Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone on here used a ts2b clutch before?!? To suit push type 32 GTR-33 GTST?!?!

I have 3 carriers to go with the clutch. A 20mm, 12mm(haven't measured this one) and an 8mm!

We've put the clutch on and used the 20mm carrier but its compressing the diaphragm springs as the box is going back on!!

20mm carrier was what was listed to be used with this clutch!

Can anyone tell me what they've used or post up a picture or something. Maybe some accurate measurements!

Heres a picture of the 20mm and 8mm carriers

post-14265-0-90455500-1350781385_thumb.jpg

Edited by Turbz_13

Where are you taking the measurement from (20/8mm)?

The one on the left looks like the short one. You need to use that carrier but it looks like you have the wrong bearing on it. The OS Giken uses a small diameter throw out bearing. Not the standard one

hey mate,

sorry yeah the one on the left was the 8mm carrier and the right the 20mm carrier. and i have one that has come out of the car thats about 12mm, i didnt get the chance to measure it and it still at the car at the place we were working on it. ill get correct measurements when i get back to the car!!

taking the measurements from the release fork pad to the back of the bearing.

the one on the right, the 20mm carrier, is what i was told i needed to use with this clutch. the bearing on the 8mm carrier isnt what im using, i tool the clutch to a clutch place and got the correct bearing to suit the clutch.

i just edited an image for this purpose but. i measure my carrier like "A#" in the diagram, unless its a total sleeve length or measurement "B#" is where i need to get the 20mm from?!

post-14265-0-84112400-1350803593_thumb.jpg

Edited by Turbz_13

I do have a part number for the nissan carrier that os giken listed to use with the clutch, but i cant find any info at all or pictures of it

30501-K0401

Edited by Turbz_13

thanks mate! cheers for the help!

that's the one i originally got with the clutch but i made some calls to the australian "os giken" distributors JUST to be sure, who told me to get a 20mm carrier!

i have the bearing(isnt in the picture) i took the clutch to the clutch shop to get looked over and made sure it was still in good order and to get the correct bearing for it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...