Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Grab a pair of R34 GTR dumps? not 100% on the size but been proven to flow more then you currently have.

If it was me just get some big F off 3 inch dumps!! :D

And "high" flow that cat!

I'm already running r34 dump pipe. I thought the r34 were pretty much the same as the tomei so I never thought 3 inch dump pipe were sold. (beside going custom, I expect)

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

got tuned yesterday. its 3 celcius out there. traction is no good so very hard to tell how ir really drive. so far its good but was hoping for a little better kick in the seat. I managed a 11.8 at 121mph yesterday but like I said, traction was very bad, I was slipping so badly and I don't have any slick, just regular sumitomo tires.

I'm in north america, not australia. What you mean no resolution ?

I ran 11.6 @ 119mph in my old 32 GTR, that was making only 318rwkw(gt-ss) so you most definitely aren't making the power you say you are. My friend also ran 11.2 @ 128mph in his 33 GTR making 412rwkw(-5), that's the mph you should be hitting.

Also what's with so many people saying -5's are making sub 350 with only "lucky" ones getting near 400? My current made 380awkw and as i mentioned before my mate made 412rwkw, both on 98. I would be pretty disgusted if i only made 350rwkw on -5's :/

The 412rwkw spoken of is a bad example, his clutch was slipping on the day. His clutch did not bite in 3rd most the time, but also sometimes in 1st and 2nd. He only got one clean run with a 60ft of 1.87s/11.27s/127mph. His 60ft is slower then yours yet his time and trap speed are the same, so quite possibly 3rd gear slipping again.

The 412rwkw spoken of is a bad example, his clutch was slipping on the day. His clutch did not bite in 3rd most the time, but also sometimes in 1st and 2nd. He only got one clean run with a 60ft of 1.87s/11.27s/127mph. His 60ft is slower then yours yet his time and trap speed are the same, so quite possibly 3rd gear slipping again.

Yeah sorry, forgot to mention that.

yup. dynapack reading 2wd.

Your dyno is setup wrong, whats the HP correction mode? sounds like its the old din or STP mode that reads flywheel.... it should say SAE 2004 which is the latest correction method up the top of the dyno sheet like these.

I have the latest dynapack and can tell you there is no hope in hell that car would make that power if the dyno was setup correctly.

Post up a graph so we can see the correction, it will help your tuner get more realistic results.

https://www.facebook...ChequeredTuning

177997_424390554271548_1282638135_o.jpg

413250_429341537109783_169901599_o.jpg

56324_456853307691939_1982043525_o.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...