Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi folks,

This is on a 1995 R33 GTR V-spec with a stock FPR and injectors and 2 year old fuel filter. With an unknown fuel pump...initially... and the car is definitely running on the rich side with a powerfc using the base map and the idle routine is complete. It drives okay...but definitely rich (on mixture and pocket!)

Some time ago I bought a mechanical fuel pressure gauge to plug into the fuel line just after the fuel filter before heading off to the fuel rail and injectors. I measured the pressure according to many articles I've read on this and other skyline forums and my results have been:

at idle: ~43psi

at idle with vacuum line to FPR disconnected: ~50psi

These figures I believe are high for a gtr...i've seen posts which basically say it should be 2.5 bar(or 36psi) at idle and 3.0 bar(or 43 psi) with vacuum line disconnected. The R34 gtr service manual and R32 service manual also corroborates these figures(I haven't seen specific references in any Nissan documentation for the R33 GTR)

Now my old fuel pump was never holding line pressure with the power switched off and it was very likely just the stock fuel pump which would make it pretty old so I recently had the opportunity to buy a Nismo GTR fuel pump and I have installed that and also replaced all the pressurized fuel lines(ie the ones from the fuel tank to the metal runners behind the right rear wheel and the ones in the engine bay) with some new high pressure fuel tubing and for good measure I also replaced the fuel filter. So after replacing all the stuff and measuring the fuel pressures I get exactly the same figures...

My thoughts are:

Is this fuel pressure within some level of tolerance and effectively normal? (I doubt this but it might be possible) Hence I need not go any further except get the car tuned.

This fuel pressure is high and hence raising the amount of fuel going into the engine - more than what the powerfc thinks is going in.

If this fuel pressure is too high and should be addressed, I suspect that the only piece left in the equation is the FPR which is just a stock item. By chance I happen to have a nismo adjustable FPR I got some time ago cheap and never had a need to use. Is it worth me changing over to the nismo FPR and setting the idle fuel pressure to 2.5 bar (or 43 psi)? Or would this potentially mask the real problem whatever it may be and not be a good idea (yet?).

Are there any other possible causes for this high fuel pressure? (Other than the mechanical pressure gauge is reading incorrectly... I shall investigate this just in case...)

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/411313-high-fuel-pressure/
Share on other sites

Of course you get the same figures, it is the reg that controls the pressure, not the pump.

You must have a very high idle, with a low idle there is much more vacuum which will drop the pressure even more. If you are still worried, swap the reg. More than likely the gauge is out by a bit though.

Of course you get the same figures, it is the reg that controls the pressure, not the pump.

You must have a very high idle, with a low idle there is much more vacuum which will drop the pressure even more. If you are still worried, swap the reg. More than likely the gauge is out by a bit though.

This

Pressure is restriction to flow, the Pump creates the flow, the regulator restricts the flow on the exit of the fuel rail.

It is possible your gauge is out as above or the FPR is a bit dodgy. But it isn't really that big a deal. I know its not the cheapest option but you can just go and get it retuned (It looks like you have a Power FC) and the car will run fine.

Having said that, if you drop the base pressure, you'll have to get a re-tune anyway as the fuel pressure under load will be a tad lower and thats a bit more dangerous then it being a bit rich

I'd just take it for a retune, I dont think your Dangerously above the standard base pressure but if your that worried about it, replace the FPR (Maybe borrow a stock FPR if you know someone) and see if that fixes it and get a re-tune then

  • 2 weeks later...

Possible causes: slight blockage in return line, either gunk in hardline or internal swelling of a rubber hose. Blockage or fault in fuel pressure reg itself. Aftermarket fuel pump delivering a high volume of fuel, which the regulator can not return quick enough.

For a start i'd try get a hold of a good quality or known accurate fuel pressure gauge and then go from there. You can also do a simple fuel flow test to determine the actual flow rate of the pump if it's unknown.

Edited by _x_FiReStOrM_x_

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...