Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mates vl calais 1400kg plus driver, with 385rwkw ran 139mph.

Same guy now has aprox 550rwkw vl running 9.0@155 mph.

cozza manual ran 139mph at heathcote, so maybe less elsewhere, and he took the interior out aswell, it ran less mph before that

I really only see it running 134-135mph with interior in it at another track really

cheers

darren

Didn't the R32 GTR "JUN" run 155mph with around 850hp?

R32 GTRs are A LOT lighter than R34 GTRs... We are unable to run smaller than 20" rims on NITTO due to the massive brakes. We cannot put 20" semis on it either as they simply won't clear the rear guards (not keen on damaging the House of Kolor paint!)

You cannot compare a VLT or any other car to this one, either than another R34 GTR that has similar power, a sequential gearbox & was run with 20s with normal "street" tyres :)

Remember - that 10.3 @ 142 was Trent's FIRST EVER run down the quarter in NITTO. To do that time & trap speed straight off the bat was freaking awesome, a lot of wheel spin was experienced on the launch as well so a 9 was not out of the question. We will be putting smaller brakes on the car so we can fit smaller rims & some MT Streets, then take it back down in due course - join the RH9 club!

You're not taking into consideration the weight of the 6-pot caliper/355mm rotor fronts & 4-pot caliper/320mm rotor rears! ;)

How will that equate to 13mph slower down the 1/4? Funny you mention the tyres, they will only matter for the ET. My dads old 350rwkw R33 was trapping 130mph on streets tyres and MT streets but times were hugely different.

Fark there are some serious haters in here...lol

1340338763034.jpg

No hate from me, its an amazing car and its even more amazing that its making that power on a standard bottom end. Tuned very well, just curious as to how a small weight increase will equal such a large difference in trap speed.

How will that equate to 13mph slower down the 1/4? Funny you mention the tyres, they will only matter for the ET. My dads old 350rwkw R33 was trapping 130mph on streets tyres and MT streets but times were hugely different.

WEIGHT!!!

Redline is at 8000rpm due to standard bottom end.

Edited by NITTO R34

Here's the setup I am currently running.

Power is a tad over 900awhp or 671kw's @ 30 PSI of boost on E85

PB of 8.97sec at 150mph makes it 2nd Fastest Street Tyred Manual Gearbox GTR in the World

-HKS T62R Turbo

-Jun 2.7lt Stroker kit with Custom 86mm CP Pistons. Godzilla Spec Engine.

-Godzilla Motorsport Race Head

-Custom Jun 295 degree x 11.8mm Lift

-Full Tomei Valvetrain.

-Hypertune Plenum with 4" Throttle Body

-ARE 150mm Intercooler

-Trust Exhaust Manifold with 50mm Wastegate

-2000cc Injectors

-Vipec V88

-M & W CDI Ignition with Weapon X CDI Coils

-5 x Bosch 044 fuel pumps

-Peterson 4 stage Dry Sump Setup

-4 Inch Exhaust

-NPC Twin Plate Clutch

-PPG 5 Speed Dogbox with Ignition Cut.

Here's what 8sec with H-Pattern Looks like. :yes:

This may be covered but whats the exact reasoning for 5 044s?

This may be covered but whats the exact reasoning for 5 044s?

One was a lift pump to surge tank and the other 4 feed the fuel rail, the car only needed 3 to run that power and the 4th one was a spare just incase one dropped out during a run. Doesn't matter anymore that fuel system has been sold and a new Aeromotive Mechanical fuel pump will be going in along with a smaller 15L Fuel Tank. All in the aim of saving some weight.

R32 GTRs are A LOT lighter than R34 GTRs... We are unable to run smaller than 20" rims on NITTO due to the massive brakes. We cannot put 20" semis on it either as they simply won't clear the rear guards (not keen on damaging the House of Kolor paint!)

You cannot compare a VLT or any other car to this one, either than another R34 GTR that has similar power, a sequential gearbox & was run with 20s with normal "street" tyres :)

Remember - that 10.3 @ 142 was Trent's FIRST EVER run down the quarter in NITTO. To do that time & trap speed straight off the bat was freaking awesome, a lot of wheel spin was experienced on the launch as well so a 9 was not out of the question. We will be putting smaller brakes on the car so we can fit smaller rims & some MT Streets, then take it back down in due course - join the RH9 club!

What do you think of the Precision 7675?, tried any GTX4202's to compare to?

cheers

darren

Everyone keeps running these large frame turbo's and for what, they take up all your engine bay space, you need a big f**k off steam pipe manifold to hold them up and they don't produce as much HP as the smaller turbo's. I got the shit bagged out of me when i said i was gonna run a 8sec pass with a T62R. Well guess what i done it, with a H Pattern box no doubt, no weak sequential shit that breaks every 3rd run for me. There are a lot of non believer's out there that think everything is impossible, i like to think the opposite. What is possible? And i am thinking that breaking the 8.47sec pass set by the RH9GTR with a Auto box is possible with a H Pattern box. Time will tell but i am confident this is very achievable considering how easy it was to run a 8sec pass, and the car potential is just starting to show.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Getting a decent signal from all 6 throats is a challenge. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that the stock balance tube is not ideal for it. I have done it on an ALFA 4 cylinder (about 35 years ago, so don't ask for too many details). We drilled 4x holes in the manifold runners, put in some fittings and ran hoses to a decent sized (I think it was about 20mm diameter) pipe that ran the length of the inlet manifold. So, it was quite a decent volume. There is a "tuning" balance to be found between the volume of the common plenum on such a thing and the diameter of the pipes running from it to the runners. You need the volume to be large enough to damp out the sharp spikes in pressure signal you get as each runner gets sucked on by its cylinder, but not so large that it becomes too slow to respond to actual changes in MAP. And you need the hoses to be small enough to transmit the signal quickly, but not so small that they delay the signal. You might have to have more than one go at it, if there isn't any actual success based wisdom to be had here. Hopefully there is. Anyway, I would not do it on only a couple of cylinders. I would also not care about "permanently modifying a part". Just bloody drill holes and make stuff better. There is nothing sacred about any GTR unless it is a genuine museum piece that you shouldn't be modifying at all anyway.
    • He's still joining you, he's just delayed it and won't have the fulleh sick ITBs...
    • The strange thing is this is a URAS front bumper (or clone of it). The bumper actually does not sit flush with the GTT hood - You need the addon to make the hood 'long' enough to reach the bumper. I have no idea why they didn't incorporate this piece into the bumper itself.. instead of sticking it to the hood instead.
    • Another thought on this OLD topic: When you paint your bonnet lip, leave a small unpainted back lip/line along the back of the lip, where it rests on the bumper. That way, the line in the back is much more prominent than the gaps in the front/under the lip - and it breaks the hood-to-bumper connection at the "correct" place, when comparing to a GTR. I'm gonna do this with mine this week, so stay tuned for pics!
    • So I'm in the final stages of assembling my single turbo RB30/26 and had a question regarding MAP reference points.  I've seen several recommendations such as tapping the cylinder 2/3 ITB, tapping the intake manifold at cylinder 2/3, or using a point on IAC. First two are doable but require permanently modify part and the third is "out" as I plan to delete the IAC.  All that to say my question is can I used the "bleeder" in the center of the ballance tube as a MAP Reference? I'm running a catch can so I don't need it for the PCV system. My thought process is it "pulls" from all 6 cylinder, and it's between the ITB and the cylinders making it ideal for MAP reference according to what I can find. Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...