Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys another one to avoid. While this car is not advertised on the dealer's website, I can assure you it is currently for sale at Elite Motorsports/ Sports auto group, being advertised with 38 xxxKM. It is a 2002 BNR34 M Spec Nur in pearl white.

What is most unusual about this car is that the seats have been retrimmed ( strange for a 30 xxx km car) in black without the GTR logo on the headrest .

A car that looks identical was sold by FC autosource, here is the link:

http://www.fcautosource.com/ListingDetail.aspx?fcauto_id=19560

Here is a screen shot:

post-133648-0-83082500-1404988271_thumb.png

Here is a pic of the seats

post-133648-0-83804100-1404986149_thumb.png

Here is the vin number taken from the car at the dealership in Sydney:

BNR34- 404019

I have aquired the Japanese registration certificate for the corresponding car in Japanese and English:

BNR34-404019 (2).pdf

Please note:

- The Name of owner is listed as FC autosource

-The last two records of registration are only 9 days and nearly 3000KM apart. Seems strange?

-These recordings were 1) 30 900KM and 2) 33 700KM.

Yet another example of a clocked GTR. It would be interesting to know just what % of R34 GTR's in Oz have genuine km's with solid supporting documentation. I suspect well under 25%. I'm currently advertising my Nur, with fully documented km's, japanese and Aussie service records etc etc, yet it gets compared with cars like the above with lower km's showing on the speedo and dodgy docs. Crazy. The people I feel most sorry for are the guys that don't do all the research and end up buying a 150,000km car without knowing. And Fair Trading NSW don't want to know. Great...

Here is the vin number taken from the car at the dealership in Sydney:

BNR34- 404019

I have aquired the Japanese registration certificate for the corresponding car in Japanese and English:

attachicon.gifBNR34-404019 (2).pdf

Please note:

- The Name of owner is listed as FC autosource

-The last two records of registration are only 9 days and nearly 3000KM apart. Seems strange?

-These recordings were 1) 30 900KM and 2) 33 700KM.

Nice work Steve - what you've stumbled on is an advanced technique called a "refresh".

The services of certain mileage verification services in getting hold of de-registration certificates have caused significant issues for import dealerships. The dealer you mentioned in particular has been using this technique to hide it's tracks. Unfortunately many consumers don't understand how a de-registration certificate is supposed to work, and therefore miss the point you've illustrated in regard to the 9-day gap between registrations. They look at the last mileage recorded and figure all must be hunky-dory.

Here is the auction sheet for the car:

nFeYY2q.jpg

X33Kk4Xs.jpg VPuc8XOs.jpg ZAlWjE8s.jpg

So the complete timeline looks like this:

1) [27/2/2014] Car sells at USS Tokyo - 173,414km

--- rewind occurs ---

2) [31/3/2014] Car is re-registered with 30,900km

3) [08/4/2014] Car is re-registered with 33,700km

Since the department of transport in Japan only record the previous two mileage readings, this scrubs the true mileage from the system. Inside Japan this would be a risky exercise as for a short window of time there is conclusive proof that an illegal odometer rewind occured. Unfortunately the car leaves the country a matter of days later, so it's unlikely anyone notices or that anything can be done.

Edited by dodgyimports

Nice work Steve - what you've stumbled on is an advanced technique called a "refresh".

The services of certain mileage verification services in getting hold of de-registration certificates have caused significant issues for import dealerships. The dealer you mentioned in particular has been using this technique to hide it's tracks. Unfortunately many consumers don't understand how a de-registration certificate is supposed to work, and therefore miss the point you've illustrated in regard to the 9-day gap between registrations. They look at the last mileage recorded and figure all must be hunky-dory.

Here is the auction sheet for the car:

nFeYY2q.jpg

X33Kk4Xs.jpg VPuc8XOs.jpg ZAlWjE8s.jpg

So the complete timeline looks like this:

1) [27/2/2014] Car sells at USS Tokyo - 173,414km

--- rewind occurs ---

2) [31/3/2014] Car is re-registered with 30,900km

3) [08/4/2014] Car is re-registered with 33,700km

Since the department of transport in Japan only record the previous two mileage readings, this scrubs the true mileage from the system. Inside Japan this would be a risky exercise as for a short window of time there is conclusive proof that an illegal odometer rewind occured. Unfortunately the car leaves the country a matter of days later, so it's unlikely anyone notices or that anything can be done.

^^^ this has been going on for a while in Japan by the dodgy people who operate there in the export industry.

^^^ this has been going on for a while in Japan by the dodgy people who operate there in the export industry.

Certainly, the local dealerships would like you to believe that it's the "dodgy exporters" when they point the finger of blame.

Look again at the above example, it wasn't the exporter who has advertised the car in question with super-low mileage.

Nevermind the fact that at the time the dealers get the cars complied, these examples are almost always inside the 3-month window whereby almost anyone can look up the auction records. As if the dealership, having operated in the industry for years wouldn't know where to look.

How likely is it as well for the dealer themselves to have facilitated the purchase at auction and then slipped their exporter some extra cash to make it happen?

If this was happening, they didn't know then were enlightened of the fact you'd think they would switch to a different exporter with a good reputation and it wouldn't happen anymore. Instead the same stuff has been going on for years and years with some of these mobs.

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...