Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

True true fair enough then. I was thinking of future if and when you chase even more power (damn hp itch) externally gating will give you that opportunity now and I the future.

Here's a wee list of mind mate sorry bit log copied it from other post.

Thought I'd have a look and add my info car is currently on the build again bigger turbo and intercooler

But here is some figures when finally complete and

On Dyno will post sheets of new power.

Currently 427kw revs taken to 8800.

Cracked r34 gtt 25det neo

Fully forged from ground up.

Valves seats rings arp head bolts, studs

Wiseco forgiez

Tomei poncams stage 2

Rc 720cc injectors Greddy intake

Hypertune 90mm throttle body

4 inch intake piping all round

SARd external gate

Custome sinco top mount mani

ARE surge pot fuel pump wallbro x 2

Nismo engine mounts to stop torque bend ( still engine pulls hard lol)

Hks t04s 1.0 exhaust wheel (nice change at 4000rpm no valve noise means no cops lol)

Apexi avcr

Apexi el2 gauges oil pressure,temp water And boost

Apexi rsm

3 1/4 inch exhaust with cat back

Arc cold air intake box

Spitfire coilpacks

Upgrade vct module It's awesome keeping vct trust me

Basicly it there's heaps of other things but that's basic core stuff.

427kw atw at 1.4 bar boost

On Bp 98 ultimate

Oh and vipec ecu

Nice to see heaps of other tough 25 and 20dets reppin.

[

what crank are you using to rev so high? thats alot of power for a smallish exhaust and no E85

Edited by SliverS2
  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I have not seen the results of a 52 trim GT3037/GT3076R on an RB30 so I'm not sure if or by how much the slightly smaller trim compressor affects spool/boost threshold . Me thinks a higher CR like 9.5+ would pull up a bit more low end torque pre boost and make it a little more linear with the boot in .

A .

Yeh but on 98? Jungle juice fair enough...

With 9:1, I had enough troubles with the thing pinging when ramping onto max torque! 9.5 would be the limit for me on 98 IMO

I'll check through receipts and shit when I get home Basicly the car was left in the builders hands and told then not too cut costs anywhere so they went all out at Jhh I'm not one too usually do extensive work myself I just save and pay to get it done

Edited by Cyifly

The dyno graph will be uploaded when I get it (tuner was out of printer ink)

I can even provide overlays of 3076 vs GT-RS on the same car.

Keep in mind that this is a 52T as opposed to the more common 56T version of the GT3076 (i.e. better response than a 56T)

It replaced an HKS GT-RS and has (much to my and my tuners surprise) matched the GT-RS for boost response and beaten it for power response.

It makes more power across the entire rev range and the power curve is almost perfectly linear.

Engine (RB25) is stock and has never been cracked, other mods done at the same time as the 3076 were; custom 4" intake, split dump and decat.

Needless to say I am very happy with the results :banana:

Hey jez my tune didn't get finished as there was no controlling the boost so my power is made upto 16psi and at 5400rpm everything after that has no timin and heaps of fuel as it hits 23psi so what I'm wanting is to have this new dump fitted which is being made as we speak to I can get the tune finished at 19/20psi

My problem with boost spike would be because me and Abe got extremely happy with the dremel we ported the manifold turbo flange head everything hahha so if I didn't do that I wouldn't have this problem as I have a 38mm internal flapper now so fingers crossed its just the dump pipe of I didn't port everything it would of been sweet hahaha next step will be e85 crank it upto 340/350rwkw

Got my new dump pipe made and fitted by abe at havoc fabrication 4inch to 3.5 omg no more spike at all not even .5 psi such a big improvement car seems quicker to can't wait for my tune to be finished highly recommend ABE havoc fab for any custom stainless work I love my lobster dump pipe :D links to the pic

https://m.facebook.com/home.php?__user=1335391744#!/photo.php?fbid=10151133194902133&id=709482132&set=o.234262776638808&relevant_count=1&ref=bookmark&__user=1335391744

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...