Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Also looking at getting a PAR dog engagement gearset, 1st-4th, pretty cheap. Any reccomendations?

All I'll say is - do your research. Enough info just on this forum alone to make a decision about that type of thing...

PPG Dogboxes seems to be the strongest on the market at the moment, I have great results with mine. Just remember to upgrade the stock sandwich plate with a billet item cause if that fails then everything will as well. Have done over 50+ runs, all over 800-1000awhp going through it, you wear clutches out before the gearbox I highly recommend them.

there goes that idea then! must remember, you get what you pay for -.-

man up and get an OS88 sequential! :P

but def keep us posted as to what you do because ill be heading down the same path shortly so will be interested to see which way you go

Edited by Frosty

Hi everyone,

About time we posted this up - here are the specs on our "NITTO" R34 GT-R:

STANDARD RB26DETT bottom end

ARP headstuds

Nitto Headgasket

Standard oil pump

Custom head by Mercury Motorsport

6Boost mani

Precision 7675BB turbo

Twin Precision wastegates

4" exhaust custom made

Haltech Platinum Pro ECU etc.

Upgraded fuel system

Splitfire coils

100mm thick FMIC

Custom i/c piping

OS Giken sequential gearbox

Power: 622awkw/845awhp @ 43psi (ran in 5th gear, to keep the 1:1 ratio due to gear changes, 6 straps holding it down)

Nicely done. It's no easy feat to make 850hp but glad to see you finally decided to run it and put the shit talkers to rest.

I can gladly agree that you indeed make over 800hp and am very interested to see you push that stocker as far as it will let you. At this point, even if it broke, you're currently making more hp than any other stock RB26 that I know of. Well done

Not sure if you are talking about Oz, or in the world... but Manny Cruz in the States claimed ~950whp for the stock bottom end RB26 he had in his Sentra drag car back in 2005, lots of people called BS - though the car ran mid 7s at >170mph and there is no reason for him to have lied about the internals - DSport in the US also had an R33 GTR they were claiming ~800whp for a few years ago with twin RX6s on the stock motor IIRC.

Not when it weighs 1700kg

It would either need that power with 1400kg to run 150 or it would need to make 1000hp at the weight it is.

Cheers Dan...

The Powertune GTR weighs 1800kgs including driver (we thought 1700kgs too, but speaking with Chea, it was 1800). Anthony & Trent are about the same weight & both cars are in full street trim with big brakes. We'll weigh NITTO in due course! :)

Mates vl calais 1400kg plus driver, with 385rwkw ran 139mph.

Same guy now has aprox 550rwkw vl running 9.0@155 mph.

I'd be more inclined to question those figures than Powertune's - but you can't compare them straight up anyway, unless the VL also bogged, and was running 20" rims wearing low profile basic street tyres. 142mph in a full weight honest street spec GTR with a 2.6litre engine (with stock internals so probably not big rpm) is insane, anyone knocking the time or power figures really outta take stock for moment.

I just copied this from another post......

I just ran our NITTO R34 GTR at the drags on saturday at Willowbank.

Ran a 10.39@142mph on Hero 255/30R20 tyres, Tein Monoflex coilovers, OS88 gearbox, standard 05U rb26 with precision 7675 turbo making 845hp @ all four wheels.

1.77 60ft

4.69 330ft

6.9 1/8mile (107mph)

8.799 1000ft

10.39 1/4mile (142mph)

Mates vl calais 1400kg plus driver, with 385rwkw ran 139mph.

Same guy now has aprox 550rwkw vl running 9.0@155 mph.

Slicks and auto vs Street tyres and manual... Thus why you can't compare times and mph

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Getting a decent signal from all 6 throats is a challenge. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that the stock balance tube is not ideal for it. I have done it on an ALFA 4 cylinder (about 35 years ago, so don't ask for too many details). We drilled 4x holes in the manifold runners, put in some fittings and ran hoses to a decent sized (I think it was about 20mm diameter) pipe that ran the length of the inlet manifold. So, it was quite a decent volume. There is a "tuning" balance to be found between the volume of the common plenum on such a thing and the diameter of the pipes running from it to the runners. You need the volume to be large enough to damp out the sharp spikes in pressure signal you get as each runner gets sucked on by its cylinder, but not so large that it becomes too slow to respond to actual changes in MAP. And you need the hoses to be small enough to transmit the signal quickly, but not so small that they delay the signal. You might have to have more than one go at it, if there isn't any actual success based wisdom to be had here. Hopefully there is. Anyway, I would not do it on only a couple of cylinders. I would also not care about "permanently modifying a part". Just bloody drill holes and make stuff better. There is nothing sacred about any GTR unless it is a genuine museum piece that you shouldn't be modifying at all anyway.
    • He's still joining you, he's just delayed it and won't have the fulleh sick ITBs...
    • The strange thing is this is a URAS front bumper (or clone of it). The bumper actually does not sit flush with the GTT hood - You need the addon to make the hood 'long' enough to reach the bumper. I have no idea why they didn't incorporate this piece into the bumper itself.. instead of sticking it to the hood instead.
    • Another thought on this OLD topic: When you paint your bonnet lip, leave a small unpainted back lip/line along the back of the lip, where it rests on the bumper. That way, the line in the back is much more prominent than the gaps in the front/under the lip - and it breaks the hood-to-bumper connection at the "correct" place, when comparing to a GTR. I'm gonna do this with mine this week, so stay tuned for pics!
    • So I'm in the final stages of assembling my single turbo RB30/26 and had a question regarding MAP reference points.  I've seen several recommendations such as tapping the cylinder 2/3 ITB, tapping the intake manifold at cylinder 2/3, or using a point on IAC. First two are doable but require permanently modify part and the third is "out" as I plan to delete the IAC.  All that to say my question is can I used the "bleeder" in the center of the ballance tube as a MAP Reference? I'm running a catch can so I don't need it for the PCV system. My thought process is it "pulls" from all 6 cylinder, and it's between the ITB and the cylinders making it ideal for MAP reference according to what I can find. Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...