Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NA rb's most certainly do NOT come with 2.5" standard. unless you bought your car new from nissan you can't say that it has the stock exhaust. more than likely your car has the exhaust from a turbo r33, which run 2.5" standard. and make sure you measure inside diameter, as that is what they use when measuring exhaust size.

While installing my muffler the inlet matched the exhaust pipe which was 2.5 inch, the n/a r33s came with 2 different exhaust styles, some came with a butterfly valve from factory(my exhaust), some did not. I know for certain my r33's exhaust is from factory since my friend has the exact same car, and his exhaust is also a 2.5 inch with a butterfly valve on the right tip. I know im right since i actually welded the muffler on myself.

NA rb's most certainly do NOT come with 2.5" standard. unless you bought your car new from nissan you can't say that it has the stock exhaust. more than likely your car has the exhaust from a turbo r33, which run 2.5" standard. and make sure you measure inside diameter, as that is what they use when measuring exhaust size.

as for 2.5L exhaust size vs 3.8L exhaust size, you have to take into account the rev range of the car as well. obviously a smaller engine that revs higher will flow similar amounts of exhaust gas at high rpm, but at the lower rev range it will flow less. the wider the rev range, the harder it is to get an exhaust size right. 2.5" is probably good for a 2.5L engine if you are going to spend a lot of time at high rpm, but if you only cruise around at lower rpm then it will drone like a mofo (as most people find out), as well as not flow as great as a smaller diameter pipe (so give you a bit less torque).

2.5L screaming at max RPM of 7000RPM = 8750 Litres per minute of air ingested (At a perfect efficiency, but in actual fact it will be closer to 80% of that number)

4L (Falcon) tipping over at 6000RPM is 12,000 litres per minute of air ingested.

Take into account they're both NA, exhaust gas temp should be relatively the same, meaning that the exiting gas volume should be quite comparable.

I'd run the 2.5" on the 4L, and a 2.25" on the 2.5L as it doesn't need the high end gas flow, as it just doesn't have the need for it.

while i agree with the point you are making, you can't simply apply that sort of basic calculation to it. it doesn't take into account the difference in intake efficiency, which then also determines the amount of fuel that will go in and what sort of bang you get.

given that the majority of older commodores and falcons only rev to 5000 (falcons) and 5500 (3.8L commodores) and only put out similar max power to the skyline, they would be put out similar sort of amounts of exhaust gas.

as for the 2.5" stock exhaust, your mate's car may have also had a turbo exhaust put on because they didn't come out with 2.5" stock, as that is the size they used on the turbo skylines. given that on their 2.0L engines (such as the sr20) they weren't even using 2", they certainly wouldn't be going over half an inch bigger for only half a litre bigger engine.

4. Don't come back in A months time and complain that it's Droney, audibly loud natro skylines will be Droney on the highway, don't like it keep it quiet it's as simple as that.

+1 to that.

I have a 2.25" mild steel catback, no reso(i know it's silly), and a small muffler (red back i think) and on the highway it is just so droney.

Not worth your money and efforts is my 2c

as for the 2.5" stock exhaust, your mate's car may have also had a turbo exhaust put on because they didn't come out with 2.5" stock, as that is the size they used on the turbo skylines. given that on their 2.0L engines (such as the sr20) they weren't even using 2", they certainly wouldn't be going over half an inch bigger for only half a litre bigger engine.

Yea you might be right, ill look into it, maybe its just from the resonator onwards thats 2.5inch, rest might just be 2.25.

  • 5 weeks later...

Just stay with stock, iv'e currently got a stock system with cannon muffler sounds not too loud but still gets the police attention as i got defected for it and he didn't even hear it.. just asumed its too loud coz of having a cannon..., will be switching the muffler back to stock

Na if you did that you would lose all the backpressures and then lose so many killerwasps.

although everyone know noise=speed therefore more noise obviously = more speed

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Result of another R35GTR build. Similar specs as above except this is running our bigger size SS-2 profile option. Made similar power except this car runs on Pump 98 fuel. Build specs are: Nissan R35 GTR 2015 model stock engine and box. ETS street intercooler boost logi intercooler piping with tial bov, boost logi turbo inlet pipe ID 1050 injector DW 300C fuel pump Decatted oem down pipe and y pipe& HKS exaust 3inch intake pipe Upgraded actautors HyperGear SS-2 high flow option Final result is 639whp / 477wkws hubs, Ron 93 / P98 fuel at 20psi.  
    • Duncan:- it affect both sides.  Driver side is worse.
    • That seems like a very special issue!  Does it affect both sides? Either way, I would disconnect the driver's side switch and see if it still happens, noting that might require removal of the whole door card which is a bit of a pain (it does on V37 and HY51)  
    • MBS206:- The windows start to slowly open themselves. GTSBoy:- Battery is new since Dec. 
    • I currently have a 2008 370GT Coupe, with the big brakes (Akebeno if I'm correct), and Its coming time to get new pads. Previously, I had a 2003 350GT Coupe with the stock sized brakes, not Brembos. I had custom wheels on it that were pretty open to the brakes, and when I first put the wheels on it, the rims where completely coated with brake dust. A few years after adding the new rims, I needed to change to pads on that car. I didn't do any research, but I told the mechanic of the problem with the brake dust. I also told him I didn't track the car or even drive around the streets harshley. But the dust was an issue. The mechanics changed the pads to a different compound, and the dust was GONE! The other change I noted was that when coming to a complete stop, instead of having to press harder on the pedal as I approached 0kph, I had to actually lift off a little to not come to a hard jerky stop.( My unfounded explanation is they became stickier as they heated by stopping ) Since I got my 370gt with big brakes, I noticed that that as I came closer to stopping, I had to press harder and harder to reach a full stop. I am not talking about hard, just harder. I brought the car in from another state, so when I had a blue slip done, I asked the mechanic what he thought of the brakes, and he thought they were brilliant. The only negative of these pads on the 350GT, was that they squealed when cold. So driving out of a shopping center carpark, it was a little embarrassing, as the brakes squealed, and I am sure people thought that I needed new brakes, when they were actually fresh. I have no idea of what type of compound they were on the 350gt, but whatever it was, I want to get the exact same on my 370GT. They weren't ridiculously expensive, and were replaced at the local JAX (which is no longer open), so I am certain they would be a pretty common big brand, off the shelf type/brand. My current mechanic suggested I need top get the rear pads changed soonish, but he suggested standard Brembo pads. Which I expect to behave the same as the current ones and not like the ones on the 350GT.  I don't think dust will be an issue on the 370GT. With the behaviour I describe above on the 360GT, does anyone have a suggestion of pad material that will act like the change I had done on the 350GT?
×
×
  • Create New...