Jump to content
SAU Community

Is Tomei Parts Made In China?


Chris32R
 Share

Recommended Posts

I was looking at buying a set of tomei rods for my 26 build and came across a couple of threads and sites that suggest that Tomei are making some of their parts from China. Does anyone know if this is true?

I don't want to blow $1200 on rods when they're of poor Chinese quality.

Here is a couple of links that I found:

http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/74699-my-new-h-beam-junk-eagle-rods.html

http://forums.evolutionm.net/evo-general/594101-tomei-parts-made-china.html

In reference to the above link, rhd Japan saying in the link below that they are not stocking tomei parts anymore and they prefer hks:

http://www.rhdjapan.com/tomei-h-beam-conrods-set-rb25det-rb26dett-vq35de-1jz-gte-2jz-gte-26416

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read the whole threads and nowhere does it say that quality is lacking. The only thing it says, and that we all know, is that you pay for the name. Plain and simple

Hi

I havent been here for a while, thats why there is no update.

My car made 530hp 695nm torque at the hubs with these rods and CP pistons.

Still stock head, stock cams, stock ic, stock inntake, stock fuelrail / fuel lines.

And trust me, i have been trashing my car at dragracing / trackdays since last year. Been on long trips, use the car as much as i can and it still runs like a clock. Even with grinded crank (experts on here say they cant be grinded... doh!)

I just put in new engine managment, going in for a re-map later this month i hope.

Thanks

Asim

Hi

Sorry, but i dont remember weights since it is so long ago.

What i remember is visiting all of the well known engine builders here in Norway and every one told me these rods are as good as any other.

And i think Jens Hannestad (the guy who build the engine for the WRC Escort) and people like him now what they are talking about.

I also ordered these same rods for several other RB26 engines, and all of them run healthy as a horse, one of them made 980hp at the crank. (the last couple of sets i ordered was with L19 ARP bolts)

So.... go figure.... smile.gif

Asim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if for some reason you are not comfortable purchasing "tomei" rods, there are many other great quality conrods on the market

ie:

Nitto

Scat

carillo

argo

depends on ur budget etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at buying a set of tomei rods for my 26 build and came across a couple of threads and sites that suggest that Tomei are making some of their parts from China. Does anyone know if this is true?

If you think the majority of the Jap (or US) parts are actually made somewhere other than China/Thailand (ie. Japan/UK/USA), you'll be in for a bit of a shock if you do more digging more of your own research on a bulk basis. It's simple business - do what the competition are, or go bust.

I know for a fact some of the HKS cranks come outta China, and have for quite a while. Just the tip of the iceberg really.

A lot of high profile Aussie brands have stuff ex-China/Thailand as well, and they perform exceptionally.

There is nothing wrong with stuff out of China from a lot of the manufacturers, this isn't 2006 - it's 2012 and times have changed and improved markedly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hit the nail on the head, it'll only get better as well.

A lot of the contracts are pretty closely guarded for obvious reasons, and the factories do understand that saying something will mean work is taken elsewhere - but some of them will sell items "on the side" if you know where to look, all of it without labels/branding and they strangely are identical to items that would come in a labelled/branded box if you get them shipped and compare :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of engine components are 90% made in Asia, then shipped to the country where they are owned to have final machining done.

PS, sending you, the OP a PM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets just say Tomei HAD their tooling done in japan and now its done it China (assumption for those who are worried).

Theres a machine shop that makes the part, and there are engineers who run the shop and make/QA the parts.

What farking difference does it make what country its done in? Same tooling, same product, same quality, SAME thing.

Think about this, an engineer in Aus gets paid upward of 100k.. An engineer in China would get paid less than half that, but would probably be richer than the Aussie. Thats called economics.

Less on tax, less on shipping, less on wages, less on rent, less getting things through customs. Less less less but same product.

Let it go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol not yet... Think if China wasn't bubbling along so well in recent times, we'd be in quite a bit of Financial strife as a country.

Some of that would certainly be car part manufacture, how much, can of worms :D

Its not about war anymore , but i think they are slowly owning us over time even are car manufacturing is dying a slow death
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets just say Tomei HAD their tooling done in japan and now its done it China (assumption for those who are worried).

Theres a machine shop that makes the part, and there are engineers who run the shop and make/QA the parts.

What farking difference does it make what country its done in? Same tooling, same product, same quality, SAME thing.

Nothing wrong with things made in China provided you have your own QA through the life cycle or as many do you don't actually simply let a contract manufacturer but invest in the tooling/plant which is operated under licence in China. In my eyes there is no problem with big players getting things done in China ... but there is a reason why loads of industries do their own QA on raw materials, plus loads of other practices to ensure made in China doesnt ruin their brand.

Now a chinese company going it alone with a product made in China too often = rubbish. My experience is not car parts but engineering industry experiece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main historical problem with manufacture in China and the resultant quality was what happened when people decided that they were goint to get their stuff made over there, went for a visit, got a tour of Factory "A" with some guy who showed them all the modern equipment and swore black and blue that the gear would get manufactured there, then came home to Australia and were happy with the first 3 shipments of gear. Problem being that in the 3 weeks after their visit to Factory "A", that same facility got shown to 3 other wannabe outsourcers, and each time the manufacture got shuffled down to Factory "B", then "C", and the quality took a gradual swandive until the market or Australian QA/QC people chucked the shits and the whole lot came to a grinding halt.

Those that committed to actually setting up shop themselves and supervised what was being done at every stage always had good product come out of China. But in the early days they were in the minority. The biggest problem that these people had was the backdoor selling of their gear at knockdown pricing and the rampant theft of IP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

China is where all manufacturing of goods is heading. Look here in Australia and you see it all the time. Australia is pricing its self out because of our ridiculous cost of things and big businesses is forcing it to happen by trying to be competitive

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You cant compete when your opposition starts getting there products made in china coz china does not trade its currency and undervalue it and has done that deliberately to keep workers and manufacturing costs low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have met Aki Sasaki, President of Tomei and have had the pleasure of dinner with him in 2012.

Tomei take their manufacturing very seriously and are all about quality control, regardless of the country they are made in. It is not as competitive to make everything in Japan like they used to.

With approx $200 million of stock in the USA, they need to ensure that things are made and sold at competitive margin.

The chinese are brilliant manufactures, but are 100% clueless as to what they make and why it has to be a certain way. I have visited factories and facilities you get good and bad facilities depending on the operators.

The good facilities have engineers as owners. The bad ones have people looking to copy and make a quick buck. The only way you can tell is if you go to the factory and have a good look around at their manufacturing.

Wages for good manufacturing employees are around $100-$150 USD per week, 40hr work week, paid overtime etc and includes boarding / meals etc.

Graduates that work at HSBC or similar in accounting / auditing roles - approx 700-800 usd per month, paid monthly as a salary and lots of overtime when required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...