Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

This is something I’ve been meaning to post up for a while now to give something back to the hive of quality information that is SAU.

Anyone who has tried to tune an RB26 engine is aware that the standard air temperature sensor is completely useless for measuring actual air temperature. No doubt it works great as a water temperature sensor (for which it is also used in the RB26) but why it was chosen to measure air temperature is beyond me. It responds extremely slowly and in the factory position measures nothing more than the temperature of the plenum. I’m sure the smart people at Nissan new what they were doing, but for the aftermarket street tuner it isn’t particularly useful.

For those restricted to using the Power FC, even with the Datalogit, there is no ability to alter the resistance vs temperature curve for any of the measurements and, as such, cannot easily swap over to a modern sensor that responds at a reasonable rate.

The method I propose involves the use of a Delphi Air Temperature Sensor (GM Part # 25036751). These are very common and used on a wide range of cars, hence they are cheap, reliable and easy to obtain. The resistance vs temperature curves don’t match but I have found with the addition of the correct resistor in parallel it is plenty good enough. Originally I was planning on adding another thermistor in parallel but found that this technique provided good results over the range I was concerned with and keeping things simple has its advantages.

I measured the resistance of the factory RB26 sensor in 5 degree increments over the range of 0 to 90 degrees Celsius. These where graphed and compared to the known resistance vs temperature curve of the Delphi sensor. Attached is an Excel spreadsheet and also the supplied data sheet for the Delphi sensor.

The majority of what is listed in this spreadsheet is self-explanatory, but the key part to pay attention to is the fair right hand column Temp Error, which shows the resulting error in the temperature measurement. The outlined box above, which currently is set to 14.2, represents the resistance in to be added in parallel. This 14.2 value can be changed and the effect shown numerically in the Temp Error column and visually on the graphed curve shown in purple.

The value of 14.2k Ohms is the one that I used and it worked great for me. You can see from 5 to 60 degrees the error is less than 1, up to 80 degrees it is out less than 5. After that the error starts to run away a fair bit, but personally I haven’t measured intake temperatures of over 60 degrees C.

It’s also important to move the sensor as to not be heat soaked by the plenum. I welded a mount into the steel piping, just after the intercooler.

I know back when I was first trying to fix this problem I searched long and hard but didn’t come up with any answers. It annoyed the crap out of me while I was attempting to get a stable, consistent tune that performed well in both hot and cold conditions. I’m sure there are many other methods of addressing this issue, but this how I approached it and it worked just fine for what I required of it. Hopefully this info helps some people out.

Cheers,

Dave.

post-42333-0-09878500-1351055450_thumb.gif

GM Air Temp Sensor Calibration.pdf

Standard RB26 vs Delphi Sensor.xlsx

  • Like 2

good work

cant download the 2nd file as it doesn't show a link, so how much degree's C is the sensor out from the rb26 sensor?

also can the sensor above be used to display onto a gauge as i'm currently using a ecu coolant sensor to display to a gauge?

Thanks guys, no problem. SAU helped me out so many times it's good to be able to contribute.

black bnr 32:

Yeah, sure I’ve done some tuning with it. Set it up about a year back and it made a world of difference to my tuning accuracy. Best part was the ability to pull out timing in the hotter weather (although sometimes really cold weather can’t take as much timing as you may expect). To confirm the sensor was reading correctly I inserted a thermocouple into the intake pipe and compared the 2 measurement in a series of different operating conditions, at steady state they were within a degree over the range I checked (although the sensor doesn’t respond quite as fast as the thermocouple ofcourse). Recently I’ve changed to a vipec/link and still use the exact same sensor, just with the parallel resister removed, but still quite impressed with how well the power fc (mine was djetro) works and how easy it is to tune (with datalogit ofcourse, handcontroller’s a joke).

.:::JAP TAXI:::. :

I checked the excel file and it downloaded fine for me, possibly try a different browser. Between 5 – 60 degrees Celsius it was out from the RB26 Sensor by under 1 degree. I’m sure the repeatable accuracy of the factory sensor is over +/- 1 degree anyhow, so we might as well consider it spot on. Sure it can be used to display on a gauge, but for you to get the correct reading the resistance vs temperature curve must match.

thanks for the reply. I'm using a d jetro and datalogit as well, and i think I'll give this a try.

I mean, IAT is theoretically a critical part of calculating air mass with a speed density system. The slow response and heat soak of the stock part CANT be ideal.

  • 5 months later...

figure i'll post in here as there's not much of this going on.

i've bought a gauge that comes with a temp probe, so i've removed probe and connected the gauge wires up to a sensor ( 2 pin ecu coolant type).

now said gauge over reads by about 100 deg c, therefor i've added a resistor/s in series on the senor wire to bring the gauge readings down with what it should be.

my problem is that the temps will get stuck and not go lower once the temps change from said sensor

any help, electronics ain't my strong point :glare:

Edited by Dan_J
  • 2 months later...

just wanted to bump this thread for some results. With the stock sensor, I see about 17*C of heat soak. The new sensor sees virtually none. So, my actual air temp is as much as 17*C different than what the stock sensor reads. I installed the new sensor in the plenum.

  • 7 months later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 10 months later...

Hi, sorry to message on such an old post but I have a couple of questions as I've just bought one of these sensors to do some DIY myself.

  1. If I were to place this just after the intercooler, which is pretty cold, but the plenum still gets hot, would the air not heat up by the time it reaches the cylinders and get worse as the plenum gets hotter?
  2. I have water injection on my car so if I were to put the temp sensor before this, I would be, as expected, getting readings that are higher than what goes to the cylinder however this value would be constant when at WoT, thus tuneable for those cells; is my logic correct there?

Many thanks!

  • 4 weeks later...

Such a legend this guy.

I have found the same sensor characteristics as the delphi but in a smaller frame sensor....

https://www.efihardware.com/products/1623/air-temperature-sensor-motorsport-series-18-bsp

buy some Nissan connectors, crimp in same resistor as said legend suggested, lathe an adaptor and voila - factory fit!!!

9_zpsae4d5f3c.jpg

Edited by LWO

From what I undrestood the air temp sensor is used by the ecuto back out timing when the intake temp is excessive

They use it to back out timing and not to add timing so heat soak on the sensor isn't a massive issue

It's a safety feature to protect against excessive intake temp / damaged intercooler / unlimited boost scramble

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
    • Ask me a bit later this week before payday
    • I agree that delayed payment probably isn't the most suitable solution. It seems a solid complete transaction would be best. As I wouldn't be using this sale as a line of credit that would typically earn interest, we can probably arrange a much cleaner single transaction deal. I can do $92.52 today. Would you prefer EFT, or Cash on Pickup?  😛
×
×
  • Create New...