Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 254
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

a ok, must bet he 92 then. As they got a V8 S65 swapped in there at some stage..

Not sure what you guys are talking about here, i might be off topic but when it comes to BMW's 3 series the numbers are just different body types.

e90's are 4 door, e91's are wagon, e92 are two door coupes and e93 are convertible.

Doesn't matter whether they're M3 or ordinary 318i it's still same code. The e90 and e92 m3's are 4.0 V8's and m5's are 5.0 V10 which is what Sunkist was refering to. Sorry if iv drifted off topic.

Edited by miran1313

Not sure what you guys are talking about here, i might be off topic but when it comes to BMW's 3 series the numbers are just different body types.

e90's are 4 door, e91's are wagon, e92 are two door coupes and e93 are convertible.

Doesn't matter whether they're M3 or ordinary 318i it's still same code. The e90 and e92 m3's are 4.0 V8's and m5's are 5.0 V10 which is what Sunkist was refering to. Sorry if iv drifted off topic.

Nope makes sense.

If only if it still looked like this HIRISK

The only difference from then to now is the wheels and Z-Tune front end.

I do like the SSR SP1 but they needed to run spacers to clear the brakes, which I am not a big fan of doing.

But the Z-Tune front end is nice and certainly makes it look very aggressive.

I may do a Z-Tune front end one day, but just can't afford out right now.

3820947151_55e4ae03af.jpg

would wood

Nope, e93 is a tad fugly.

E90

^that's an E60 M5

m3 v8... white with ducktail and carbon roof...

tumblr_lcxe9azA1P1qbj46wo1_400.gif

sorry to go off topic, but my old man's just bought a white E92 just you described. No ducktail boot (yet)

but he's got the carbon roof and the black BBS's

only driven it a few times, but fuuuuuuck it's in another class.

downshifts are orgasmic

tumblr_mc4qocC9CX1qkir2zo2_500.jpg

tumblr_mc4qocC9CX1qkir2zo1_500.jpg

Edited by alex182

The only difference from then to now is the wheels and Z-Tune front end.

I do like the SSR SP1 but they needed to run spacers to clear the brakes, which I am not a big fan of doing.

But the Z-Tune front end is nice and certainly makes it look very aggressive.

I may do a Z-Tune front end one day, but just can't afford out right now.

There is a time and place for z-tune, yours is awesome without. Clean.

The only difference from then to now is the wheels and Z-Tune front end.

I do like the SSR SP1 but they needed to run spacers to clear the brakes, which I am not a big fan of doing.

But the Z-Tune front end is nice and certainly makes it look very aggressive.

I may do a Z-Tune front end one day, but just can't afford out right now.

yeah he probably chose the wrong *-disk option when getting the wheels. Didn't think of brake clearance. Looked awesome right now nonetheless.

sorry to go off topic, but my old man's just bought a white E92 just you described. No ducktail boot (yet)

but he's got the carbon roof and the black BBS's

only driven it a few times, but fuuuuuuck it's in another class.

downshifts are orgasmic

tumblr_mc4qocC9CX1qkir2zo2_500.jpg

tumblr_mc4qocC9CX1qkir2zo1_500.jpg

wow mint car man, my current dream car! and Sam its truly suprised to see that 95% of negative comments of my car have come from you, my mate of 9+ years, guess that little facebook popularity contest meant alot to you...

Hi to everyone else, show and shine was great! never seen so many crazy cars in one place! and all members were very friendly and welcoming! ive joined up and became a paying memeber on Sunday so I can get my CAMS license and have abit of fun on the track days with you guys

wow mint car man, my current dream car! and Sam its truly suprised to see that 95% of negative comments of my car have come from you, my mate of 9+ years, guess that little facebook popularity contest meant alot to you...

lol what negative comments.

yeah he probably chose the wrong *-disk option when getting the wheels. Didn't think of brake clearance. Looked awesome right now nonetheless.

right disk option!! 19x10.5+12 ssr professors- just didnt factor in endless 6-pot 360mm brakes!!

New episode is up... ...Enjoy the silliness in full HD...

And if you can, let the ad roll at the start... ...Thanks...

Haha Alvin FTW!

I hear theres more footage of Alvin. Do a behind the scenes edit of him :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...