Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

They do self learn fast, but that wouldn't help much with cold starts as the widebands aren't very accurate initially.

Holden were still using the Continental ethanol sensors until recently, when they ditched flex fuel. I am getting a free sensor from one of the Holden design techs as he has no use for it anymore.

When I was tuned on e70 a few years ago I used to fill at the Powerplus e85 pump and add 6L or so to the mix to keep the wideband happy. It just becomes a pain in the arse, better to tune on e85 and run a little rich on the e70 if you use it.

We don't have United E85 in Hobbitville yet but there are two Eflex outlets so that's what I run . For street only I think Eflex is a little more user friendly in some ways and still better turbo tucker than 98 PULP .

A while back a few here did tests to show the power difference between E70 and E85 but I can't remember if it was that much of a difference . Someone else said recently that the knock resistance with ethanol flattens out at about 40-50% so if that's true the benefit of more must be extra evaporative charge cooling .

That aside I didn't realise the General had given up on flex fuel and it would be interesting to know why .

A .

  • Like 1

Because it's shit fuel for a low compression NA V8, as long as they try to make the engine compatible with 91, it will never run well on ethanol imo, not without bumping the compression or charging. Economy was down 30% with no real power gains. The bogan crowd have always been against ethanol in their fuel so don't care if it's dropped, and with Caltex trying to get out of their contract, Holden would know flex fuel is dead in the water here. Only GM US were pushing them to use it, for the green aspect.

I have done power back to back tests between the brands, there was only 4kw in it. I will be filling on eflex in Canberra soon, apparently there is an airport run coming up and I want to see what the wagon can do when I stretch her legs. ;)

I agree , any engine built and tuned to run low octane fuel never gained anything out of better juice and went backwards on alcohol fuels consumption wise . The sad fact is that Joe Average buys the cheapest fuel he can get and the manufacturers are well aware of it .

It's beyond the scope of this thread but IMO the sooner we get a consistent lower blend like 25 to 40% the less the general public would fear ethanol . Most people I speak to , performance people aside , tell me how it burns out your seals and engine and are aghast when I tell them about using 70% for long enough to know better .

The problem is that people know that E10 is cheap and not very fuel efficient and assume if 10% is bad more must be worse . The other sad fact is that EPAs the world over wanted Ethanol (E10) for failed f**kwit green reasons and all it ever did was make in theory emissions content look a smidge cleaner .

I don't see too many manufacturers lining up to make E100 engines and as long as ULP engines are the norm you'll always get a consumption penalty burning high ethanol blend fuels . To get the best of both for volume sales setting the bar at the effective knock limit percentage means better consumption per litre and that's the thing people care most about .

With E85, the closest United to me that sells it is Dee Why. That's still about 20-25 minutes from my place. I'm wondering how long you can keep fuel sitting around in drums before it absorbs too much water? Or if you have it sealed is it pretty much a non-issue?

I also have a 200L drum under the house I could clean out and use with a hand pump but I'm not sure how well I could seal it.

Tuner mentioned that as more water enters the fuel, the octane number drops slightly potentially causing det for an entire drum of fuel. He also mentioned something about people having rusted injectors from it in cases where the car isn't driven more than once a fortnight etc. I'm not worried about that personally just curious if anyone has heard of anything. Thanks

Edited by Blackkers

If it's a daily it won't be an issue.

I used to use a 220L drum, I filled it with 20psi air pressure to pump the fuel out a servo style nozzle, it filled the car tank in no time. You are welcome to it if you are local, I now just use the low 20L red Bunnings drums as they are easier to transport.

It will keep fine if in a sealed container.

  • 2 weeks later...

Things are looking like changing in America with ethanol fuel blends and there is a push to introduce E15 for cars made from/after 2oo1 - or was it 2007 ? I think the corn growers want to expand ethanol production which means introducing blends greater than 10% .

Real world I think the problem is that E10 is made with ~ 90% piss grade ULP and all the 10% ethanol content does is make many engines run leaner . In other words there isn't enough ethanol in it to raise the octane rating to the point where knock sensors stay dormant and not cause the system to retard the ignition timing . More ethanol ie 15%+ can raise the octane rating of 91ULP but it seems you need a computer smart enough to compensate for the leaner AFR .

I did find a few reports OS showing how some blends in the E20-E30 range can match and sometimes very slightly better consumption compared to 91 ULP .

There was another interesting fact that the oil co's are blending the ethanol and then setting the price of blended fuels meaning they are controlling the consumer price of the ethanol content which is a rort . Ethanol is shit loads cheaper to produce than ULP but to look at the price of E70/85 on the pumps you wouldn't think so . It's a shame independents can't source bulk ethanol and buy/blend ULP at reasonable rates to reduce the end price for us . Obviously the oil co's see ethanol as a threat and given a choice there wouldn't be any in fuel at all .

I hope that E15-25 blends become available here and someone with enough of a public following can prove that there is no disadvantage in using it in cars made in the last 7-10 years . Joe average still thinks ethanol burns out the seals in his engine killing it but who's ever seen that happen ?

I think we are going to have to stand up for ethanol blends of which E10 is a waste of time . The main stream is clearly not interested in E70-85 because the cost of motoring is their main concern and at those levels there's nothing in it for them with engines optimised for 91-95 ULP . Main stream sales ultimately make or break any products success and ethanols survival will depend on govt legislation , read green slime garbage , and possibly low to mid percentage blends if they are cost effective for Joe average .

Quick question regarding "e85". Is it always going to be the same amount of ethanol? I've read that you can get varying degrees of ethanol content from the same supplier. I know Shell sells E70 and United sells E85 I'm talking variance within the brand. Also if I ask the guy at the counter is there any chance he would know the exact content?

I'd only really want to know when tuning initially so that I don't tune on E70 thinking its E85 then one day run E90. I know an ethanol tune isn't particularly sensitive and I've got a wideband for security but I'd still rather know than find out later.

Also if I tune on E85 then fill up with shell E70, yes rich is safe but won't I potentially lose some knock protection? or does the tuner account for this and bring timing back from the edge slightly?

Quick question regarding "e85". Is it always going to be the same amount of ethanol? I've read that you can get varying degrees of ethanol content from the same supplier. I know Shell sells E70 and United sells E85 I'm talking variance within the brand. Also if I ask the guy at the counter is there any chance he would know the exact content?

I'd only really want to know when tuning initially so that I don't tune on E70 thinking its E85 then one day run E90. I know an ethanol tune isn't particularly sensitive and I've got a wideband for security but I'd still rather know than find out later.

Also if I tune on E85 then fill up with shell E70, yes rich is safe but won't I potentially lose some knock protection? or does the tuner account for this and bring timing back from the edge slightly?

Shell sells e85 now?

Get a tune on United, then run whatever you like. Safe as houses.

Am I thinking caltex or shell? Who other than united sells a high ethanol content fuel in Sydney? and is it essentially the same as united e85?

I can't wait to tune for e85 just have to sort out a solid intake, bigger injectors, fuel pump then i'll be knocking the tuners door down

Edited by Blackkers

United have brought out and app that lets uses your location to tell you the closest service stations and the cost for the day, and of course which fuels they have on site...

I searched "united" in the app store..

Happy Days :yes:

So my understanding of this thread is that this fuel isn't recommended for non daily driven cars?

My cars lucky to be driven once a month sometimes, would this cause the fuel to go off?

So my understanding of this thread is that this fuel isn't recommended for non daily driven cars?

My cars lucky to be driven once a month sometimes, would this cause the fuel to go off?

huh? Heaps of track and drift cars run it.

Edited by superben

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...