Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

i am selling my 1996 r33 sII GTST as I need to make room in my garage as I dont drive it enough, i can make it cheaper by removing some of my aftermarket parts but i will list what it has now,

1996 sII White in great condition with m spec kit and lip spoiler on front,

77000kms with japanese as well as aussie service history

17" works wheels with good tyres

lowered tanabe street suspension

tanabe jasma approved 3 1/2" exhaust from cat back

hks evc II boost contoller

hks turbo timer

ms intakes pod filter

blitz front mount intercooler

blitz b.o.v

ngk plugs and mobil 1 oil with nulon additives

GDZOOK number plates (son of godzilla)

Premier metal window tint

autometer boost and air fuel gauge mounted on auto meter pod,

auto italia steering wheel with proper airbag boss kit (spare airbag wheel)

Alpine cdr 7873

focal polyflex splits in front

apline r type splits in rear

kicker 12" sub in box

clarion 400w 4 channel amp mounted

response 450w rms amp for sub mounted.

Narva ultra white head light globes

it has a alarm with window closers and turbo timer control as well as separate 4 point immobiliser.

pics for stereo can be found here http://forums.skylinesdownunder.co....&threadid=11625

i am looking for $25500 as is or can be cheaper without stereo gear and gauges and hks stuff. also see attached pic can email more if anyone is interested.

Scott

0405-428-646

I will take $24500 this is a really good price for the car...the market must be bad atm cause ive had it at a car yard on consignment in the trading post for 6 weeks and only about 6 ppl have seen it...any hints from anyone...i had one good offer from here for 24k but i didnt take it but in hindsight i shouldve cause now ive spent more money on it...any hints are appreciated

Scott

gdzook,

lovely car... don't drop the price anymore unless your desperate, it should sell soon hopefully... for a series II and all those extras that is a very good price, good luck with the sale.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...