked and went and did other things. Ive come around to the idea of getting it going again so it has a new gearbox installed and some other minor things in the planning. So my questions are, variously (In the context of keeping the Link) What other sensors should I be running eg It has no wideband on it at the moment, nor fuel pressure. $? Is it worth chucking the old ignition system (ignitors etc) for new ignition coils? $2k? Cam/crank angle sensors? Can keep the aircon? $? Anything else? Sorry to launch another what should I do with my car thread but, you know, what should I do with my car? Random photo for historical context.
×
×
  • Create New...